Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Area to advertise for your competitions!
mnoga
Member
Member
Posts: 81
Joined: March 19th, 2015, 6:12 pm
Division: C
State: CA

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby mnoga » January 28th, 2018, 11:58 am

1. Troy A (108)
2. Troy B (127)
3. Albany White (195)
4. Mountain View (258)
5. Camas (265)
6. Bayard Rustin (288)
7. Palo Alto Green (292)
8. Clark Black (299)
9. Brookwood A (340)
10. Monta Vista Purple (353)

I honestly had never heard of Albany before today, but they seem to have been on anupward swing at NorCal States recently, going from 13th to 5th, and now this. Camas and Clark are also especially strong this year (though we definitely knew the latter after their MIT results).
Im a little shocked at the excessively low Mira Loma scores. Even unstacked, I would have expected them to be contending with Troy for top places in each event, but it doesnt look to be the case.
But if you look at Mira Loma's composite score between both teams, I think you'll find that they are still (probably) better than any other NorCal team. I would agree that the gap appears to be closer between Mira Loma and teams like Albany, Mountain View and Palo Alto.

Rêveur
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 10:45 pm
State: -

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby Rêveur » January 28th, 2018, 1:01 pm

1. Troy A (108)
2. Troy B (127)
3. Albany White (195)
4. Mountain View (258)
5. Camas (265)
6. Bayard Rustin (288)
7. Palo Alto Green (292)
8. Clark Black (299)
9. Brookwood A (340)
10. Monta Vista Purple (353)

I honestly had never heard of Albany before today, but they seem to have been on anupward swing at NorCal States recently, going from 13th to 5th, and now this. Camas and Clark are also especially strong this year (though we definitely knew the latter after their MIT results).
Im a little shocked at the excessively low Mira Loma scores. Even unstacked, I would have expected them to be contending with Troy for top places in each event, but it doesnt look to be the case.
But if you look at Mira Loma's composite score between both teams, I think you'll find that they are still (probably) better than any other NorCal team. I would agree that the gap appears to be closer between Mira Loma and teams like Albany, Mountain View and Palo Alto.
What do you guys think happened with Mira Loma? I remember they had 3 teams at the ML tournament on the 6th of January. Are they hiding their talent / best builds?

User avatar
Kyanite
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: November 6th, 2017, 8:43 am
Division: Grad
State: WA
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby Kyanite » January 28th, 2018, 1:38 pm

Im a little shocked at the excessively low Mira Loma scores. Even unstacked, I would have expected them to be contending with Troy for top places in each event, but it doesnt look to be the case.
But if you look at Mira Loma's composite score between both teams, I think you'll find that they are still (probably) better than any other NorCal team. I would agree that the gap appears to be closer between Mira Loma and teams like Albany, Mountain View and Palo Alto.
What do you guys think happened with Mira Loma? I remember they had 3 teams at the ML tournament on the 6th of January. Are they hiding their talent / best builds?
No idea, I would find that to be an odd strategy as it would have you miss valuable time to test your builds, notes or partnerships. I have heard from some Mira Loma competitors that they lost a lot of key seniors last year, maybe they will have low year this year and then next year they will be competitive again.

connerywood18
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: July 14th, 2015, 2:10 pm
Division: C
State: CA

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby connerywood18 » February 2nd, 2018, 7:57 pm


But if you look at Mira Loma's composite score between both teams, I think you'll find that they are still (probably) better than any other NorCal team. I would agree that the gap appears to be closer between Mira Loma and teams like Albany, Mountain View and Palo Alto.
What do you guys think happened with Mira Loma? I remember they had 3 teams at the ML tournament on the 6th of January. Are they hiding their talent / best builds?
No idea, I would find that to be an odd strategy as it would have you miss valuable time to test your builds, notes or partnerships. I have heard from some Mira Loma competitors that they lost a lot of key seniors last year, maybe they will have low year this year and then next year they will be competitive again.
And you can bet all of the other three teams will be racing for the nationals spot while Mira Loma is down.

User avatar
Kyanite
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: November 6th, 2017, 8:43 am
Division: Grad
State: WA
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby Kyanite » February 2nd, 2018, 9:03 pm


What do you guys think happened with Mira Loma? I remember they had 3 teams at the ML tournament on the 6th of January. Are they hiding their talent / best builds?
No idea, I would find that to be an odd strategy as it would have you miss valuable time to test your builds, notes or partnerships. I have heard from some Mira Loma competitors that they lost a lot of key seniors last year, maybe they will have low year this year and then next year they will be competitive again.
And you can bet all of the other three teams will be racing for the nationals spot while Mira Loma is down.
thats very true
Last edited by Kyanite on February 3rd, 2018, 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tailsfan101
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 629
Joined: April 14th, 2017, 4:33 pm
Division: C
State: ID
Location: Philippians 3:20a "For our citizenship is in heaven"
Contact:

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby Tailsfan101 » February 3rd, 2018, 7:57 am

Very true
2. Posts should have a legitimate purpose. Users should not post two word replies, personal attacks, malicious rumors, or advertisement for a paid service.
;)
2020 Treasure Valley Homeschool Wiki (Division C)
2020 events: DD, GLM, DG, PM
Mini-Inv./DISCO/State/Nats
RS: 1/2/1/-
DD: -/3/2/-
HD: 2/4/4/-
CB: 3/6/1/-
ELG: -/6/-/-
GLM: -/-/-/31
WIDI: -/-/-/24
PTQ: -/-/-/41
Assassinator for games #118 and 136

User avatar
Kyanite
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: November 6th, 2017, 8:43 am
Division: Grad
State: WA
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby Kyanite » February 3rd, 2018, 3:51 pm

Very true
2. Posts should have a legitimate purpose. Users should not post two word replies, personal attacks, malicious rumors, or advertisement for a paid service.
;)
Got me again :lol:

User avatar
antoine_ego
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 385
Joined: May 24th, 2016, 5:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: MA

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby antoine_ego » February 5th, 2018, 1:45 pm

Is it true that Golden Gate has watermarked their tests?
Rest in Peace Len Joeris
[b]2016 Air Trajectory Nationals - 3rd
2018 Hovercraft Nationals - 6th
2018 Mousetrap Nationals - 6th
2018 Nationals - Team 9th Place!
2019 Astronomy Nationals - 3rd!
2019 Nationals - Team 9th Place!
[/b]
Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Captain 17-19

Raleway
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 228
Joined: March 12th, 2017, 7:19 pm
Division: C
State: -

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby Raleway » February 5th, 2018, 1:56 pm

Is it true that Golden Gate has watermarked their tests?
That's the word on the block sir
Sleep is for the week; one only needs it once a week :!: :geek: :roll: :?: :idea:

God bless Len Joeris | Balsaman

Rêveur
Member
Member
Posts: 47
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 10:45 pm
State: -

Re: Golden Gate Science Olympiad Invitational (C)

Postby Rêveur » February 5th, 2018, 5:14 pm

Is it true that Golden Gate has watermarked their tests?
That's the word on the block sir
Yeah Golden Gate did indeed watermark their tests


Return to “2018 Invitationals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest