## Technical Problem Solving

Flavorflav
Member
Posts: 1335
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

adam124218 wrote:I would doubt that there would be calculus, at least on regionals tests. Many event coordinators will assume that the average person in this event isn't going to have taken calculus (even though they probably have) and will exclude it. At state when motion detectors can be used, they may have probeware that can take data for velocity and acceleration. I would only say there would be about a 10-20 percent chance of calculus.

I would say 0% - 1% that calc would be required at NY States and at nationals. Of course, sometimes you can use calc when it isn't required, but I would give long odds that they are not going to write an event which requires calculus.

rocketchicka
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: February 2nd, 2009, 2:09 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Location: earth
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

We got 2nd at regionals. It was fun and I knew most of the stuff on the test. It was things like calculating trajectory and volume and things like that.
2010 Events-State Results:

17th Mission Possible
7th Egg-O-Naut
32nd Technical Problem Solving
18th Remote Sensing

Glacierguy1
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: March 16th, 2006, 5:08 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Location: LI,NY
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Calculating volume of what?
SAVE OUR GLACIERS.

jazzy009
Member
Posts: 474
Joined: January 3rd, 2009, 1:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: -
Location: AJAX Chat
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

at the lake conference comp for us the test was extremely filled with physics. written by a physics teacher, we later found out. Is it this "physics-filled" elsewhere or did we just get a somewhat odd test?
Call me coach.

Flavorflav
Member
Posts: 1335
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

jazzy009 wrote:at the lake conference comp for us the test was extremely filled with physics. written by a physics teacher, we later found out. Is it this "physics-filled" elsewhere or did we just get a somewhat odd test?

Somewhat odd, I think, but it depends a lot on who writes it. It's a pretty wide-open event.

rocketchicka
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: February 2nd, 2009, 2:09 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Location: earth
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Glacierguy1 wrote:Calculating volume of what?

The volume of a chunk of quartz using one method and a wooden cylinder using another.
2010 Events-State Results:

17th Mission Possible
7th Egg-O-Naut
32nd Technical Problem Solving
18th Remote Sensing

fee6
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: February 24th, 2009, 6:24 pm
Division: C
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Ours was much more difficult. There was lots of pretty advanced physics, but I think we did pretty well. Results pending.

Flavorflav
Member
Posts: 1335
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

fee6 wrote:Ours was much more difficult. There was lots of pretty advanced physics, but I think we did pretty well. Results pending.

Could you be any more specific? Like, what kind of physics? Also, what tournament was it?

fee6
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: February 24th, 2009, 6:24 pm
Division: C
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Flavorflav wrote:
fee6 wrote:Ours was much more difficult. There was lots of pretty advanced physics, but I think we did pretty well. Results pending.

Could you be any more specific? Like, what kind of physics? Also, what tournament was it?

Regionals - there was an easy one about experimentally determining coefficient of kinetic friction, then a harder one about resolving a big brain hurting complex DC circuit, then finally one asking you to calculate gravitational potential using two masses with given spherical coordinates.
Looking back, it wasn't that hard, but you would have had to take Physics B or C before probably.
2nd place on the event.

Valpo Towers and Trebs
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: March 4th, 2006, 6:27 pm
State: -
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

So I take back what I said about probably not needing calculus in this event because on the regional test I took last saturday for a few of the problems it said specifically that you had to use calculus to solve them. We got them, but I felt bad for the younger ones in the room because that's not exactly fair to them.
you stay classy, planet earth!

Flavorflav
Member
Posts: 1335
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

I do not think that it is in keeping with the spirit of the event to require calculus.

tad_k_22
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: March 29th, 2005, 11:24 am
Division: Grad
State: -
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Agreed, but there should be problems where calculus would get you a quicker answer, but it should not be necessary.
Old Events:
Astronomy, Remote Sensing (Both Mars and Global Warming), Dynamic Planet (Oceanography/Earthquakes and Volcanoes), It's About Time, Technical Problem Solving, and I really don't want to count, but did fail at-Fermi Questions.

soroco120
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: March 3rd, 2009, 7:33 am
Division: C
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Yeah I had a tournament today, and did really badly, especially in this event. Does anybody have any tips on improving/practicing this event?
Any help or advice would be appreciated.

Freak of Science
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: October 29th, 2008, 5:12 am
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Technical Problem Solving (at least, by my knowledge of two invitationals) is a combination of high level Chemistry and Physics-related math, as well as a commercial for Texas Instruments (analyzing data from a TI-81 Calculator attachment, ect.).

ahage16
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 2:02 pm
Division: C
Contact:

### Re: Technical Problem Solving

Competed in this on Saturday. It seemed ridiculously easy, but we ended up getting 14th. Since there are no specifics on scoring, I'd imagine it was all very close at the top because there was nothing complicated involved. Some things we had to calculate: Density, gravitational acceleration using a pendulum, average weight of candy, volume change in gas at different temperatures, and something else I don't remember

Return to “2009 Lab Events”

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests