Really? Bad Graduation Year I Guesspjgscioisamazing wrote:The thing is, Brother Fox Latin School didn't even make states this year.
Search found 2904 matches
- March 27th, 2009, 10:27 am
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
- March 27th, 2009, 7:56 am
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
Yeah, WM had a few bombs (mostly tech, and, um...env chem *cough*), but we did well enough in the other events to make up for it. Last year, it seemed like competition for the top 3 or 4 was fiercer than this year, but the top 10 were spread out more. Just the top three. As I said, you guys beat th...
- March 27th, 2009, 7:51 am
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
The question for us is, do the results from C have any bearing on the B competition? Are trends there likely to show up in ours as well? I don't know but, the thing aqbout the competion for the second state slot being weaker-happend at our regional for the second of four states slots -last year we(...
- March 27th, 2009, 5:45 am
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
The question for us is, do the results from C have any bearing on the B competition? Are trends there likely to show up in ours as well? I don't know but, the thing aqbout the competion for the second state slot being weaker-happend at our regional for the second of four states slots -last year we(...
- March 24th, 2009, 5:25 pm
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
Congradulations to everyone in C division, anyway for B division now, Who's going to be there, I will for sure, even though I won't be on a team (My team made it but due to the fact that I'm on the team 2 I didn't). Any predictions? your coming?! great! i can tell you the exact things after the com...
- March 24th, 2009, 4:23 pm
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
there were a lot of upsets it seemed like this year...the huge one i can think of was spakenkill going down all the way to 15th!!! they were behind us and somebody heard them say they thought they were gonna be in the top 5...wow. also j-d didn't do as well as expected, especially after doing aweso...
- March 16th, 2009, 6:22 am
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
I don't knowJocool wrote:why do you drop events
- March 16th, 2009, 6:22 am
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
My predictions:
1:Wellwood
2:Eagle Hill
3:Gelianas
4:Murphy
lol I don't think we'll win, but our team is pessimistic so OPTIMISIM TIME
1:Wellwood
2:Eagle Hill
3:Gelianas
4:Murphy
lol I don't think we'll win, but our team is pessimistic so OPTIMISIM TIME
- March 9th, 2009, 5:05 pm
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
yes it is correctFlavorflav wrote:I think the point is that we don't know how many events are run in your region. Also, it sounds like in your region you drop your two lowest event scores. Is that correct?
- March 9th, 2009, 4:05 pm
- Forum: 2009 Invitationals, Regionals, and States
- Topic: New York 2009
- Replies: 681
- Views: 142765
Re: New York 2009
i havn't really done the math, is it 18 events total? but are you factoring in the drop--Eagle Hill's drop was 13pts the non-adjusted score was 49 but the standings are by the adjusted score which was 36pts