Rotors

Locked
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Rotors

Post by illusionist »

The spinny things that turn.
thedoctor
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: May 14th, 2011, 4:10 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rotors

Post by thedoctor »

Anyone think they'll be trying designs using more than 2 blades per rotor?
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rotors

Post by illusionist »

I've tried 4 blades, construction was a little difficult (balancing all 8 blades). Also, it adds a lot of weight, which may not be the possible benefit of using so many blades. 3 blades might be better, but construcitng them will be difficult
thedoctor
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: May 14th, 2011, 4:10 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rotors

Post by thedoctor »

Yeah, I thought so when I was brainstorming ideas for this season. But assuming you could keep weight down and such, do you think more blades is better? I'm inclined to think so though I have no real scientific basis for why.
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rotors

Post by illusionist »

Same, I'm not sure of the reasoning behind which one works best. However, I may try to rebuild a 4-bladed design this year since my building skills have significantly improved.
thedoctor
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: May 14th, 2011, 4:10 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rotors

Post by thedoctor »

I think the reason I think more blades would be beneficial is because real helicopters have a lot of blades (although they aren't the best model of efficiency). Is anyone making Larrabee props for their rotors?
thedoctor
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: May 14th, 2011, 4:10 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rotors

Post by thedoctor »

Oh does anyone have any thoughts on rotors with large surface area vs rotors with lower surface areas (other than the fact that low surface area = lower weight)?
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rotors

Post by illusionist »

Oh yes I do. If you have a large surface are, you will need to use a very low pitch. If you have a smaller surface area, then of course you will need to use a higher pitch. I don't know how accurate the following statement is, but I would use the lower surface area with thinner rubberbands.
thedoctor
Member
Member
Posts: 44
Joined: May 14th, 2011, 4:10 pm
Division: C
State: NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Rotors

Post by thedoctor »

Thinner?

Doesn't the increased pitch require more torque?
chalker7
Member
Member
Posts: 612
Joined: September 27th, 2010, 5:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: HI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rotors

Post by chalker7 »

thedoctor wrote:Thinner?

Doesn't the increased pitch require more torque?
Thinner rotor blades don't necessarily have higher pitches than fat rotors.

Just to throw a wrinkle into the conversation, if I were building a helicopter for competition I would build very wide, elliptical blades with relatively low pitch (they would look like short, fat F1D propellers). However, that would be far more difficult to construct than the traditional cross-style rotors that everyone has used for the past couple of years.
National event supervisor - Wright Stuff, Helicopters
Hawaii State Director
Locked

Return to “Helicopters C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests