Page 13 of 15

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 11th, 2008, 5:43 pm
by dudeincolorado
im confused what happend?

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 11th, 2008, 5:53 pm
by Assasinator
Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.
oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 11th, 2008, 6:15 pm
by gneissisnice
Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 11th, 2008, 6:53 pm
by sachleen
Yes gneissisnice you did say that but look you said your logic is bad so you essentially said that your because was invalid yourself. Without a because statement your accusation can't be accepted. If you had simply just changed your because to something else it would have been accepted. I do commende you though you were able to get kube to panic and hijack the account.
oh wait, my logic is bad, rocketman1555 was the only one to use the Assassinator one. Though he HAS been eerily quiet during this whole scenario....my apologies starpug, but i'll keep my accusation up anyway, for the heck of it.
ok, dude, you can stop playing it now, they KNOW the secret... :) I didnt 'panic'...

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 11th, 2008, 6:56 pm
by rocketman1555
so are we starting another assasination game, or is it over for a while?

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 11th, 2008, 6:59 pm
by Assasinator
Sure I had a because statement. It was 'for the heck of it". Thats a good because, right?
Your being sarcastic I hope because you should know that's not a correct because statement. It's common sense the accusation has to have a good reason behind it not "just cause" or "for the heck of it".

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 12th, 2008, 5:40 pm
by gneissisnice
Sigh. Nevermind. Anyway, since I got it right, do I get to choose the next assassinator?

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 12th, 2008, 6:11 pm
by starpug
You didn't get it right :P

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 12th, 2008, 6:22 pm
by vofbassist
so who gets to pick then

Re: Scioly Assassination Number 8:Redemption

Posted: September 12th, 2008, 7:54 pm
by sachleen
technically, im still an officer.... and i did rat out starpug with a valid because statement, explaining exactly what happened... so... yeah :P

just in case "I ACCUSE STARPUG OF BEING THE ASSASSINATOR BECAUSE I WAS THE PREVIOUS ASSASSINATOR AND I ALWAYS KNEW IT WAS HIM" there :P... i think this game is way beyond over now... lol.. just in case it isn't, i vote that gneissisnice gets to pick the next assassinator.