I never really understood why all physics events have binders. We rarely used our hovercraft binder at all, except for maybe a few fluid dynamic questions. Asking trivial questions such as history and such seems pretty pointless and is the only purpose that binders serve for events like thermo. Wish they would just take out history and make it a limited notes event.knightmoves wrote:You could probably quite reasonably convert Thermo from a binder event to a two-sheets-of-paper event, and lose the trivia questions.
Thermodynamics B/C
- Riptide
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 202
- Joined: December 4th, 2017, 7:09 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 8 times
- Contact:
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
UC Berkeley
Seven Lakes High School '19
Seven Lakes High School '19
- Alex-RCHS
- Member
- Posts: 539
- Joined: November 4th, 2016, 3:46 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NC
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Agreed.Riptide wrote:I never really understood why all physics events have binders. We rarely used our hovercraft binder at all, except for maybe a few fluid dynamic questions. Asking trivial questions such as history and such seems pretty pointless and is the only purpose that binders serve for events like thermo. Wish they would just take out history and make it a limited notes event.knightmoves wrote:You could probably quite reasonably convert Thermo from a binder event to a two-sheets-of-paper event, and lose the trivia questions.
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Let me provide some perspective on why we do this (with a caveat that other national committees have different opinions on this):Riptide wrote: I never really understood why all physics events have binders. We rarely used our hovercraft binder at all, except for maybe a few fluid dynamic questions. Asking trivial questions such as history and such seems pretty pointless and is the only purpose that binders serve for events like thermo. Wish they would just take out history and make it a limited notes event.
1. It reduces the burden on the event supervisors, as they don't have to be checking for extra pages or notes or debate whether 2 single sided sheets of paper pasted together are the same as 1 double sided sheet of paper.
2. It reduces the burden on the competitors, as they don't have to worry about using super small fonts to squeeze more information onto their notes or make judgment calls about what to include and what not to include
3. Contrary to your hypothesis about the reason being history, it pushes good event supervisors to create tests with more analysis and applied type questions instead of just reciting facts or history, as they know most teams will have the facts / history stuff in their binders.
4. It encourages teams to collect more information in advance of the event, which is somewhat correlated to actually studying and preparing for the event versus going in to it 'cold turkey'.
5. It mimics what happens in the real world, in that if a scientist or engineer is presented with a question they don't know the answer to, they'll try to use various resources to determine the answer instead of just guessing or skipping it altogether.
As a side note, we've been trying to put language in the rules limiting the scope of history / trivia type questions. I personally enjoy including them and think they are within the reasonable scope of knowledge of science and engineering, but I tend to be in the minority on the committee with regards to this.
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
-
- Member
- Posts: 637
- Joined: April 26th, 2018, 6:40 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 110 times
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Except that the trivia questions are almost always pointless. Who cares what Sadi Carnot's full name was, or what liquid Newton used in his thermometer? The problem with history questions in an open book test is that they tend to be either something everyone has in their notes, or some irrelevant trivial detail. (It doesn't matter in precisely which year Carnot wrote Reflections.)chalker wrote: As a side note, we've been trying to put language in the rules limiting the scope of history / trivia type questions. I personally enjoy including them and think they are within the reasonable scope of knowledge of science and engineering, but I tend to be in the minority on the committee with regards to this.
I like open book tests. I agree that a good open book test (where you have to understand the ideas rather than just look up the equation with the right symbols) is an ideal test. But open book trivia? What does that test?
- TheChiScientist
- Member
- Posts: 732
- Joined: March 11th, 2018, 11:25 am
- Division: Grad
- State: IL
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Information that can get 1st place at ISO state. That is classified. (Mainly reference and 1/2 inch of history)UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:What do you put in five inches besides historyTheChiScientist wrote:Oof. That would be bad for us as we literally have a 5-inch thermo binder...
Wow. Talk about easy trivia. I have seen history questions be a bit more... Profound.knightmoves wrote:Except that the trivia questions are almost always pointless. Who cares what Sadi Carnot's full name was, or what liquid Newton used in his thermometer? The problem with history questions in an open book test is that they tend to be either something everyone has in their notes, or some irrelevant trivial detail. (It doesn't matter in precisely which year Carnot wrote Reflections.)chalker wrote: As a side note, we've been trying to put language in the rules limiting the scope of history / trivia type questions. I personally enjoy including them and think they are within the reasonable scope of knowledge of science and engineering, but I tend to be in the minority on the committee with regards to this.
I like open book tests. I agree that a good open book test (where you have to understand the ideas rather than just look up the equation with the right symbols) is an ideal test. But open book trivia? What does that test?
Open book tests can give everyone the same advantage yet people that have a more profound understanding will be able to finish these tests faster and more accurately.
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me
-
- Member
- Posts: 2107
- Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
That's a pretty narrow view of the value of knowledge and the pursuit of science. While you personally might not have interest, that doesn't mean there aren't people who find that stuff more interesting than saying solving something like a black body radiation problem. I'm sure there are things you find fascinating related to Science Olympiad events that others find pointless or boring. For example, someone might say whats the point of building a 'toy' roller coaster that uses a marble? Obviously the answer is that it simulates bigger dynamic systems and would be of interest to potential future mechanical and civil engineers. The same could be said for what you called pointless trivia questions and future archeologists or data scientists.knightmoves wrote:[
Except that the trivia questions are almost always pointless. Who cares what Sadi Carnot's full name was, or what liquid Newton used in his thermometer? ?
Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair
- windu34
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Chalker is very right about this. A good friend of mine (and my past EV/Remote partner) always enjoyed the "history" slides that our physics teacher incorporated in her lectures more so than learning to actually solve the problems. He will be attending Harvard 2022 with the intent of studying something along the lines of "History of Science"chalker wrote:That's a pretty narrow view of the value of knowledge and the pursuit of science. While you personally might not have interest, that doesn't mean there aren't people who find that stuff more interesting than saying solving something like a black body radiation problem. I'm sure there are things you find fascinating related to Science Olympiad events that others find pointless or boring. For example, someone might say whats the point of building a 'toy' roller coaster that uses a marble? Obviously the answer is that it simulates bigger dynamic systems and would be of interest to potential future mechanical and civil engineers. The same could be said for what you called pointless trivia questions and future archeologists or data scientists.knightmoves wrote:[
Except that the trivia questions are almost always pointless. Who cares what Sadi Carnot's full name was, or what liquid Newton used in his thermometer?
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
-
- Member
- Posts: 108
- Joined: September 29th, 2016, 5:12 pm
- Division: B
- State: NJ
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Do you think that they will change the allowed materials greatly?TheChiScientist wrote:chalker wrote:Yes;)TheChiScientist wrote:Do you guys think that there will be a rule change for thermo next year that is major?
I wonder if that means the build portion...
What did the thermometer say to the graduated cylinder?
"You may have graduated, but I have many degrees"
"You may have graduated, but I have many degrees"
- CookiePie1
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 428
- Joined: February 15th, 2018, 5:05 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
I'm not sure if they will allow aerogel next year. Otherwise, probably not.arv101 wrote:Do you think that they will change the allowed materials greatly?TheChiScientist wrote:chalker wrote:
Yes;)
I wonder if that means the build portion...
However, they might go back to the no foam thing from a few years back.
South Brunswick High School Captain '22
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
-
- Member
- Posts: 210
- Joined: June 3rd, 2018, 5:32 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Thermodynamics B/C
Was aerogel good this year? I talked to a bunch of the teams and from their experience aerogel was really bad at containing heat in the waterCookiePie1 wrote:I'm not sure if they will allow aerogel next year. Otherwise, probably not.arv101 wrote:Do you think that they will change the allowed materials greatly?TheChiScientist wrote:
I wonder if that means the build portion...
However, they might go back to the no foam thing from a few years back.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests