Search found 5 matches

by bwilby
May 20th, 2013, 11:31 am
Forum: 2013 Study Events
Topic: Remote Sensing C
Replies: 60
Views: 28883

Re: Remote Sensing C

Exactly. I feel as though this should be brought up to someone...idk who though...what do you all think? Honestly it wouldn't do anything. It's just a dam shame that we all studied for an entire year for a test we never got to take. That's how I felt about Food Science at States when I was in 11th ...
by bwilby
May 20th, 2013, 7:44 am
Forum: 2013 Study Events
Topic: Remote Sensing C
Replies: 60
Views: 28883

Re: Remote Sensing C

reesabp wrote:Exactly. I feel as though this should be brought up to someone...idk who though...what do you all think?
Honestly it wouldn't do anything. It's just a dam shame that we all studied for an entire year for a test we never got to take.
by bwilby
May 20th, 2013, 6:53 am
Forum: 2013 Study Events
Topic: Remote Sensing C
Replies: 60
Views: 28883

Re: Remote Sensing C

If you prepared for a RS test like everyone in the past, that test was sooooo off-base. It did not accurately reflect the rules. Fozendog and I were talking about how it was basically a Dynamic Planet Test + Water Quality + a hint of Satellites (the GRACE questions). That's exactly what it was like...
by bwilby
May 20th, 2013, 6:50 am
Forum: 2013 Study Events
Topic: Remote Sensing C
Replies: 60
Views: 28883

Re: Remote Sensing C

Yeah, I definitely wanna hear about the test. I know the kids at Ward Melville who did it are very good at it (1st at States), but they ended up with 50th. I'm sure there's a hilarious story behind that, but I haven't heard it yet. Well, I'm not sure what you've heard, but there were six stations, ...
by bwilby
May 20th, 2013, 6:45 am
Forum: 2013 Study Events
Topic: Remote Sensing C
Replies: 60
Views: 28883

Re: Remote Sensing C

I agree with everything that has been said. It was a different supervisor than usual, and quite a disappointing test.

Go to advanced search