Scioly.org

sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑

October 26th, 2020, 11:41 pm

imagine going 1/3/1/1/1/1/1/4 in fermi

imagine winning roller coaster at nats

sciolyperson1 wrote: ↑

October 26th, 2020, 11:39 pm

imagine winning astro and code at ut

imagine winning gravity at bear

yall seem very good

twoplustwoisten wrote: ↑

October 3rd, 2020, 11:44 am

Decrypt the following:
Cement does not possess any proper tactical strategy

semantics
Here's a short and easy aristocrat:
RUHCXI NZ CFH EXC UA BLNCNLW ROHEZBXH YNCF CXBCF

astronomybuff wrote: ↑

September 8th, 2020, 11:14 am

Wait, how would you answer those questions? I'm only familiar with the formula for the scharzschild radius.

a and b is just scharzschild a couple of times. this is useful for c. d is wiens law, and e I used the 2(Rs/R) formula given here but idk if that's right

Starting off from last marathon: A. What's the density of a schwarzschild black hole with a mass of 6.0E31 kg? (in kg/m^3) B. Would this black hole be more or less dense than a more massive one? C. What's the black hole's temperature D. What would the wavelength of the emitted blackbody radiation b...

The questions and key to the Fermi test can be found here. Feel free to DM me if you have any questions or concerns about the test.

Would a plagiarism checker be effective? I doubt most people would straight up copy paste answers in. It isn't that hard to rephrase an answer you found online anyways.

Once again correct me if I am wrong but M should be the mass of the body that the object is orbiting around, not the mass of the object that is orbiting. So in this problem, the mass is equal to M2 in both situations. From what I understand, the mass in KTL is the combined mass of the entire system...

Happy birthday giant and t2d!