## Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

PicturePerfect
Member
Posts: 152
Joined: November 6th, 2012, 7:01 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Location: *insert funny comment*
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Phys1cs wrote:tangentline, what is the way AP physics teaches?

next question:

What quantities do these units represent?
Amps, Farads, Ohms, Henry, Volts, Coulomb, and Watt?
```Amps: Current
Ohms: Resistance
Volts: Voltage
Henry: Inductance
Coulomb: Electric charge
Watt: Rate of energy conversion```
If this is right, someone else can post a question for me.
2012-2013 Event Name | Best Finish |
Heredity | 2nd
Forestry | 3rd
Food Science | 5th
Team | 1st

2013-2014 Event Name | Best Finish |
Heredity | 4th
Water Quality | 7th
Shock Value | 7th
Wheeled Vehicle | 7th

2014-2015 Event Name | Best Finish |

tangentline
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: September 29th, 2012, 6:17 pm
State: CA
Location: Sacramento
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Assuming at t=0, these capacitors are uncharged
Ignoring the right branch with the 500 ohm resistor as if it was not there, write a function of the voltage vs. time across the 10 amp source.

Completely optional, just food for thought: Don't ignore the right branch and find the current through R1 as a function of time (or at an arbitrary time value say 5 seconds). Unless there is a way to use "formulas" in some fancy way, it's going to take some differential equation knowledge.

Bozongle
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: January 20th, 2013, 12:41 pm
Division: B
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Let's get a bit of Shock Value/magnetism in here.

You have two electromagnets. Electromagnet A and Electromagnet B. They both have the same number of turns (N=100), same current going through them (I=1A), and same metal cores (Iron). However, Electromagnet A is half the length of Electromagnet B. Which one has the greater magnetic field, and why?

Phys1cs
Member
Posts: 129
Joined: November 10th, 2013, 6:53 pm
State: MD
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Bozongle wrote:Let's get a bit of Shock Value/magnetism in here.

You have two electromagnets. Electromagnet A and Electromagnet B. They both have the same number of turns (N=100), same current going through them (I=1A), and same metal cores (Iron). However, Electromagnet A is half the length of Electromagnet B. Which one has the greater magnetic field, and why?
[hide]Electromagnet A, because the magnetic field is equal number of turns*I*perm. of free space is divided by the length. If you have a larger length (as does em B) then there will be a smaller magnetic field. Therefore, em A has a larger magnetic field [/hide]

Isn't this more of a Maglev question? I have never seen something like this on my circuits tests, but this equation comes up all the time in my MagLev tests

Bozongle
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: January 20th, 2013, 12:41 pm
Division: B
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Phys1cs wrote:
Bozongle wrote:Let's get a bit of Shock Value/magnetism in here.

You have two electromagnets. Electromagnet A and Electromagnet B. They both have the same number of turns (N=100), same current going through them (I=1A), and same metal cores (Iron). However, Electromagnet A is half the length of Electromagnet B. Which one has the greater magnetic field, and why?
[hide]Electromagnet A, because the magnetic field is equal number of turns*I*perm. of free space is divided by the length. If you have a larger length (as does em B) then there will be a smaller magnetic field. Therefore, em A has a larger magnetic field [/hide]

Isn't this more of a Maglev question? I have never seen something like this on my circuits tests, but this equation comes up all the time in my MagLev tests
It's a Shock Value question, as the event includes 50% circuits and 50% magnetism.

It's basically the division B combination of Circuit Lab and Maglev

Phys1cs
Member
Posts: 129
Joined: November 10th, 2013, 6:53 pm
State: MD
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Bozongle wrote:
Phys1cs wrote:
Bozongle wrote:Let's get a bit of Shock Value/magnetism in here.

You have two electromagnets. Electromagnet A and Electromagnet B. They both have the same number of turns (N=100), same current going through them (I=1A), and same metal cores (Iron). However, Electromagnet A is half the length of Electromagnet B. Which one has the greater magnetic field, and why?
[hide]Electromagnet A, because the magnetic field is equal number of turns*I*perm. of free space is divided by the length. If you have a larger length (as does em B) then there will be a smaller magnetic field. Therefore, em A has a larger magnetic field [/hide]

Isn't this more of a Maglev question? I have never seen something like this on my circuits tests, but this equation comes up all the time in my MagLev tests
It's a Shock Value question, as the event includes 50% circuits and 50% magnetism.

It's basically the division B combination of Circuit Lab and Maglev
Oh, okay! Makes sense.

phil9047
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: October 14th, 2013, 12:33 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Since nobody has been posting questions, I will post a question that I recently encountered.
Design a circuit with a light bulb and two switches such that each time a switch is changed, the state of the light bulb is changed (aka on to off or off to on). It should be energy-conservative, meaning that you should not have short circuits at any point.
`Think about different types of switches`
Sine functions are quite odd, to be honest.

tangentline
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: September 29th, 2012, 6:17 pm
State: CA
Location: Sacramento
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

phil9047 wrote:Since nobody has been posting questions, I will post a question that I recently encountered.
Design a circuit with a light bulb and two switches such that each time a switch is changed, the state of the light bulb is changed (aka on to off or off to on). It should be energy-conservative, meaning that you should not have short circuits at any point.
`Think about different types of switches`
I went off to think and wanted to short circuit that freaking lightbulb so badly and came back here looking at the rules
--And I also wondered what would happen if I opened the switch that I just closed to make it light go on what would happen (LOL, a little brain mesh up)

Probably cheating, because I can imagine a switch that can have a million different states and want a simple answer:
Two switches as inputs to an exclusive or gate!

Bozongle
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: January 20th, 2013, 12:41 pm
Division: B
State: IN
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Well thing is are you supplied a logic gate to work with? Im not sure if that's in the context of the problem

I think I found the answer, couldn't you connect two SPDT switches together then in series with the light bulb?

Every time one switch changes the state of the light bulb is changed.

Here's a pic for reference (pardon my terrible paint skills):

phil9047
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: October 14th, 2013, 12:33 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

### Re: Shock Value B/Circuit Lab C Question Marathon

Bozongle, that is correct. I couldn't figure it out, but my dad, an electrical engineer, also came up with the same circuit design. 2 SPDT switches together in series with lightbulb. Your turn to question.
Sine functions are quite odd, to be honest.

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests