Page 3 of 5

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 18th, 2013, 7:49 am
by Hosj
Pretty sure I am the only one from NB who uses this site :(

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 20th, 2013, 7:19 pm
by Slarik
Nice job North Bethesda!

Who won the HS division (I had to leave for a concert?)

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 20th, 2013, 7:25 pm
by Hosj
Good job everyone!!! And espicially pilgramage, i bet that was really close. urbana is getting good too... Sorta reminds me of pilgramge 2 years ago...

Centtenial won high school, but WJ was disqualified in two events for ridicoulous reasons. And, pilgramage people, were we really annoying at the end? Sorry about that.

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 20th, 2013, 8:41 pm
by Slarik
Hosj wrote:Good job everyone!!! And espicially pilgramage, i bet that was really close. urbana is getting good too... Sorta reminds me of pilgramge 2 years ago...

Centtenial won high school, but WJ was disqualified in two events for ridicoulous reasons. And, pilgramage people, were we really annoying at the end? Sorry about that.
I wasn't there, but if by "annoying" you mean showing enthusiasm and team spirit - that's not a bad thing! I hope you were "annoying"!

Nice job Centennial! Watch out next year in Division C when we have more people :)

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 20th, 2013, 9:19 pm
by MrX
Good job B division teams. Kudos to NB for making it to Nationals. I am not quite sure what happened in division C, but we will find out tomorrow I suppose. Scores have not been released.

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 21st, 2013, 6:00 am
by Hosj
I just thought that when pilgrimage was called for 2nd place, we erupted in cheer, when we really should have waited for us to be called.

And Mr.X, what I heard is that in experimental design, they brought a scoring rubric in that they didn't know they weren't allowed to have. ( they had used it many times before) and the event proctors Disqualified them. (No appeal was made by the coach of WJ) and in Boomilever something was too long, so they would get tier two'd, but the event proctor gave them more time, but the boomilever guy refused to compete with a flawed boomilever, so he finished too late and so boomilever was considered a no show. Thus having lost 2 events, WJ did not place.

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 21st, 2013, 6:20 am
by Slarik
Hosj wrote:I just thought that when pilgrimage was called for 2nd place, we erupted in cheer, when we really should have waited for us to be called.

And Mr.X, what I heard is that in experimental design, they brought a scoring rubric in that they didn't know they weren't allowed to have. ( they had used it many times before) and the event proctors Disqualified them. (No appeal was made by the coach of WJ) and in Boomilever something was too long, so they would get tier two'd, but the event proctor gave them more time, but the boomilever guy refused to compete with a flawed boomilever, so he finished too late and so boomilever was considered a no show. Thus having lost 2 events, WJ did not place.
I asked if we could use a rubric and was told no. When I later heard WJ might be disqualified, I was glad I asked!

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 21st, 2013, 6:44 am
by Hosj
WJ was first block. The only reason there was the announcement was because of what WJ did.

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 21st, 2013, 1:19 pm
by Slarik
Hosj wrote:WJ was first block. The only reason there was the announcement was because of what WJ did.
There wasn't an announcement. I asked when we entered the room. However, because we had been told we could use it at regionals, I almost didn't ask!

Re: Maryland 2013

Posted: April 21st, 2013, 3:06 pm
by kwan
Why are you guys all pilgrams?