Wow... I have to say, thats quite impressive. MIT is leagues ahead of the invites I have gone to, I have been taking medals with 1500-1700. Thanks for the info.ckssv07 wrote:I do not know whether the raw scores will be released or not but I placed fourth in the event with ~2320. Hope that helps.Complexity wrote:Are you allowed to tell raw scores, and if yes, does anyone know the tower scores?
MIT Invitational
-
- Member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: January 10th, 2017, 1:49 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
-
- Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: January 24th, 2017, 6:51 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
-
- Member
- Posts: 107
- Joined: October 17th, 2014, 8:49 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
I messaged the supervisor for the event (he made a spreadsheet of all the test/device scores). He might or might not update soon.peter_ni wrote:does anyone happen to know the raw scores for hovercraft?
UT Austin '19
Liberal Arts and Science Academy '15
Liberal Arts and Science Academy '15
-
- Member
- Posts: 284
- Joined: November 30th, 2015, 8:11 am
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: MIT Invitational
The least they could do is send you the 5th place trophy now
Lower Merion Class Of 2017
-
- Coach
- Posts: 346
- Joined: March 11th, 2014, 12:00 pm
- Division: C
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4342
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 239 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: MIT Invitational
No idea.JonB wrote:
Any idea what they are doing?
If anyone needs to look at the scores urgently, there's a copy on our team website news post.
-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 507
- Joined: March 21st, 2011, 1:31 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: MIT Invitational
Stephen Tang asked me to pass on the message that the reason for the display issues was that some supervisors accidentally un-verified their entered scores. Everything has now been restored.Unome wrote:No idea.JonB wrote:
Any idea what they are doing?
If anyone needs to look at the scores urgently, there's a copy on our team website news post.
Proud alumnus of Mounds View High School Science Olympiad, Arden Hills, MN
Co-founder of the MIT Science Olympiad Invitational Tournament: http://scioly.mit.edu/
Co-founder of the MIT Science Olympiad Invitational Tournament: http://scioly.mit.edu/
- Adi1008
- Moderator
- Posts: 526
- Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: MIT Invitational
Could you explain how you got the 35-39 range for the test? Quickly looking on Wolfram Alpha, it seems like the max test score just has to be more than 33ishkenniky wrote:Our B team got a mass score of 1860, time of 12.4 ==> 47.4435 on build. Our A team got a full mass score and a time score of 9 ==> 34 on buildjkang wrote:Troy destroyed everyone in terms of the test, according to the supervisor.antoine_ego wrote:Any idea what the top score for hovercraft test portion was? By my calculations from comparing our two teams, I think it's 35 which is what we got on the test. Is there any other score higher than this? That moment when you have perfect mass score but your hovercraft is still too fast and gets destroyed on time. Such is life.
Our A team got a 35 on test, our B team got a 26.
B team ended up 7th, A was 8th.
therefore 47.4435 + 50* 26/x is slightly larger than 34 + 50* 35/x (let's say the difference is 2 points, which is probably being somewhat generous)
Thus the max score is between 35 and 39
Stanford University
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14
- antoine_ego
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 387
- Joined: May 24th, 2016, 5:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: MIT Invitational
Well, I already got 35 on the test... The 39 is because we're guessing that the scores were reasonably close.Adi1008 wrote:Could you explain how you got the 35-39 range for the test? Quickly looking on Wolfram Alpha, it seems like the max test score just has to be more than 33ishkenniky wrote:Our B team got a mass score of 1860, time of 12.4 ==> 47.4435 on build. Our A team got a full mass score and a time score of 9 ==> 34 on buildjkang wrote: Troy destroyed everyone in terms of the test, according to the supervisor.
Our A team got a 35 on test, our B team got a 26.
B team ended up 7th, A was 8th.
therefore 47.4435 + 50* 26/x is slightly larger than 34 + 50* 35/x (let's say the difference is 2 points, which is probably being somewhat generous)
Thus the max score is between 35 and 39
Rest in Peace Len Joeris
Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Captain 17-19
[b]2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd 2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th 2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th 2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place! 2019 Astronomy Nationals - 3rd! 2019 Nationals - Team 9th Place! [/b]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests