Metric Mastery B

User avatar
Bazinga+
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 383
Joined: March 8th, 2014, 7:10 am
Division: C
State: NY
Location: Ward Melville HD

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by Bazinga+ » May 20th, 2014, 6:25 pm

awesome90220 wrote:
Voltage wrote:
Bazinga+ wrote:did anyone else find the nationals metric event ridiculous? i mean they made you estimate the temperature of water TWICE and the results were DIFFERENT! Like thats ridiculous cuz the temp changes... and there were some other really dumb stations. Also the lego thing with '20' on it had more blocks on it for the measurement portion than on the estimation part.
I didn't find the event extremely ridiculous. It wasn't as hard as expected (the previous Metric Mastery person said something about way too many estimations per station and everyone bombing the event last year). I didn't notice that one lego block had more legos than the other, though it is plausible that such a mistake occurred. I do find the thing about the water slightly over the top. (How do they get the water in the estimation and measurement room to be the same? Doesn't the temperature of the water change over the course of the day?).
I don't know if this clashes with some of the rules, but can't there just be different precise answers for both measurement and estimation?
i dont believe so.... but my point waas the metric event wasnt what anyone expected, and it wsnt exactly the best event in the world. But i must admit it was well organized (with them taking you to different rooms and not letting you start estimating and measuring until they say go)
Innovation =/= success

User avatar
John Richardsim
Wiki Moderator
Wiki Moderator
Posts: 731
Joined: February 26th, 2014, 10:54 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Location: Robinson Twp.

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by John Richardsim » May 20th, 2014, 8:05 pm

Bazinga+ wrote:did anyone else find the nationals metric event ridiculous? i mean they made you estimate the temperature of water TWICE and the results were DIFFERENT! Like thats ridiculous cuz the temp changes... and there were some other really dumb stations. Also the lego thing with '20' on it had more blocks on it for the measurement portion than on the estimation part.
No, as a matter of fact, I found the test to be quite fair. My state director for metrics made us stand in the room and estimate the length of a dumpster outside by looking through a window. Seems fair, right? WRONG! Because for the measurement portion we were just given the information that a piece of tape on the dumpster was 50 centimeters long and from there we had to look out the window and "measure" the length of it. also, we were given a piece of frayed yarn (and a ruler) to measure the circumference of a metal rod that was so skinny that I had to have my partner measure it because my hands were way too big. And yes, he did have a temperature thrown in there. Also, with the measurement part for nationals, we only had to measure one thing for densities and the other measurement was given to us.
Si Quaeris Peninsulam Amoenam Circumspice

GoofyFoofer
Member
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: February 27th, 2014, 4:15 pm
State: OH
Location: Dayton, Ohio

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by GoofyFoofer » May 20th, 2014, 9:41 pm

In the SoCal state competition, the tester people messed up the test, so they didn't count that event in the awards. I was gonna win, too! :(
Smith Middle School
Dayton, OH

User avatar
John Richardsim
Wiki Moderator
Wiki Moderator
Posts: 731
Joined: February 26th, 2014, 10:54 am
Division: Grad
State: MI
Location: Robinson Twp.

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by John Richardsim » May 20th, 2014, 9:55 pm

GoofyFoofer wrote:In the SoCal state competition, the tester people messed up the test, so they didn't count that event in the awards. I was gonna win, too! :(
Don't worry, you'll always be a winner in my book. How did they mess up the test?
Si Quaeris Peninsulam Amoenam Circumspice

awesome90220
Member
Member
Posts: 158
Joined: March 10th, 2012, 5:19 pm
Division: B
State: AL
Location: somewhere on this cruel, harsh planet

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by awesome90220 » May 21st, 2014, 6:46 pm

Honestly, I'm just ready for Picture This :D
2016 Season: BISOT/Reg/State/Nats
Wind Power:9/1/1/11
Experimental Design:5/1/1/16
It's About Time:-/1/1/20

User avatar
knittingfrenzy18
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 142
Joined: April 3rd, 2012, 11:25 am
Division: B
State: MD
Location: Somewhere in the world.
Contact:

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by knittingfrenzy18 » May 23rd, 2014, 12:04 pm

The National event wasn't ridiculous, but I do hope they were being nice and consistent with the water too, making sure that it was re-calibrated/re-measured each period, and since they didn't have us go over the same objects (though identical, they weren't exactly the same), I hope they judged each of part 1 and part 2 by the objects in the respective rooms.

But yeah, it was pretty organized. It was sort of like that at States, and I'm pretty sure it couldn't get much better.

Was it just me, or part 2 and 3 of Metric Mastery in general are pretty hard to screw up? Anyone who spends 2 hours on MM can probably get an A or A+ on any part 2 and 3.

Anyways, I'm glad I got to know a very important part of standard science these days, and I'm so pumped for Picture This next year. My sister and I are psychic. :D
Pilgrimage Homeschool Division B, Maryland
Visited 2012 and 2014 National Tournaments, 5th place Sounds of Music 2014
http://knittingfrenzy18.wordpress.com

awesome90220
Member
Member
Posts: 158
Joined: March 10th, 2012, 5:19 pm
Division: B
State: AL
Location: somewhere on this cruel, harsh planet

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by awesome90220 » May 25th, 2014, 7:36 pm

knittingfrenzy18 wrote:The National event wasn't ridiculous, but I do hope they were being nice and consistent with the water too, making sure that it was re-calibrated/re-measured each period, and since they didn't have us go over the same objects (though identical, they weren't exactly the same), I hope they judged each of part 1 and part 2 by the objects in the respective rooms.

But yeah, it was pretty organized. It was sort of like that at States, and I'm pretty sure it couldn't get much better.

Was it just me, or part 2 and 3 of Metric Mastery in general are pretty hard to screw up? Anyone who spends 2 hours on MM can probably get an A or A+ on any part 2 and 3.

Anyways, I'm glad I got to know a very important part of standard science these days, and I'm so pumped for Picture This next year. My sister and I are psychic. :D
Well, part 2 is pretty risky, since lets say you get 7.4, and estimate to 7.39, but it was actually 7.43, and you get absolute blank on ur points
2016 Season: BISOT/Reg/State/Nats
Wind Power:9/1/1/11
Experimental Design:5/1/1/16
It's About Time:-/1/1/20

ckssv07
Member
Member
Posts: 186
Joined: March 22nd, 2011, 7:33 am
Division: C
State: PA

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by ckssv07 » May 26th, 2014, 9:10 am

awesome90220 wrote:
knittingfrenzy18 wrote:The National event wasn't ridiculous, but I do hope they were being nice and consistent with the water too, making sure that it was re-calibrated/re-measured each period, and since they didn't have us go over the same objects (though identical, they weren't exactly the same), I hope they judged each of part 1 and part 2 by the objects in the respective rooms.

But yeah, it was pretty organized. It was sort of like that at States, and I'm pretty sure it couldn't get much better.

Was it just me, or part 2 and 3 of Metric Mastery in general are pretty hard to screw up? Anyone who spends 2 hours on MM can probably get an A or A+ on any part 2 and 3.

Anyways, I'm glad I got to know a very important part of standard science these days, and I'm so pumped for Picture This next year. My sister and I are psychic. :D
Well, part 2 is pretty risky, since lets say you get 7.4, and estimate to 7.39, but it was actually 7.43, and you get absolute blank on ur points
The bulk of a teams score I feel usually comes from the estimating since you have to be extremely precise and accurate for measuring, and even if you are a fifth of a millimeter off, you get no points.

Sciolapedia
Member
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: March 26th, 2013, 4:58 pm
Division: C
State: PA

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by Sciolapedia » May 26th, 2014, 1:53 pm

Also, I doubt that most of the teams remembered to use significant figures on part 2 when they were multiplying and dividing numbers. ;)

awesome90220
Member
Member
Posts: 158
Joined: March 10th, 2012, 5:19 pm
Division: B
State: AL
Location: somewhere on this cruel, harsh planet

Re: Metric Mastery B

Post by awesome90220 » May 27th, 2014, 11:45 am

Sciolapedia wrote:Also, I doubt that most of the teams remembered to use significant figures on part 2 when they were multiplying and dividing numbers. ;)
Well, I'm pretty sure many of the teams that make it to Nats know about the sig figs they need by now ;)
2016 Season: BISOT/Reg/State/Nats
Wind Power:9/1/1/11
Experimental Design:5/1/1/16
It's About Time:-/1/1/20

Locked

Return to “2014 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest