UGA's test was definitely outside the rules, in direct contradiction to 3.d (not to mention other problems...). I have not seen Johns Creek's test yet, so I cannot comment on that.I've only been gathering content for what the list gives (family/genus), but at the last two invitationals, they had mostly questions on specific species....
Is the event supervisor not interpreting the event description correctly or should I study all the species too? (there can be up to 50 in one genus)
At Johns Creek, they asked for the species common name (not genus/family common name) and I think species name was a tiebreaker.UGA's test was definitely outside the rules, in direct contradiction to 3.d (not to mention other problems...). I have not seen Johns Creek's test yet, so I cannot comment on that.I've only been gathering content for what the list gives (family/genus), but at the last two invitationals, they had mostly questions on specific species....
Is the event supervisor not interpreting the event description correctly or should I study all the species too? (there can be up to 50 in one genus)
If your state or regional has a list, the test at that tournament (or regionals as well in the case of a state list) should only cover what is on that list, and typically may not cover anything that's on the national list but not on the appropriate state/regional list.Just for clarification, the herpetology tests are supposed to cover organisms that are on the Official National List as well as the modified State/Regional list?
...uhh...count... brown...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest