Astronomy C

Test your knowledge of various Science Olympiad events.
Locked
User avatar
bhavjain
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: February 20th, 2015, 7:30 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Astronomy C

Post by bhavjain » November 21st, 2016, 6:16 pm

What is the typical density of a white dwarf?

jonboyage
Member
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: December 13th, 2016, 8:32 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Astronomy C

Post by jonboyage » December 13th, 2016, 8:36 am

Why is carbon monoxide an indicator of molecular hydrogen in interstellar dust clouds?

User avatar
Magikarpmaster629
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 578
Joined: October 7th, 2014, 3:03 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA
Location: No idea, but I can tell you exactly how fast I'm going
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Magikarpmaster629 » December 27th, 2016, 5:52 pm

jonboyage wrote:Why is carbon monoxide an indicator of molecular hydrogen in interstellar dust clouds?
This doesn't really pertain to the rules this year, but I suspect because carbon monoxide and molecular hydrogen only form in relatively cool environments. Image
This image of a system 490 parsecs distant depicts HM Cancri. This system has an orbital period of 5.4 minutes and an angular separation of 1.02*10^-6 arcseconds. What is the total mass of the system?
Ladue Science Olympiad (2014ish-2017)

A wild goose flies over a pond, leaving behind a voice in the wind.
A man passes through this world, leaving behind a name.

User avatar
Adi1008
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 495
Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Austin, Texas
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Adi1008 » December 27th, 2016, 6:46 pm

Magikarpmaster629 wrote:
jonboyage wrote:Why is carbon monoxide an indicator of molecular hydrogen in interstellar dust clouds?
This doesn't really pertain to the rules this year, but I suspect because carbon monoxide and molecular hydrogen only form in relatively cool environments. Image
This image of a system 490 parsecs distant depicts HM Cancri. This system has an orbital period of 5.4 minutes and an angular separation of 1.02*10^-6 arcseconds. What is the total mass of the system?
1.18 solar masses
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14

User avatar
Magikarpmaster629
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 578
Joined: October 7th, 2014, 3:03 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA
Location: No idea, but I can tell you exactly how fast I'm going
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Magikarpmaster629 » December 28th, 2016, 6:43 am

Adi1008 wrote:
Magikarpmaster629 wrote:
jonboyage wrote:Why is carbon monoxide an indicator of molecular hydrogen in interstellar dust clouds?
This doesn't really pertain to the rules this year, but I suspect because carbon monoxide and molecular hydrogen only form in relatively cool environments. Image
This image of a system 490 parsecs distant depicts HM Cancri. This system has an orbital period of 5.4 minutes and an angular separation of 1.02*10^-6 arcseconds. What is the total mass of the system?
1.18 solar masses
yep
Ladue Science Olympiad (2014ish-2017)

A wild goose flies over a pond, leaving behind a voice in the wind.
A man passes through this world, leaving behind a name.

User avatar
Adi1008
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 495
Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Austin, Texas
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Adi1008 » December 28th, 2016, 12:27 pm

Magikarpmaster629 wrote:
Adi1008 wrote:
Magikarpmaster629 wrote: This doesn't really pertain to the rules this year, but I suspect because carbon monoxide and molecular hydrogen only form in relatively cool environments. Image
This image of a system 490 parsecs distant depicts HM Cancri. This system has an orbital period of 5.4 minutes and an angular separation of 1.02*10^-6 arcseconds. What is the total mass of the system?
1.18 solar masses
yep
Image
This figure shows maximum-light type Ia supernovae plotted with distance modulus on the x-axis and absolute B magnitude on the y-axis. Filled symbols are maximum–light SNe (174) and open symbols are limit SNe (395).

(a) What best explains the distribution falling off sharply at the brighter end?
(b) What do the slanted lines represent?
(c) There is a lack of dimmer supernovae found at farther distances. What would best explain this?
(d) What does the figure tell you about the frequency of superluminous (that is, unusually bright) type Ia supernovae? Essentially, in reality, are they more common, less common, or as common as one would expect from this figure?
(e) What is the name of the bias in (d)?
Last edited by Adi1008 on December 29th, 2016, 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14

User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4254
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Location: somewhere in the sciolyverse
Has thanked: 99 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Unome » December 29th, 2016, 12:17 pm

a) The Chandrasekhar limit. Type Ia supernovae brighter than roughly -19 magnitude are much more uncommon because they can't arise from mass accretion; they have to develop spontaneously or they will explode before they can get large enough to be over that magnitude.
b) Lines of equal temperature? (or something else like that, idk)
c) They are more difficult to detect because their apparent magnitude is much lower (probably a combination of being really dim and a lot of extinction).
d) No idea what this is even asking
e) Extinction bias? (maybe this is a real thing?)
Userpage
Chattahoochee High School Class of 2018
Georgia Tech Class of 2022

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

User avatar
Adi1008
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 495
Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Austin, Texas
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Adi1008 » December 29th, 2016, 4:07 pm

Unome wrote:
a) The Chandrasekhar limit. Type Ia supernovae brighter than roughly -19 magnitude are much more uncommon because they can't arise from mass accretion; they have to develop spontaneously or they will explode before they can get large enough to be over that magnitude.
b) Lines of equal temperature? (or something else like that, idk)
c) They are more difficult to detect because their apparent magnitude is much lower (probably a combination of being really dim and a lot of extinction).
d) No idea what this is even asking
e) Extinction bias? (maybe this is a real thing?)
a) I think this is pretty much it. Since the mass is limited by the Chandrasekhar limit, there's a hard physical limit to the amount of Nickel-56 that can be ejected during the supernova. Nickel-56 (and daughter Cobalt-56) is what powers the light curves of the supernova, so this serves as a hard limit for the maximum luminosity that the supernova can attain.
b) Good guess, but it's actually lines of consistent apparent magnitude! A harder followup question to this would be to calculate the specific apparent magnitude each line represents
c) That's pretty much it :)
d) Essentially, brighter objects are easier to discover, for obvious reasons. As a result, when you do surveys like this, you'll likely get most, if not all of the bright stuff, but you'll miss a lot of the dim stuff. As a result, the bright stuff will be overrepresented. In reality, superluminous supernovae are less common than one would initially predict from this plot. Since they already make up such a small fraction of the data, in real life, they are quite rare.
e) Malmquist bias!
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14

jonboyage
Member
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: December 13th, 2016, 8:32 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Astronomy C

Post by jonboyage » February 2nd, 2017, 8:33 am

Lets revive this

Do the light curves of type Ia supernovae drop faster when they have brighter or dimmer peak absolute magnitudes (example: -19.2 vs -18.7)?
I was in a bin

Rustin '19
UPenn '23

User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4254
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Location: somewhere in the sciolyverse
Has thanked: 99 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Astronomy C

Post by Unome » February 2nd, 2017, 8:41 am

dimmer drops faster?
Userpage
Chattahoochee High School Class of 2018
Georgia Tech Class of 2022

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

Locked

Return to “2017 Question Marathons”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest