Raw scores at nats predictions

DarthBuilder
Member
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: August 1st, 2017, 8:02 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by DarthBuilder »

What do you guys think top 6 raw scores at nats will be?
Deleted
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

1:~3:30
2-4: >3:10
5-6: >3:05

This may be a little high considering it's a racquetball court and teams tend to have issues running into walls
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
User avatar
daydreamer0023
Member
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: January 29th, 2015, 5:44 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by daydreamer0023 »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:1:~3:30
2-4: >3:10
5-6: >3:05

This may be a little high considering it's a racquetball court and teams tend to have issues running into walls
Is the 3:30 an estimate from Troy? I've heard they've got in that range.
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie

Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23

See resources I helped create here!
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

daydreamer0023 wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote:1:~3:30
2-4: >3:10
5-6: >3:05

This may be a little high considering it's a racquetball court and teams tend to have issues running into walls
Is the 3:30 an estimate from Troy? I've heard they've got in that range.
No that was mainly based off of some Michigan teams being that high. I may have underestimated the top times, but I know a few teams will have conservative flights--at least for their first flight--to avoid hitting a wall at the higher torques.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
sciencegirl03
Member
Member
Posts: 50
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 6:41 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by sciencegirl03 »

The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

2019 Nationals:
Wright Stuff: 3rd
Protein Modeling: 4th
Geologic Mapping: 5th
sciencegirl03
Member
Member
Posts: 50
Joined: December 26th, 2017, 6:41 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by sciencegirl03 »

Anyone getting over a 3:00 is doing great and has a chance to medal in my opinion :D
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

2019 Nationals:
Wright Stuff: 3rd
Protein Modeling: 4th
Geologic Mapping: 5th
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

sciencegirl03 wrote:The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
DarthBuilder
Member
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: August 1st, 2017, 8:02 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by DarthBuilder »

ScottMaurer19 wrote:
sciencegirl03 wrote:The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.
What was the raw time for the national winner last year?
Deleted
User avatar
daydreamer0023
Member
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: January 29th, 2015, 5:44 pm
Division: Grad
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by daydreamer0023 »

DarthBuilder wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote:
sciencegirl03 wrote:The Michigan teams with those high scores didn't make it to Nationals.
This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.
What was the raw time for the national winner last year?
It was around 2:20-2:30ish (can't remember exactly). However, that year didn't have a chinook bonus - and chinooks allow for a more stable copter if built correctly, in my opinion at least.
"I am among those who think that science has great beauty. A scientist in his laboratory is not only a technician: he is also a child placed before natural phenomena which impress him like a fairy tale." - Marie Curie

Enloe '19 || UNC Chapel Hill '23

See resources I helped create here!
ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 592
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Raw scores at nats predictions

Post by ScottMaurer19 »

daydreamer0023 wrote:
DarthBuilder wrote:
ScottMaurer19 wrote: This is true but it is an indicator that there are probably a handful of team who did make it to nats with times that high.
What was the raw time for the national winner last year?
It was around 2:20-2:30ish (can't remember exactly). However, that year didn't have a chinook bonus - and chinooks allow for a more stable copter if built correctly, in my opinion at least.
Larger rotors allow for longer times. Idk about stability but they are not as good about bouncing off of walls.
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80
Locked

Return to “Helicopters C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests