antoine_ego wrote:Will tests be released publicly?
That’s the plan. Not a guarantee that we’ll always do it but I’m pretty sure we will this year.
antoine_ego wrote:Will tests be released publicly?
MIScioly1 wrote:antoine_ego wrote:Will tests be released publicly?
That’s the plan. Not a guarantee that we’ll always do it but I’m pretty sure we will this year.
MIScioly1 wrote:Regarding the competition itself, we hope everyone had fun yesterday - I know those of us running it did!
syo_astro wrote:With all that said, I never want to help run a tourny ever again T_T.
syo_astro wrote:MIScioly1 wrote:antoine_ego wrote:Will tests be released publicly?
That’s the plan. Not a guarantee that we’ll always do it but I’m pretty sure we will this year.
Expanding on this:
I was the one who compiled tests and asked writers this year. Our group tried to edit them, but there were still kinks that needed working out (I know I had to modify my key for consistency...but I tried hard to be consistent >.>). I would say I meant most tests to be regionals level...but multiple were definitely harder. Looking at the scores, the difficulty range wasn't all that bad (but it's a range, so some were better, some were worse). I'm going to ask all the ES's for key updates, then we'll post them in a few places (hopefully both here and our website). Not everyone is a fan...but I am pretty ready for that (as I was questioned yesterday).
I also don't believe we're releasing scores, but some may be okay with releasing distributions / graphs without numbers (I believe this has been done before). Also, a review poll is going out Monday (ish?), so I'm curious what teams think. Of course, I'm curious who on the forums went...
With all that said, I never want to help run a tourny ever again T_T.
John Richardsim wrote:MIScioly1 wrote:Regarding the competition itself, we hope everyone had fun yesterday - I know those of us running it did!syo_astro wrote:With all that said, I never want to help run a tourny ever again T_T.
syo_astro wrote:With all that said, I never want to help run a tourny ever again T_T.
syo_astro wrote:With all that said, I never want to help run a tourny ever again T_T.
kenniky wrote:waking up at 5:15 is not for me
syo_astro wrote:With all that said, I never want to help run a tourny ever again T_T.
Chameleon02 wrote:I competed at UMich, took a few medals home, and our team won a trophy so good experience for us. If you guys are releasing scores, I was interested though in hearing what the RAW scores were for towers. All in all I had a great time (except when I sprinted .75 miles to the East building and almost slipped in ice) and definitely plan on coming back next year
MIScioly1 wrote:Chameleon02 wrote:I competed at UMich, took a few medals home, and our team won a trophy so good experience for us. If you guys are releasing scores, I was interested though in hearing what the RAW scores were for towers. All in all I had a great time (except when I sprinted .75 miles to the East building and almost slipped in ice) and definitely plan on coming back next year
Glad you had fun! I’m compiling frequency distributions and making histograms right now, they will be released tonight or tomorrow hopefully. We opted not to release the pure raw scores to protect team anonymity but these will give you a very good idea of where you stand.
dcambrid wrote:MIScioly1 wrote:Chameleon02 wrote:I competed at UMich, took a few medals home, and our team won a trophy so good experience for us. If you guys are releasing scores, I was interested though in hearing what the RAW scores were for towers. All in all I had a great time (except when I sprinted .75 miles to the East building and almost slipped in ice) and definitely plan on coming back next year
Glad you had fun! I’m compiling frequency distributions and making histograms right now, they will be released tonight or tomorrow hopefully. We opted not to release the pure raw scores to protect team anonymity but these will give you a very good idea of where you stand.
This is an invitational, raw scores are generally released at the least the ones our team has gone to. Isn't that a known coming in? If you want anonymity, don't go to invitationals.
antoine_ego wrote:dcambrid wrote:MIScioly1 wrote:Glad you had fun! I’m compiling frequency distributions and making histograms right now, they will be released tonight or tomorrow hopefully. We opted not to release the pure raw scores to protect team anonymity but these will give you a very good idea of where you stand.
This is an invitational, raw scores are generally released at the least the ones our team has gone to. Isn't that a known coming in? If you want anonymity, don't go to invitationals.
Raw scores are rarely released for many invitationals. At most you know your own score from the test packets they usually give you at the end of the day.
Unome wrote:antoine_ego wrote:dcambrid wrote:
This is an invitational, raw scores are generally released at the least the ones our team has gone to. Isn't that a known coming in? If you want anonymity, don't go to invitationals.
Raw scores are rarely released for many invitationals. At most you know your own score from the test packets they usually give you at the end of the day.
It varies by local culture. Here in Georgia, not releasing raw scores is the exception.
Return to “2018 Invitationals”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest