I found Div B rather hard this year. Div C was a lot easier for me than in the past though.kate! wrote:Trying to fill out the event and placing predictions for nationals has made me realize how much I don't actually know about any teams that aren't Gelinas and any events from other schools that aren't done by the people I know.
Build Event Predictions honestly felt like guessing and slapping in teams who I knew where good.Unome wrote:I found Div B rather hard this year. Div C was a lot easier for me than in the past though.kate! wrote:Trying to fill out the event and placing predictions for nationals has made me realize how much I don't actually know about any teams that aren't Gelinas and any events from other schools that aren't done by the people I know.
Building Event Predictions were extremely difficult though.
[b]2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd 2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th 2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th 2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place! 2019 Astronomy Nationals - 3rd! 2019 Nationals - Team 9th Place! [/b]
Isn't that usually how normal predictions are made?antoine_ego wrote: Build Event Predictions honestly felt like guessing and slapping in teams who I knew where good.
...nowhythelongface wrote:Isn't that usually how normal predictions are made?antoine_ego wrote: Build Event Predictions honestly felt like guessing and slapping in teams who I knew where good.
It's probably because I don't know the individual strengths of a school well enough...Unome wrote:...nowhythelongface wrote:Isn't that usually how normal predictions are made?antoine_ego wrote: Build Event Predictions honestly felt like guessing and slapping in teams who I knew where good.
The best way is typically to narrow it down by picking non-top tier teams that are really good at some events (e.g. Fulton Science Academy in WIDI) and saving teams like Troy or such for when you can't think of anyone else.whythelongface wrote:It's probably because I don't know the individual strengths of a school well enough...Unome wrote:...nowhythelongface wrote: Isn't that usually how normal predictions are made?
Unome wrote:The best way is typically to narrow it down by picking non-top tier teams that are really good at some events (e.g. Fulton Science Academy in WIDI) and saving teams like Troy or such for when you can't think of anyone else.whythelongface wrote:It's probably because I don't know the individual strengths of a school well enough...Unome wrote: ...no
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
