Scioly.org

Div C (Ignoring Team B, assuming everyone stacks, which they probably won't) 1. Solon 2. WWPN 3. Northville 4. Columbia 5. Camas 6. FM 7. Clark 8. Ward 9. TJHSST 10. Fairfax 11. Syosset 12. Montgomery 13. Stuyvesant 14. SSA 15. idk Langley? I like these predictions. However TJ was perfectly unstack...

Overall, the DUSO put together a very good invitational! Alex, I think we shared a homeroom together as I was on the CHHS team. I wanted to ask how well your boomilever did because I think I saw you test it but never got the chance to ask. Ours weighed 8.64 g and held 7.122 kg. That was only 4th pl...

I hope everyone enjoyed Designer Genes today! Overall, scores were about what I expected. I'm not sure what I'm allowed to post online in terms of raw scores, but the highest teams were around 70%. I hope to publish the test and key online, but I need to check with DUSO first. If anyone has question...

Duke Invitational 2019
Results here
1. Enloe A (93)
2. NCSSM A (105)
3. Fairfax A (163)
4. TJHSST B (166)
5. TJHSST A (177)
6. TJHSST C (178)
7. NCSSM B (183)
8. Raleigh Charter (201)

Good luck to all teams competing tomorrow!

Unome wrote:

primitive_polonium wrote:IIRC the Designer Genes event supervisor will be the Nationals supervisor? (I think it's Designer Genes.)

Ah, I thought I recognized the name. That's pretty interesting news.

If this is public info, could someone tell me who this is?

MIT Invitational 2019 Result Links: Standard Scores (Avogadro) Manually Stacked Document (not mine) Standard Results|1. Acton Boxborough A (223) 2. Boca Raton A (241) 3. Acton Boxborough B (253) 4. Columbia (256) 5. William G. Enloe (270) 6. LASA (281) 7. Clements (302) 8. Ward Melville A (351) 9. ...

The purpose of this thread is to compile results from invitational tournaments taking place during the 2018-19 season. All posts on this thread must follow these rules, or else they will be removed: 1. They must consist SOLELY of invitational results. No discussion, no predictions, no questions. 2....

Test being too long This is a point that I have to respectfully take issue with. While this test was longer than last year's test (780 vs. 700 points), part of dealing with a test like this is being able to distinguish between what is important to the overall test and what isn't and how to optimize...

terence.tan wrote:does anyone know about the winning build scores?

Rough estimates for mission were posted here: viewtopic.php?f=291&p=373794#p373794