Page 1 of 12
Fossils B/C
Posted: August 22nd, 2015, 2:46 pm
by robotman
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 8th, 2015, 12:47 pm
by bernard
Official
Fossil List for 2016 posted to the national website!
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 8th, 2015, 1:16 pm
by Unome
I'm pretty sure that Septastraea hasn't changed from last year, so I'm wondering why that's marked (it's probably just an oversight though).
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 11th, 2015, 2:09 pm
by bearasauras
The first rules clarification for the year has been posted
The correct spelling for Sarcoptergii (on the Official Fossil List on
http://www.soinc.org) is
Sarcopterygii
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 11th, 2015, 3:00 pm
by Unome
Russian Fusulinid diagrams!
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 17th, 2015, 2:03 pm
by Entomology
Does anyone know a field guide with plants? I'm using the Audubon and there are only a couple. :/
Side note: The state test for us had rocks and minerals..?
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 17th, 2015, 3:13 pm
by varunscs11
I think the Smithsonian has more plants than the Audubon. Also its normal for tests to test you over rocks because that is part of the rules. As for minerals, it would be more sketchy cause the rules don't explicitly state identification of minerals but if its like calcite then it should pass
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 21st, 2015, 5:46 pm
by GoofyFoofer
So what do we index fossils? Do we have to know all major index fossils, or only the ones on the list?
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 21st, 2015, 5:48 pm
by varunscs11
There are index fossils on the list (like explicitly stated)? Waht? But nonetheless, I use the index fossils chart from chart, but after a while its just intuitive.
Re: Fossils B/C
Posted: September 22nd, 2015, 7:15 pm
by GoofyFoofer
varunscs11 wrote:There are index fossils on the list (like explicitly stated)? Waht? But nonetheless, I use the index fossils chart from chart, but after a while its just intuitive.
Huh, I did not see that...
Thanks, though!