Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Area to advertise for your competitions!
pb5754[]
Member
Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:49 am
Division: C
State: NJ
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby pb5754[] » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:41 pm

Raven wrote:
Raven wrote:When I was stacking, I added up LASA's scores and got 185 points, but the scoresheet says 162? Anybody know why?

This is also happening for some other events. I just re-added the event placings and I'm getting different values than the final score in the results.

Yeah I got that as well...

Maybe the scores are added wrong?????
Also, if you download the csv file, WWP South's hovercraft placement seems to be missing.
Events:
2019?: GLM, Astro, Fossils, Glaciers
2018: Astro, Rocks, DP, Fermi
2017: Rocks, DP, RS
---
Assassinator #120

Synaptic_Cleft
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:03 am
Division: C
State: -
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby Synaptic_Cleft » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:41 pm

Yea rocks and minerals wasn’t counted towards team scores because some people ended up moving samples around :o

pb5754[]
Member
Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:49 am
Division: C
State: NJ
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby pb5754[] » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:43 pm

Synaptic_Cleft wrote:Yea rocks and minerals wasn’t counted towards team scores because some people ended up moving samples around :o
and why did the ESs allow that?? :?:
Last edited by pb5754[] on Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Events:
2019?: GLM, Astro, Fossils, Glaciers
2018: Astro, Rocks, DP, Fermi
2017: Rocks, DP, RS
---
Assassinator #120

User avatar
Raven
Member
Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:01 am
Division: C
State: PA
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby Raven » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:44 pm

pb5754[] wrote:
Synaptic_Cleft wrote:Yea rocks and minerals wasn’t counted towards team scores because some people ended up moving samples around :o
and why did the ESs allow that?? :?:

Okay, I made another sheet without the rocks scores, you can access it if you go to the bottom of the spreadsheet.
Medal Count: 19
Reg:7, State:4, National:2
Schools: Bala Cynwyd MS (2015-17), Hairy Town HS (2018-21)
2018 Events: Herp, Eco, Anat, Dynamic

Ravens are my spirit animal.

GoldenKnight1
Coach
Coach
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 12:02 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby GoldenKnight1 » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:44 pm

pb5754[] wrote:
Synaptic_Cleft wrote:Yea rocks and minerals wasn’t counted towards team scores because some people ended up moving samples around :o
and why did the ESs allow that?? :?:

They were told not to but managing 30 stations can be difficult. It would have been better if the samples them had a label on them.

pb5754[]
Member
Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:49 am
Division: C
State: NJ
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby pb5754[] » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:50 pm

Was LASA stacked???
Events:
2019?: GLM, Astro, Fossils, Glaciers
2018: Astro, Rocks, DP, Fermi
2017: Rocks, DP, RS
---
Assassinator #120

User avatar
Ashernoel
Member
Member
Posts: 327
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:31 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby Ashernoel » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:58 pm

Rocks wasn’t scored because someone on our B team told the supervisor that the rocks had been moved around within each station. The supervisors interpreted this as, “I have moved Rocks from station to station,” so then they slashed the ID portion from all tests (90/200 points or something) and tiered him to last place, in a study event, lol. Also the grading was weird because the score for our other team in the test packet was far from the score on ezra, even without ID.
NT 2019

Synaptic_Cleft
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:03 am
Division: C
State: -
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby Synaptic_Cleft » Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:00 pm

No, there were also rocks that ended up at the wrong station unfortunately. The labeling idea is a good one for future tournaments!

JT880
Member
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2017 2:16 pm
Division: C
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby JT880 » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:40 pm

Congratulations to LASA for completely dominating and to everyone else that competed at UPenn yesterday! I thought that I'd post a view of my event reviews here:

Hovercraft (21) - Pretty good test! Probably a bit easier than the MIT test but definitely up there in terms of difficulty. I do wish there were a couple more fluid dynamics questions on there but nonetheless I was pleased with the test quality. The track was pretty well-made; our device just wasn't working properly so that's why we screwed up. Overall an A-

Mousetrap Vehicle (5) - Nothing much to say here other than this event was easily the highlight of my day. I thought that this event was run very well and the proctors definitely knew what they were doing. Also, does anybody know how LASA did in this event? Overall an A+

Dynamic Planet (45) - Man, I did not think we did that bad on the test here. It was definitely a well-written test but I guess my teammate and I misunderstood part of the test while taking it (I'll have to look at the test myself when we have our next team meeting). I thought the conceptual questions were pretty good and that it thoroughly tested the topics listed out in the rules manual. Overall an A

Thermodynamics (39) - I thought this event was pretty mediocre in terms of how it was run. Both our team and our A team measured the temperature of the water to be a couple degrees off the initial temperature and the volumes were a little bit off. I'll cut them some slack though; this event and Hovercraft are probably the most difficult events to run properly, and it was definitely not as bad as it was at MIT. The test on the other hand was pretty hard and I wish that I had prepared more for it. Overall a B-
Washington D.C.

2018 Events
Hovercraft, Optics, Thermodynamics, Dynamic Planet, Mousetrap Vehicle

User avatar
Riptide
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2017 3:09 am
Division: C
State: TX
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby Riptide » Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:35 pm

Anyone know how many questions there were on the Fermi Test?
Seven Lakes Junior High '15
Seven Lakes High School '19

Events
2018: Game On/Helicopters/Forensics/Hovercraft/Fermi Questions
2019: Sounds of Music/Codebusters

Name
Member
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:41 am
Division: C
State: NY
Location: Syosset
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby Name » Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:35 pm

Riptide wrote:Anyone know how many questions there were on the Fermi Test?

40 questions
South Woods- 2016-17 Syosset 2018-21
Previous main events: Microbe, Invasive, Herpetology, Matsci, Fermi
Projected possible events: Fermi, Fossils, Water Quality, Code Busters, Astronomy?
https://scioly.org/wiki/index.php/Syosset_High_School

User avatar
EastStroudsburg13
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2654
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:32 pm
Division: Grad
State: MD
Location: At work trying to be a real adult
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby EastStroudsburg13 » Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:56 pm

So even though there seemed to be issues with Rocks scoring, I did want to see how including those results affected scores to an extent. So I present the final scores with the Rocks places counting for half!

1. LASA - 173.5
2. Columbia - 233.5
3. Harriton B - 236.5
4. New Trier A - 242
5. Ward Melville A - 248
6. Harriton A - 250
7. WWP North A - 267
8. WWP North B - 269
9. Rustin - 329
10. Fairfax - 337.5
11. Conestoga A - 360.5
12. Penncrest - 388
13. Montgomery B - 389
14. South Brunswick A - 431
15. Shady Side A - 438.5
16. JP Stevens - 442
17. Princeton A - 461.5
18. Lower Merion - 464.5
18. WWP South B - 464.5*
20. WWP South A - 475.5
21. Montgomery A - 485.5
22. Syosset A - 505
23. Langley A - 531.5
24. Lower Merion B - 543.5
25. North Penn - 552
26. Chaminade A - 575.5
27. Conestoga B - 581
28. South Brunswick - 602.5
29. North Pocono A - 617
30. Parkland - 652
31. John Jay A - 657.5
32. JP Stevens - 660
33. East Brunswick - 662
34. New Trier B - 701.5
35. Cherry Hill East A - 719
36. Ward Melville B - 719.5
36. Garnet Valley - 719.5
38. Merrimack A - 743.5
39. North Pocono B - 780
40. Princeton B - 786.5
41. Langley B - 813.5
42. Whitehall - 818.5
43. Shipley - 829.5
44. John Jay B - 829.5
45. Masterman - 858
46. Cherry Hill East B - 932
47. Chaminade B - 952
48. Sun Valley - 961
49. Merrimack B - 1002.5
50. Syosset B - 1147.5
East Stroudsburg South Class of 2012, Alumnus of JT Lambert, Drexel University Class of 2017

Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki


If you have any questions for me, always feel free to shoot me a PM.

User avatar
c0c05w311y
Member
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:56 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby c0c05w311y » Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:31 pm

Overall, a great competition! I'll provide some feedback on the events.

Astronomy: Really good test in my opinion. The questions were interesting. It wasn't too short or too long (although there's almost no such thing as too long in this kind of event).

Hovercraft: It was run well and the test was good. It was a little different from most tests I see in that it had a fair amount of word answers rather than just math questions. It didn't have any really big/difficult physics problems which I usually enjoy; it seemed to focus more on having a wide range of knowledge. The supervisors were efficient and organized when I was there, which is really important.

Rocks and Minerals: A bit of a mess tbh. Besides the fact that things were apparently moved around, which has been discussed, it was very cramped and there was so little time to do so many questions (plus the event started late and had to run over time). This test was really about efficiency since it was so hard and long. I think maybe having fewer questions so teams have more time to think about answers or look through the binder is better, but there's nothing unfair about having a really long test. Unfortunately my team concentrated on getting the identification based questions right, which is the part discarded for scoring. Lastly, I generally prefer when the short answer questions provided are related to the samples at that station, but it works either way.

Chem Lab: I don't normally do chem lab but it seemed like a really good test. My only suggestion is to provide a greater proportion of points for the lab. The lab took a fairly long time but wasn't worth very much it seemed.

DarthBuilder
Member
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:02 pm
Division: C
State: IL
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby DarthBuilder » Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:25 pm

JT880 wrote:Congratulations to LASA for completely dominating and to everyone else that competed at UPenn yesterday! I thought that I'd post a view of my event reviews here:

Hovercraft (21) - Pretty good test! Probably a bit easier than the MIT test but definitely up there in terms of difficulty. I do wish there were a couple more fluid dynamics questions on there but nonetheless I was pleased with the test quality. The track was pretty well-made; our device just wasn't working properly so that's why we screwed up. Overall an A-

Mousetrap Vehicle (5) - Nothing much to say here other than this event was easily the highlight of my day. I thought that this event was run very well and the proctors definitely knew what they were doing. Also, does anybody know how LASA did in this event? Overall an A+

Dynamic Planet (45) - Man, I did not think we did that bad on the test here. It was definitely a well-written test but I guess my teammate and I misunderstood part of the test while taking it (I'll have to look at the test myself when we have our next team meeting). I thought the conceptual questions were pretty good and that it thoroughly tested the topics listed out in the rules manual. Overall an A

Thermodynamics (39) - I thought this event was pretty mediocre in terms of how it was run. Both our team and our A team measured the temperature of the water to be a couple degrees off the initial temperature and the volumes were a little bit off. I'll cut them some slack though; this event and Hovercraft are probably the most difficult events to run properly, and it was definitely not as bad as it was at MIT. The test on the other hand was pretty hard and I wish that I had prepared more for it. Overall a B-




I am not sure if I am allowed to post this but there first run was 0.8 cm off (It was said loud enough for the spectators to here) and their time was pretty good too.
New Trier 19’

Jibriel Saqibuddin
Regionals/State/nats 2017-2018

Towers:4/5/12
MTV:9/5/51;(

User avatar
antoine_ego
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 306
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 12:37 am
Division: C
State: MA
Location: Acton Boxborough Regional High School
Contact:

Re: Science Olympiad at UPenn 2018 Invitational

Postby antoine_ego » Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:21 pm

DarthBuilder wrote:
JT880 wrote:Congratulations to LASA for completely dominating and to everyone else that competed at UPenn yesterday! I thought that I'd post a view of my event reviews here:

Hovercraft (21) - Pretty good test! Probably a bit easier than the MIT test but definitely up there in terms of difficulty. I do wish there were a couple more fluid dynamics questions on there but nonetheless I was pleased with the test quality. The track was pretty well-made; our device just wasn't working properly so that's why we screwed up. Overall an A-

Mousetrap Vehicle (5) - Nothing much to say here other than this event was easily the highlight of my day. I thought that this event was run very well and the proctors definitely knew what they were doing. Also, does anybody know how LASA did in this event? Overall an A+

Dynamic Planet (45) - Man, I did not think we did that bad on the test here. It was definitely a well-written test but I guess my teammate and I misunderstood part of the test while taking it (I'll have to look at the test myself when we have our next team meeting). I thought the conceptual questions were pretty good and that it thoroughly tested the topics listed out in the rules manual. Overall an A

Thermodynamics (39) - I thought this event was pretty mediocre in terms of how it was run. Both our team and our A team measured the temperature of the water to be a couple degrees off the initial temperature and the volumes were a little bit off. I'll cut them some slack though; this event and Hovercraft are probably the most difficult events to run properly, and it was definitely not as bad as it was at MIT. The test on the other hand was pretty hard and I wish that I had prepared more for it. Overall a B-




I am not sure if I am allowed to post this but there first run was 0.8 cm off (It was said loud enough for the spectators to here) and their time was pretty good too.


Checking Ezra says that their score was 14.72.
Rest in Peace Len Joeris

National Placings
2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd
2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th
2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th
2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place!

Acton-Boxborough Regional High School '19


Return to “Invitationals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest