Game On C

Skink
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 948
Joined: February 8th, 2009, 12:23 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Game On C

Post by Skink »

I believe #2 is spatial, not functional. Graphical programmers make a big stink about (what's the adverbial form of ugly?) uglily-arranged code. Even if functional, it can't be reliably read by anyone else or the original programmer 6mo later.

For #3, show; don't tell! It's arbitrary, but trust that the supervisor has enough content area expertise and creativity to 'get' whatever you're driving at. Well, if you want to do some gentle telling, the instructions are an opportunity for that without getting long-winded or heavy-handed.
BananaPirate
Member
Member
Posts: 40
Joined: February 26th, 2014, 4:01 pm
Division: C
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by BananaPirate »

Skink wrote:I believe #2 is spatial, not functional. Graphical programmers make a big stink about (what's the adverbial form of ugly?) uglily-arranged code. Even if functional, it can't be reliably read by anyone else or the original programmer 6mo later.

For #3, show; don't tell! It's arbitrary, but trust that the supervisor has enough content area expertise and creativity to 'get' whatever you're driving at. Well, if you want to do some gentle telling, the instructions are an opportunity for that without getting long-winded or heavy-handed.
Actually, I think the "no overlapping code" part does mean functional.
First off, the subtitle is "Coding is efficient" which in my mind means that you aren't repeatedly using roundabout ways to get something done when there is clearly an easier solution. Also, the sub section has 4 points. 2 are for "no overlapping of code" and 2 are for "all code must be individually visible". It wouldn't make sense to award all 4 points for just having the code not overlap. Also there would be no need for 2 different descriptions then. In terms of spatial order and organization, the subsection above titled "Elements are Logically Grouped and Organized" already covers that.
Also, I think the understanding of the code by others is what logical ordering and comments are for.

I have another question though. Do you guys usually get points for advanced user controlled sprite movement if you have diagonal movement? It's really easy to incorporate, and I don't think the proctors I've had count it.
schist99centz
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: March 25th, 2014, 11:38 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by schist99centz »

I usually get 4 points in that section. 3 for movement complexity and 1 for sprite orientation. I use diagonal movement also so either I don't get the point from that or I lose a point because my sprite's movement apparently isn't smooth.

How do you guys get your points in graphics? I always get 6/12 points on this section. I've been told to draw all of my sprites but is there more to it than just that?
Skink
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 948
Joined: February 8th, 2009, 12:23 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Game On C

Post by Skink »

Yeah, I concede that possibility. It doesn't, really, matter, because you shouldn't be "overlapping" in either manner :P .

Advanced movement is game-dependent. Showing off that you know how to do this or that won't impress someone if it's shoehorned in there. And, I don't see too many games that would benefit from this versus a responsive WASD configuration.

I'm not touching graphics...
AznPr0d1gy
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: December 28th, 2013, 1:02 pm
Division: C
State: TX
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by AznPr0d1gy »

You can get full points in complexity of movement by implementing acceleration and nice collision detection. Although it takes around 6-8 minutes to implement both entirely since the code is quite complicated (involves 2 different variables, and a few purple blocks for modulating).
BananaPirate
Member
Member
Posts: 40
Joined: February 26th, 2014, 4:01 pm
Division: C
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by BananaPirate »

Skink wrote:Yeah, I concede that possibility. It doesn't, really, matter, because you shouldn't be "overlapping" in either manner :P .

Advanced movement is game-dependent. Showing off that you know how to do this or that won't impress someone if it's shoehorned in there. And, I don't see too many games that would benefit from this versus a responsive WASD configuration.

I'm not touching graphics...
No actually that's what I'm talking about. WASD keys usually allow for pretty smooth diagonal movement, so I'm confused why it doesn't get counted.
User avatar
Sleepy
Member
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: January 17th, 2017, 3:03 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by Sleepy »

What are some other ways to get environment interactions into your game besides making a "kill zone" in your backdrop a specific color and then use the "touching color" block to make them lose the game. It seems that if I don't do this, I get a 0/2 for environment interactions.
Stroudsburg HS '18
[size=80][u]MC Barons | Tiger | North Pocono | Regionals | States[/u]
Dynamic: 2 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 9
Remote: 9 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 8
Hydro: 11 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 2
Game On: 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 21[/size]
[size=80][u]North Pocono | Regionals | States[/u]
Dynamic: 1 | 2 | -
Remote: 2 | 1 | -
Game On: 3 | 4 | -[/size]
schist99centz
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: March 25th, 2014, 11:38 am
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by schist99centz »

Sleepy wrote:What are some other ways to get environment interactions into your game besides making a "kill zone" in your backdrop a specific color and then use the "touching color" block to make them lose the game. It seems that if I don't do this, I get a 0/2 for environment interactions.
I have always got 0/2 on environment interactions so I can't help there, but your idea seems fine to get 2/2.
For my UC Sprite movement, should I use arrow keys or WASD? It was mentioned above that WASD has smooth movement but I'm not sure if there's a difference between them and arrow keys.
kenniky
Member
Member
Posts: 283
Joined: January 21st, 2016, 6:16 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by kenniky »

There's no functional difference but it's more natural to use the left hand to move imo
Automated Event Assigner!
UMich 2018: Chem Lab, Fermi

[url=http://tinyurl.com/kenniky-so-test]Rate my tests![/url]
[url]https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Kenniky[/url]

[url=https://scioly.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10008&start=34]2017 Nats = rip[/url]
[url=https://youtu.be/MCo8IAovjfw]ABRHS 2016[/url]
DaPlug
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: March 9th, 2016, 10:14 pm
Division: C
State: CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Game On C

Post by DaPlug »

Does anyone know any invite themes given this year for Game On?
Mira Loma High School
2016:
Air Trajectory/Robot Arm/Wright Stuff/Game On
Regionals: 7/2/2/1
States: 3/2/4/2
Nationals: 4/1/3/-
Locked

Return to “2017 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests