Scioly.org

Oh, look at this. The thread has returned, I should check this site more often.

1. Daniel Wright
2. Solon
3. Winston Churchill
4. Science and Arts
5. Mentor Memorial
6. Meads Mill
7. Beckondorff
8. Paul J. Gelinas
9. Shady Side
10. Booth

This is the correct answer

In the rubric, it states you must elaborate on different ways to interpret the hypothesis. I don't have a good understanding of this. Can anyone explain in-depth what this states, and maybe give an example? Thanks for any help.

I'm looking for specific and reliable links for information on missions. I would like to know more about missions that involve the moons specifically indicated in the rules. This has been my weakest area in this event so far, and I would really like to improve my knowledge on it. Thanks in advance.

....

Oh, I'm sorry. I was trying to be like you today!

I think my team can make it to nationals. We are better than we were last year, and we made it last year. Not going to put a guarantee on anything though.

Just got back from a five hour car(not bus) ride. The tournament was really fun and well run. Thanks to all the people that made this happen, and congratulations to all the teams that came.

Oh boy, arsonist discussion!

awesome90220 wrote:

caseyotis wrote:#don'twatchTV
#stilllivin'
#don'tjudgebrah

#hashtag
#hashtagsarejustnumbersigns
#toomanyhashtags

#notenoughhashtagsbecausetheyaresohashtaggingawesome

Crazy Puny Man wrote:

silverheart7 wrote:I have a Meteorology Today textbook, 2004 edition. But does anyone have recommendations for studying for this year?

My teammate said that thing's like the Meteo Bible...back when we were in middle school, that is

OMG That's what my old coach called it!