Efficiencies

jander14indoor
Member
Member
Posts: 1653
Joined: April 30th, 2007, 7:54 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: Efficiencies

Post by jander14indoor »

Div B high scores broke 50
Div C high scores were in the mid-40s

Jeff Anderson
Livonia, MI
User avatar
lllazar
Member
Member
Posts: 839
Joined: November 19th, 2009, 7:20 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by lllazar »

Very nice, what was top 10 breakdown? Did low 30s break top 10?
2011 Season Events~

Fossils (Regionals ~1st) (State ~6th)
Towers (Regionals ~1st) (State ~3rd)
Helicopter (Regionals -3rd gahhh) (State ~5th)
Wind Power (Regionals ~1st) (State ~3rd TIERED!)

Hooray for getting everything i wanted?
User avatar
hpfananu
Member
Member
Posts: 142
Joined: July 11th, 2010, 5:22 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by hpfananu »

We got...35 around and 6th in Div. B.
Materials Science|Water Quality|Disease Detectives
Sleep is for the Weak: SLHS SO 2012-2013
TAMS 2013-2014
User avatar
lucwilder42
Member
Member
Posts: 114
Joined: March 30th, 2010, 10:01 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by lucwilder42 »

I got second with 45.271, anybody know troys score?
I'm just here to build bridges
nejanimb
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 343
Joined: November 14th, 2008, 5:17 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by nejanimb »

Slightly over 48, I believe.
Harriton '10, UVA '14
Event Supervisor in MA (prev. VA and NorCal)
User avatar
tornado guy
Member
Member
Posts: 449
Joined: April 17th, 2011, 7:23 pm
Division: C
State: WA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by tornado guy »

We were really disappointed, my team mates tower got a 42-43 efficiency at our Region and State. For Nationals we did the exact same design except a tad bit lighter and it ended up breaking at 14 for efficiency. We really have no clue on what happened. :?
Proud ExCEL Homeschooler for five awesome years!
Nationals 2012: Meteorology 5th, R&M 19th, WQ 21st, DP 30th. Team 11th

Regionals 2013 C division: DP 3rd, WQ 5th.
User avatar
tornado guy
Member
Member
Posts: 449
Joined: April 17th, 2011, 7:23 pm
Division: C
State: WA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by tornado guy »

We were really disappointed, my team mates tower got a 42-43 efficiency at our Region and State. For Nationals we did the exact same design except a tad bit lighter and it ended up breaking at 14 for efficiency. We really have no clue on what happened. :?
Proud ExCEL Homeschooler for five awesome years!
Nationals 2012: Meteorology 5th, R&M 19th, WQ 21st, DP 30th. Team 11th

Regionals 2013 C division: DP 3rd, WQ 5th.
dragonfly
Member
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: May 3rd, 2009, 6:18 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by dragonfly »

nejanimb wrote:Slightly over 48, I believe.
Actually it was almost a 54 if I'm not mistaken. Congratulations Troy on a fantastic job!

I was fairly disappointed in the other tower efficiencies...I'd expected there would be a greater amount with higher scores in the top 10....either way congratulations to everyone else as well!
``````( ) ( ) /
------------
``````( ) ( ) \

PA 2009, 1st Bridges : 2010, 1st Bridges, 1st WM : 2011, 1st ED, 3rd Towers, 4th Heli
Nats Augusta 2009, 4th Bridges : Illinois 2010, 3rd Bridges, 9th ED : Wisconsin 2011, 3rd Heli, 5th Towers : Orlando 2012, 2nd ED, 5th Towers
Event Supervisor Balsa, ED
User avatar
googlyfrog
Member
Member
Posts: 161
Joined: August 13th, 2009, 8:55 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by googlyfrog »

Our tower gained almost 2 grams on the way, and it used to give us an efficiency around 30. Something happened, and it broke and gave us an efficiency of 9, so we got 48th place. They didn't slow-mo our tower break, so I'm still confused as to how it broke. The chimney basically just collapsed I guess, but I don't know why. I know this is a pretty vague description of what happened, but does anyone have any possible theories about why it happened?
User avatar
lucwilder42
Member
Member
Posts: 114
Joined: March 30th, 2010, 10:01 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Efficiencies

Post by lucwilder42 »

dragonfly wrote:
nejanimb wrote:Slightly over 48, I believe.
Actually it was almost a 54 if I'm not mistaken. Congratulations Troy on a fantastic job!

I was fairly disappointed in the other tower efficiencies...I'd expected there would be a greater amount with higher scores in the top 10....either way congratulations to everyone else as well!
54 is ridonkulous, i want a picture
I'm just here to build bridges
Locked

Return to “Towers B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests