Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

A forum for those Word Games that plague the Earth.
User avatar
dudeincolorado
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 595
Joined: January 31st, 2007, 6:27 pm
Division: C
State: CO
Location: Hope it's somewhere good. :)

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby dudeincolorado » September 11th, 2008, 5:43 pm

im confused what happend?
SO stressed!

User avatar
Assasinator
Member
Member
Posts: 0
Joined: June 17th, 2008, 8:41 am

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby Assasinator » September 11th, 2008, 5:53 pm

Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.
oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.
This Account has been deactivated. Ignore any posts made from it. If you want to talk to the current Assassinator, send a PM to the Assassinator Account. If you have a complaint about the current Assassinator, PM a former Assassinator such as Skystrider or Rocketman.

User avatar
gneissisnice
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 927
Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Location: Long Island

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby gneissisnice » September 11th, 2008, 6:15 pm

Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats

User avatar
sachleen
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 215
Joined: April 10th, 2007, 8:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Contact:

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby sachleen » September 11th, 2008, 6:53 pm

Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.
oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.
ok, dude, you can stop playing it now, they KNOW the secret... :) I didnt 'panic'...

rocketman1555
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 577
Joined: September 10th, 2006, 8:21 am
Division: Grad
Location: The Library
Contact:

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby rocketman1555 » September 11th, 2008, 6:56 pm

so are we starting another assasination game, or is it over for a while?
I am a practitioner of the art of magic known as science.

User avatar
Assasinator
Member
Member
Posts: 0
Joined: June 17th, 2008, 8:41 am

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby Assasinator » September 11th, 2008, 6:59 pm

Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?
Your being sarcastic I hope because you should know that's not a correct because statement. It's common sense the accusation has to have a good reason behind it not "just cause" or "for the heck of it".
This Account has been deactivated. Ignore any posts made from it. If you want to talk to the current Assassinator, send a PM to the Assassinator Account. If you have a complaint about the current Assassinator, PM a former Assassinator such as Skystrider or Rocketman.

User avatar
gneissisnice
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 927
Joined: March 11th, 2008, 9:10 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Location: Long Island

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby gneissisnice » September 12th, 2008, 5:40 pm

Sigh. Nevermind. Anyway, since I got it right, do I get to choose the next assassinator?
2009 events:
Fossils: 1st @ reg. 3rd @ states (stupid dinosaurs...) 5th @ nats.
Dynamic: 1st @ reg. 19thish @ states, 18th @ nats
Herpetology (NOT the study of herpes): NA
Enviro Chem: 39th @ states =(
Cell Bio: 9th @ reg. 18th @ nats
Remote: 6th @ states 3rd @ Nats
Ecology: 5th @ Nats

starpug
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 932
Joined: April 5th, 2008, 6:51 pm
Division: Grad
State: ME
Location: Waterville, Maine

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby starpug » September 12th, 2008, 6:11 pm

You didn't get it right :P
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain

User avatar
vofbassist
Member
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: September 2nd, 2008, 12:25 pm
Division: Grad
State: WI
Location: Boyceville, WI

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby vofbassist » September 12th, 2008, 6:22 pm

so who gets to pick then

User avatar
sachleen
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 215
Joined: April 10th, 2007, 8:31 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA
Contact:

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Postby sachleen » September 12th, 2008, 7:54 pm

technically, im still an officer.... and i did rat out starpug with a valid because statement, explaining exactly what happened... so... yeah :P

just in case "I ACCUSE STARPUG OF BEING THE ASSASSINATOR BECAUSE I WAS THE PREVIOUS ASSASSINATOR AND I ALWAYS KNEW IT WAS HIM" there :P... i think this game is way beyond over now... lol.. just in case it isn't, i vote that gneissisnice gets to pick the next assassinator.


Return to “Posting Games”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests