Trajectory B/C

croman74 · Post by **croman74** » April 20th, 2009, 1:48 pm

Here are some of the scores from my regionals. This is Div. B: http://www.gvsu.edu/mso-r12/index.cfm?i ... 154DD65757
My partner and I go first.
Here's Div. C: http://www.gvsu.edu/mso-r12/index.cfm?i ... 774C0C4DF3

boomtech · Post by **boomtech** » April 21st, 2009, 9:02 am

Hmm... some of those scores are quite up there. Interesting.

scigeek95 · Post by **scigeek95** » April 26th, 2009, 6:17 pm

My dad coaches... I don't know what his team got scoring wise, but they won at state!

croman74 · Post by **croman74** » April 26th, 2009, 6:18 pm

boomtech wrote:Hmm... some of those scores are quite up there. Interesting.

It's a really competitive region. Hopefully at states we can place 1st again!

fmtiger124 · Post by **fmtiger124** » April 27th, 2009, 2:53 pm

The person who did trajectory for us always manages to just miss medals she got
2008 states 6th(1 out of a medal)
2009 regionals 6th(also 1 out of a medal)
2009 states i think it was 7th(also 1 out of a medal)
Also our trajectory machine is EPIC!!!
It looks kind of like a bazooka on a stand
unfortunetly I don't have any pics otherwise I would post them

Post by **starpug** » April 27th, 2009, 4:18 pm

fmtiger124 wrote:The person who did trajectory for us always manages to just miss medals she got
2008 states 6th(1 out of a medal)
2009 regionals 6th(also 1 out of a medal)
2009 states i think it was 7th(also 1 out of a medal)
Also our trajectory machine is EPIC!!!
It looks kind of like a bazooka on a stand
unfortunetly I don't have any pics otherwise I would post them

Let me guess you used PVC/ABS pipe?

croman74 · Post by **croman74** » April 27th, 2009, 5:03 pm

A lot of devices look like that. It's an effective design.

Post by **starpug** » April 27th, 2009, 5:19 pm

croman74 wrote:A lot of devices look like that. It's an effective design.

Yeah I don't think we need pictures we've all seen the design, but still go ahead and upload if you have pics.

fmtiger124 · Post by **fmtiger124** » April 27th, 2009, 5:35 pm

starpug wrote:
croman74 wrote:A lot of devices look like that. It's an effective design.
Yeah I don't think we need pictures we've all seen the design, but still go ahead and upload if you have pics.

really? the people at NY states had never seen anything like it including all of the judges and all of the ones I saw were the classic lacrosse stick/some sort of holder thing launcher
yes it was PVC with bungee cords and a metal thing that pulled back which was clamped to be in launch position
Though I still think that it was different from the disign ur talking about It was more complex I believe but for all I know they are the same

Post by **starpug** » April 27th, 2009, 5:51 pm

fmtiger124 wrote:
starpug wrote:
croman74 wrote:A lot of devices look like that. It's an effective design.
Yeah I don't think we need pictures we've all seen the design, but still go ahead and upload if you have pics.
really? the people at NY states had never seen anything like it including all of the judges and all of the ones I saw were the classic lacrosse stick/some sort of holder thing launcher
yes it was PVC with bungee cords and a metal thing that pulled back which was clamped to be in launch position
Though I still think that it was different from the disign ur talking about It was more complex I believe but for all I know they are the same

Yep that's the same principle as our design. I posted pics of my device from 2 years ago here: 164|2/a2j_IMG_0021.jpg <--- That your general design?

Scioly.org

Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Re: Trajectory B/C

Who is online

Connect

Learn

Get Involved

About

Disclaimer