Grasslands and Taiga.trajectoryroxs wrote:I have not heard that before but I hope to when Ecology advances and so does my smarticles..
By the way does anyone know what Ecology is morphing into?
Possibly two of the most boring biomes.
Grasslands and Taiga.trajectoryroxs wrote:I have not heard that before but I hope to when Ecology advances and so does my smarticles..
By the way does anyone know what Ecology is morphing into?
Very strange. I thought it would be Tundra or something, maybe. I don't really like grasslands, but deserts were very cool. So many adaptations!gneissisnice wrote:Grasslands and Taiga.trajectoryroxs wrote:I have not heard that before but I hope to when Ecology advances and so does my smarticles..
By the way does anyone know what Ecology is morphing into?
Possibly two of the most boring biomes.
Presumably because it's usually taught as one of the "list of biomes", and they're not really thinking, they're just taking from the "list".dickyjones wrote:Taiga still doesn't make sense to me. Two years ago the rule clarification for ecology stated the boreal forests would be included as a subtopic of forests. So why is it getting its own topic now?
so. true... grasslands... really boring.L42 wrote:Very strange. I thought it would be Tundra or something, maybe. I don't really like grasslands, but deserts were very cool. So many adaptations!gneissisnice wrote:Grasslands and Taiga.trajectoryroxs wrote:I have not heard that before but I hope to when Ecology advances and so does my smarticles..
By the way does anyone know what Ecology is morphing into?
Possibly two of the most boring biomes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests