Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Locked
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2499
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 795 times
Contact:

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by bernard »

davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
User avatar
davidkim2106
Member
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: February 10th, 2012, 4:27 pm
Division: C
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by davidkim2106 »

boomvroomshroom wrote:
davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
You could go in the image gallery.
Keep in mind I said pictures of their devices :)
bernard wrote:
davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.
Thanks bernard :) Could you explain what the little things above the levers are? Also, where would you attach the masses? I don't see hooks

EDIT: nvm i see them, thanks :)
Sup.
User avatar
chinesesushi
Member
Member
Posts: 259
Joined: September 17th, 2013, 4:57 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by chinesesushi »

bernard wrote:
davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.
Thanks bernard :) Could you explain what the little things above the levers are? Also, where would you attach the masses? I don't see hooks

EDIT: nvm i see them, thanks :)
I believe those are levels that he uses to see whether the system of levers is in equilibrium or not, for more accuracy.
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
You should only create problems, that only you know solutions to.
goodcheer
Member
Member
Posts: 155
Joined: October 27th, 2012, 7:09 am
Division: B
State: KY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by goodcheer »

bernard wrote:
davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.

Bernard, I understand how the first class lever can rest in equilibrium, but how about the second class lever? Do you have a fixed counter-weight attached to it to the right of the fulcrum or do you adjust the first class lever to the point where it can balance the second class lever? Anyone else with idea please help. We just got someone new on this event. Thanks.
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2499
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 795 times
Contact:

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by bernard »

goodcheer wrote:
bernard wrote:
davidkim2106 wrote:Anyone have any pictures of their device?
A link to a picture of the device I made for our team.

Bernard, I understand how the first class lever can rest in equilibrium, but how about the second class lever? Do you have a fixed counter-weight attached to it to the right of the fulcrum or do you adjust the first class lever to the point where it can balance the second class lever? Anyone else with idea please help. We just got someone new on this event. Thanks.
Yes, a fixed counterweight would let the second class lever rest in equilibrium, which would hopefully allow for more accurate predictions.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1597
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F »

So... Apparently, there was a conflict, and now, I'm doing Simple Machines. What kinds of things should I do for simple machine concepts and terminology?
chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by chalker »

bernard wrote: Yes, a fixed counterweight would let the second class lever rest in equilibrium, which would hopefully allow for more accurate predictions.
But then it might not be considered a true 2nd class lever anymore... more like a hybrid 1st/2nd class lever....

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
User avatar
bernard
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2499
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 3:12 pm
Division: Grad
State: WA
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 795 times
Contact:

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by bernard »

chalker wrote:
bernard wrote: Yes, a fixed counterweight would let the second class lever rest in equilibrium, which would hopefully allow for more accurate predictions.
But then it might not be considered a true 2nd class lever anymore... more like a hybrid 1st/2nd class lever....
By the FAQ that states the the 40cm of the class 2 lever is just the distance between the fulcrum and effort points, could I call an 80cm beam a class 2 lever if the load and effort are on the same side of the fulcrum? I suppose the picture of our device I posted a while ago could be considered a hybrid since there is 5cm of meterstick opposite to the 40cm class 2 lever.
"One of the ways that I believe people express their appreciation to the rest of humanity is to make something wonderful and put it out there." – Steve Jobs
joeyjoejoe
Member
Member
Posts: 142
Joined: December 27th, 2012, 12:56 pm
Division: C
State: GA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by joeyjoejoe »

Even with that definition, I would consider the class 2 lever actually a class 1 lever. It never even crossed our minds to build ours that way. Placing a counterbalance on a class 1 lever doesn't change its type but doing so with a class 2 arguably does.
chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2107
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C

Post by chalker »

bernard wrote: By the FAQ that states the the 40cm of the class 2 lever is just the distance between the fulcrum and effort points, could I call an 80cm beam a class 2 lever if the load and effort are on the same side of the fulcrum? I suppose the picture of our device I posted a while ago could be considered a hybrid since there is 5cm of meterstick opposite to the 40cm class 2 lever.
As always, this isn't the place for official clarifications / comments.... Note that the purpose of that FAQ was to make it easier for people to construct the levers. It's REALLY hard to come up with a design that has the fulcrum exactly at the edge of the beam for example. Having a little bit of extra material overhanging the fulcrum doesn't significantly impact the functionality of the lever.

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
Locked

Return to “2015 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests