Scioly.org

Jaol wrote:Did you forget Auburn on that list?

Auburn's not exactly so good that you'd have to forget it; it's likely intentional.

Shots fired!!!! BOOM BOOM BOOM

I wouldn't put you in my top 10 either .

sciolyboy123 wrote:Shots fired!!!! BOOM BOOM BOOM

I wouldn't put you in my top 10 either .

I would agree with you there; we're not motivated enough for that.

XD. But don't you guys in Auburn split your teams? So aren't you guys better than we've seen you at the tourney's we go to?
Our team might get into top 20 do.

Jaol wrote:XD. But don't you guys in Auburn split your teams? So aren't you guys better than we've seen you at the tourney's we go to?
Our team might get into top 20 do.

Yes, we do split our teams. At the invitationals this year half of the good people are on one team and the other half on the other team, plus we did no builds. Without all this, you actually can't see how good we are unless you make assumptions. This year though, a 12th place finish is what I think. We are slightly worse than last year.

Didn't Longfellow place like 20th last year?
Did they get better at building?

SpamMer101 wrote:Didn't Longfellow place like 20th last year?
Did they get better at building?

Check earlier. In 2012 they placed 8th at Nationals with a point score of 45-50 at state (I can't remember exactly); this year they had a point score of 50 at state, so they should do reasonably well at Nationals; for the past three years their state score has been somewhat aligned with their place at Nationals.

Is anyone else a bit nervous about the Illinois schools?

Strawberri19 wrote:Is anyone else a bit nervous about the Illinois schools?

Isn't everyone?

1: beckendorff (dominated state tourn.)
2: solon
3: meads mill
4: piedmont
5: daniel wright