Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
-
- Member
- Posts: 121
- Joined: May 9th, 2014, 3:34 am
- Division: Grad
- State: VA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I was intending for one of the two of you to post a question, but I can do another one if you'd like - what would you prefer?
MIT ‘23
TJHSST ‘19
Longfellow MS
See my user page for nationals medals and event supervising experience.
TJHSST ‘19
Longfellow MS
See my user page for nationals medals and event supervising experience.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
I'm a little bit, err.... preoccupied (code phrase for "I'm on vacation"). Why don't you post a question?mjcox2000 wrote:I was intending for one of the two of you to post a question, but I can do another one if you'd like - what would you prefer?
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4342
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Ok then:
If M2 has a mass of 20.0 kg, and for all pulleys the mass is 1.00 kg and the efficiency is 90.0%, solve for the mass of M1 needed to balance the system (with proper significant figures) (assume all ropes are exactly vertical; I'm not sure how them being at angles would affect the system).
If M2 has a mass of 20.0 kg, and for all pulleys the mass is 1.00 kg and the efficiency is 90.0%, solve for the mass of M1 needed to balance the system (with proper significant figures) (assume all ropes are exactly vertical; I'm not sure how them being at angles would affect the system).
- Attachments
-
- Untitled.png (8.37 KiB) Viewed 3183 times
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
So, I'm guessing I have to use gravity:Unome wrote:Ok then:
If M2 has a mass of 20.0 kg, and for all pulleys the mass is 1.00 kg and the efficiency is 90.0%, solve for the mass of M1 needed to balance the system (with proper significant figures) (assume all ropes are exactly vertical; I'm not sure how them being at angles would affect the system).
IMA = 2*1*2*1*1 = 4 20.0/4.00=5.00 5.00*0.90=[b]4.5 kg[/b]
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4342
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Incorrect; You don't need gravity to do this.UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:So, I'm guessing I have to use gravity:Unome wrote:Ok then:
If M2 has a mass of 20.0 kg, and for all pulleys the mass is 1.00 kg and the efficiency is 90.0%, solve for the mass of M1 needed to balance the system (with proper significant figures) (assume all ropes are exactly vertical; I'm not sure how them being at angles would affect the system).I don't remember how to calculate with gravity. Oh well.IMA = 2*1*2*1*1 = 4 20.0/4.00=5.00 5.00*0.90=[b]4.5 kg[/b]
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Unome wrote:Incorrect; You don't need gravity to do this.UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:So, I'm guessing I have to use gravity:Unome wrote:Ok then:
If M2 has a mass of 20.0 kg, and for all pulleys the mass is 1.00 kg and the efficiency is 90.0%, solve for the mass of M1 needed to balance the system (with proper significant figures) (assume all ropes are exactly vertical; I'm not sure how them being at angles would affect the system).I don't remember how to calculate with gravity. Oh well.IMA = 2*1*2*1*1 = 4 20.0/4.00=5.00 5.00*0.90=[b]4.5 kg[/b]
20.0+1.00=21 21/2=10.5 10.5*2=21.0 21.0/0.90=[b]23.3 kg[/b]
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4342
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Nope. Try doing it backwards or upside down; it helps to have a comparison. Also, every pulley has a separate efficiency of 90%, so they have to be calculated one by one. Thinking about how efficiency actually functions would also help.UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:Unome wrote:Incorrect; You don't need gravity to do this.UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote: So, I'm guessing I have to use gravity:I don't remember how to calculate with gravity. Oh well.IMA = 2*1*2*1*1 = 4 20.0/4.00=5.00 5.00*0.90=[b]4.5 kg[/b]Probably not right... I can't figure out the MA for the second pulley from the right.20.0+1.00=21 21/2=10.5 10.5*2=21.0 21.0/0.90=[b]23.3 kg[/b]
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
20/2=10 10/0.9=100/9 (100/9)/0.9=1000/81 (1000/81)/0.9=10000/729 10000/729*2=20000/729 (20000/729)/0.9=200000/6561=[b]30.5 kg[/b]
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4342
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Unless I'm doing it wrong (and I don't think I am) no. I think you're messing up somewhere in the beginning.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Simple Machines B/Compound Machines C
Are the masses of the pulleys relevant?Unome wrote:Unless I'm doing it wrong (and I don't think I am) no. I think you're messing up somewhere in the beginning.
7.62 kg? I'm honestly thinking of just giving up and posting another question.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests