Not that there isn't room for improvement.JSGandora wrote:Is this a typo? Or am I just interpreting it wrong?chalker wrote:Not that there isn't room for improvement though.......we are always open to suggestions for rules changes for next year and actually will be starting the internal discussion process in the next month or so.
It's a double negative.
I can't speak for him, but I'm assuming he meant it to be interpreted as there is room for improvement.