MIT Invitational 2018

Area to advertise for your competitions!
arqto
Member
Member
Posts: 4
Joined: November 25th, 2017, 4:22 pm
Division: C
State: TX

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby arqto » January 22nd, 2018, 1:10 pm

What was a Fermi medal score
3rd with 129 points.
Clements High School '20
Cyfalls/MIT/Regionals/State
Chem Lab: 11/3/-/-
Dyplan: 1/1/2/2
Fossils: 4/3/1/2
Geomapping: 1/5/1/2
Codebusters: -/-/1/2

quantumk19
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: January 7th, 2018, 8:09 pm
State: -

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby quantumk19 » January 22nd, 2018, 1:34 pm

How many questions was the fermi test total?

User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4105
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Location: somewhere in the sciolyverse

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby Unome » January 22nd, 2018, 1:41 pm

How many questions was the fermi test total?
40
Userpage
Chattahoochee High School Class of 2018
Georgia Tech Class of 2022

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

EleGiggle
Member
Member
Posts: 6
Joined: March 11th, 2017, 7:58 am
Division: C
State: OH

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby EleGiggle » January 22nd, 2018, 1:44 pm

Wait, does anyone have raw scores for events right now?
MASON HIGH SCHOOL '23

ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 588
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Location: Solon, OH

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby ScottMaurer19 » January 22nd, 2018, 1:46 pm

Wait, does anyone have raw scores for events right now?
MIT does not release raw scores. People are just posting the points they received on their tests (which they do get back).

Anyone in rocks want to post (Harriton and Mason in particular)?
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80

kenniky
Member
Member
Posts: 283
Joined: January 21st, 2016, 6:16 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA
Location: ABRHS --> UMichigan

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby kenniky » January 22nd, 2018, 2:06 pm

I thought Optics was run really well because the kid running the laser shoot was really good at it

:^)

[In all seriousness the laser shoot this year was a significant step up in quality from last year]
Automated Event Assigner!
UMich 2018: Chem Lab, Fermi

[url=http://tinyurl.com/kenniky-so-test]Rate my tests![/url]
[url]https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/User:Kenniky[/url]

[url=https://scioly.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10008&start=34]2017 Nats = rip[/url]
[url=https://youtu.be/MCo8IAovjfw]ABRHS 2016[/url]

varunscs11
Member
Member
Posts: 163
Joined: March 14th, 2015, 9:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: PA

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby varunscs11 » January 22nd, 2018, 2:17 pm

Wait, does anyone have raw scores for events right now?
MIT does not release raw scores. People are just posting the points they received on their tests (which they do get back).

Anyone in rocks want to post (Harriton and Mason in particular)?
What did you think of the rocks exam (I know I asked on the day of the competition)

PS: I made a huge doc with all the score breakdowns and it should hopefully come with the exam when MIT sends those out.
Liberal Arts and Science Academy 2015-2017
University of Pennsylvania 2021
MIT Rocks and Minerals 2018, Fossils 2019

varunscs11's Userpage

User avatar
Adi1008
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 473
Joined: December 6th, 2013, 1:56 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby Adi1008 » January 22nd, 2018, 2:19 pm

This was my last time at MIT (unless I'm lucky enough to be able to help out next year) and it was possibly the best run for my events. Thank you to Science Olympiad at MIT for hosting another solid tournament and congratulations to Troy for an awe-inspiring, completely dominant performance.

Astronomy (1): Astronomy is my favorite event and this was one of my favorite tests; I especially liked the question about the energy budget of a type II supernova. However, I felt like the test was much too short and easy for something of MIT's caliber. My partner and I finished with ~25 minutes left and much of the test felt like mindlessly regurgitating facts on DSOs or plugging a few numbers into a some equations without a lot of critical thinking. Some of the questions briefly touched on some cool concepts (like the energy budget question and the URCA process question) but failed to really go in any depth or require some real analysis. Based on the few raw scores I know, it appears like numerous teams finished with >80-90% of the total points. The test was a joy to take and extremely high quality (as anything Donna and Tad do), but after hearing about the 37 (?) page Chemistry Lab test, the 700+ point Rocks and Minerals test, the crazy-hard DP test, or even looking back at the 2016 MIT Astronomy test, I can't help but wish this test was longer and more difficult.

WIDI (1): This structure was incredibly difficult for me and my partner. My partner has ~5 years of WIDI experience and didn't finish writing the entire structure and I didn't even finish building everything he wrote. I think the proctor's use of clay and the popsicle sticks was especially creative and although I perfectly understood everything my partner said, just building it was difficult because of how cramped the central cylinder and how fragile the popsicle stick base was for me. But that's what makes a WIDI structure good; in some places, it has to have stuff that's easy to write but hard to build, and in others, stuff that's hard to write but easy to build.

Hovercraft (2): The test was solid, as anything written by blakinator8 is. I felt like the test had a good mix of concepts and calculations and also a good spread in the difficulty/type of the questions. The build portion of the event was also run well, although I think having more volunteers could help in going faster. The only problem I'd have is with the impound process: it's incredibly time-consuming and tedious. I had two events in the first time slot (WIDI and Picture This) and ended up leaving my device in line and coming back to impound before going to WIDI (where I arrived right before the doers started, thankfully) and ended up waiting nearly an hour in line when it was all done. I'm not sure if there's anything that can be done about this aside from having more stations to check in devices with. Having another team member impound the device is a possibility, but often the ES asks questions about the construction of the device or asks the person impounding to turn the device on, which might be better done by the people who actually built the device. Hovercraft impound was like this last year at MIT and Golden Gate too.

Picture This (4): The proctors were incredibly nice in letting us go a bit early and being flexible due to my mess with Hovercraft impound/WIDI conflict. The words were nice and made sense and the event was run essentially perfectly.

Optics (10): The test was great, although included some questions that were extremely similar to last year's test. I think the test could have been slightly longer and more difficult, but it was still extremely solid overall. I personally hate the idea of counting sigfigs so much (having proper significant figures was half of each question's value, assuming you got it correct), but such is life. The LSS was run spectacularly well. The entire setup was essentially perfect and I can't think of anything that could be improved there. If I hadn't choked during the laser shoot, perhaps I could have had another medal.

I won't comment that much on other events but this is what I've briefly heard:
-Game On was a mess from start to end in nearly every aspect imaginable. It's been discussed quite a bit in the Game On thread so I won't really say much here. However, I'm sure the proctors really do care about running it well and tried everything they could. Just a very unfortunate situation for everyone.
-DP was incredibly difficult and long and filled with cool quotes and pictures and stuff. Although I know next to nothing about DP, I'm really looking forward to seeing this test.
-Fermi was very good
-Chem Lab was very long and very difficult
-Rocks was god-tier and I wish every test was like that
University of Texas at Austin '22
Seven Lakes High School '18
Beckendorff Junior High '14

ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 588
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Location: Solon, OH

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby ScottMaurer19 » January 22nd, 2018, 2:35 pm

Wait, does anyone have raw scores for events right now?
MIT does not release raw scores. People are just posting the points they received on their tests (which they do get back).

Anyone in rocks want to post (Harriton and Mason in particular)?
What did you think of the rocks exam (I know I asked on the day of the competition)

PS: I made a huge doc with all the score breakdowns and it should hopefully come with the exam when MIT sends those out.
I liked the test (granted I did well on it so I'm a bit biased). My biggest struggle on the test was time, finding the specimen of the right letter (this isn't an issue that is easily fixed), and not having the standard context clues of questions due to the use of charts (also not really an issue with the test). The one station that offered points for providing the variety as well as the standard mineral I thought was creative and the specimens used and the questions asked were standard-difficult to ID and answer which is always nice to see. Questions such as the calculating the specific gravity are also ones I think should be used more often even if I don't get to answer them.

I have no comment on part A seeing as I handed that to my partner at the beginning of the test and pretty much only did stations for the entire time.

Overall a super high quality, fast-paced test that would have required at least 3 of me to finish. I look forward to taking the other 60% of the test when it is released :D
Any chance that pictures of the specimens will be accompanying the test when it is released?
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80

User avatar
daydreamer0023
Member
Member
Posts: 195
Joined: January 29th, 2015, 5:44 pm
Division: Grad
State: -
Location: I have no idea where I am, but I can tell you exactly how fast I'm going ;)

Re: MIT Invitational 2018

Postby daydreamer0023 » January 22nd, 2018, 2:52 pm


Speaking of the opening ceremony...the admissions guy who stalled by telling stories. That was fairly entertaining. XD
Not sure I agree with that- for obvious reasons. He actually left a very bad impression on some of our competitors and parents that were there. One joke about Florida last year was funny. Asking why Florida teams decided to come back this year pushed the line but still had some humor, but telling Florida teams "you did your best" (I can't remember if that is an exact quote but it's very close) crossed the line (in my opinion). Some would say that we should "toughen up" but there is always a limit when you are the singling out groups of students who also work exceptionally hard. Some would say "he was completely kidding" but not all students read humor the same way.
Yeah...when I said entertaining, I mostly was referring to the stories he told. I also thought it was a bit too much with Florida. Given that we came from farther away than a reasonable single day drive from MIT (not to mention terrible road conditions in our home area), it is a bit much to bash a state that came even further.
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie


Return to “2018 Invitationals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest