Search found 5765 matches

by Unome
February 3rd, 2020, 1:22 pm
Forum: Gravity Vehicle C
Topic: Scores
Replies: 65
Views: 4137

Re: Scores

lavarball wrote:
February 3rd, 2020, 4:25 am
Top 7 scores at solon were 10 and under...
Yeah, I was wondering. Those scores seemed quite a bit better than I was expecting. Does anyone know what the distance was?
by Unome
February 3rd, 2020, 1:20 pm
Forum: Machines B/C
Topic: Machines B/C
Replies: 142
Views: 12763

Re: Machines B/C

I'm curious how device scores are looking, especially at the upper end. I'd expect around 38-42 out of 45 to be leading scores nationally. Getting 41+ in practice Last time machines was a nats event, top score was about 98.1, so I'd expect about 44 as the top device score The scoring formula weight...
by Unome
February 3rd, 2020, 1:14 pm
Forum: Regionals & States
Topic: New York 2020
Replies: 71
Views: 9513

Re: New York 2020

Perhaps you are thinking of scores from some time ago? We got 35 a couple years back, but while I've been in high school there's been a lot of Team A/Team B competition for top spots at regionals events and we were nowhere near that score. From my discussions with Team B people, often one or two qu...
by Unome
February 2nd, 2020, 8:24 pm
Forum: Machines B/C
Topic: Machines B/C
Replies: 142
Views: 12763

Re: Machines B/C

I'm curious how device scores are looking, especially at the upper end. I'd expect around 38-42 out of 45 to be leading scores nationally.
by Unome
February 2nd, 2020, 8:20 pm
Forum: Regionals & States
Topic: Ohio 2020
Replies: 48
Views: 6041

Re: Ohio 2020

Solon B 1. Churchill 82 2. Solon 123 3. Springhouse 180 4. Shady Side 205 5. Meads Mill 244 6. Churchill B 273 7. Solon B 315 8. Smith 317 9. Slauson 337 10. Slauson B 354 11. Chardon 359 12. Magsig 360 13. Mentor Memorial 366 14. Westlake 394 15. Boulan Park 423 That's very interesting, seeing as ...
by Unome
February 2nd, 2020, 1:07 pm
Forum: Detector Building C
Topic: Detector Building C
Replies: 177
Views: 14586

Re: Detector Building C

It sounds like it would be rather challenging to determine with certainty whether or not a team was knowingly using the SHH model. I could imagine a team independently coming up with it.
by Unome
February 2nd, 2020, 12:50 pm
Forum: Mission Possible B
Topic: Clarifying "Initiates the next action..."
Replies: 26
Views: 1865

Re: Clarifying "Initiates the next action..."

Well, the FAQ has been answered: 02/01/2020 IF THE GOLF BALL WHICH IS RAISED FOR ONE OF THE OTHER TASKS WERE TO FALL INTO A CUP TO BECOME A COUNTERWEIGHT FOR THE PULLEY TASK (3.C.VII), WOULD THAT BE CONSIDERED AS "BEING UTILIZED BY MORE THAN ONE ASSIGNED ACTION" UNDER 3.A.IV? Yes, it would be consi...
by Unome
February 2nd, 2020, 12:45 pm
Forum: Wright Stuff C
Topic: New Score Sheet
Replies: 9
Views: 1205

Re: New Score Sheet

Ah... I remember spending some time thinking through this problem last year, but the adding of flights would throw that for a loop. I'll have to take a look at the scoresheet and rules more closely when I get a chance.
by Unome
February 1st, 2020, 4:45 pm
Forum: Regionals & States
Topic: New York 2020
Replies: 71
Views: 9513

Re: New York 2020

nassau east 1. syosset (68) gets a states bid 2. hicksville (148) gets a states bid 3. division (158) gets a states bid 4. wantagh (183) gets a states bid 5. jericho (193) gets a states bid 6. syo b (218) 7. jfk (218) gets a states bid 8. syo c (273) 9. jericho b (286) 10. douglas macauthur (316) T...
by Unome
February 1st, 2020, 3:53 pm
Forum: Regionals & States
Topic: New York 2020
Replies: 71
Views: 9513

Re: New York 2020

nassau east 1. syosset (68) gets a states bid 2. hicksville (148) gets a states bid 3. division (158) gets a states bid 4. wantagh (183) gets a states bid 5. jericho (193) gets a states bid 6. syo b (218) 7. jfk (218) gets a states bid 8. syo c (273) 9. jericho b (286) 10. douglas macauthur (316) T...

Go to advanced search