My dimension goals are sub 20x15x15PM2017 wrote:I feel like both the chemical clock and the size will be the determining factor at nats.Iwilsonp wrote:That's crazy small.ScottMaurer19 wrote: Haha nice. Impressive dimensions
Do people think size will be the differentiating factor between the top teams at Nationals?
please wish me luck in the upcoming months 
2017 (r/s/n): Hydro: 3/5/18 Robot Arm: na/1/1 Rocks: 1/1/1 2018 (r/s/n): Heli: 2/1/7 Herp: 1/4/4 Mission: 1/1/6 Rocks: 1/1/1 Eco: 6/3/9 2019 (r/s/n): Fossils: 1/1/1 GLM: 1/1/1 Herp: 1/1/5 Mission: 1/1/3 WS: 4/1/10 Top 3 Medals: 144 Golds: 80
Agreed on that, although I feel that scores will get scary close as the year progresses and as people get all 12 actions and a timer. This would then make size a bigger factor due to its tie breaking role.PM2017 wrote:I feel like both the chemical clock and the size will be the determining factor at nats.Iwilsonp wrote:That's crazy small.ScottMaurer19 wrote: Haha nice. Impressive dimensions
Do people think size will be the differentiating factor between the top teams at Nationals?
By timer, I meant precision (or rather, closer to 3 min), and not so much whether it's working or not.Kyanite wrote:Agreed on that, although I feel that scores will get scary close as the year progresses and as people get all 12 actions and a timer. This would then make size a bigger factor due to its tie breaking role.PM2017 wrote:I feel like both the chemical clock and the size will be the determining factor at nats.Iwilsonp wrote:
That's crazy small.
Do people think size will be the differentiating factor between the top teams at Nationals?
Hovercraft: Islip Invy 2[sup]nd[/sup], MIT Invy 26[sup]th[/sup], Regionals 3[sup]rd[/sup], SOUP 3[sup]rd[/sup], Statees 3[sup]rd[/sup] Mission Possible: Islip Invy 11[sup]th[/sup], MIT Invy 11[sup]th[/sup], Regionals 1[sup]st[/sup], SOUP 2[sup]nd[/sup], States 2[sup]nd[/sup] Game (Alternate): MIT Invy 32[sup]nd[/sup]
What do you estimate would be a competitive top ten score in NY? I have no clue what to aim for.davecutting wrote:Our device scored 1280 at UPenn, and Cornell's device was at 1332 or something like that. Had all of our actions worked we would have been at 1395+.
Anything above 1000-1100 probably...unknownuser2 wrote:What do you estimate would be a competitive top ten score in NY? I have no clue what to aim for.davecutting wrote:Our device scored 1280 at UPenn, and Cornell's device was at 1332 or something like that. Had all of our actions worked we would have been at 1395+.
Hovercraft: Islip Invy 2[sup]nd[/sup], MIT Invy 26[sup]th[/sup], Regionals 3[sup]rd[/sup], SOUP 3[sup]rd[/sup], Statees 3[sup]rd[/sup] Mission Possible: Islip Invy 11[sup]th[/sup], MIT Invy 11[sup]th[/sup], Regionals 1[sup]st[/sup], SOUP 2[sup]nd[/sup], States 2[sup]nd[/sup] Game (Alternate): MIT Invy 32[sup]nd[/sup]
davecutting wrote:Anything above 1000-1100 probably...unknownuser2 wrote:What do you estimate would be a competitive top ten score in NY? I have no clue what to aim for.davecutting wrote:Our device scored 1280 at UPenn, and Cornell's device was at 1332 or something like that. Had all of our actions worked we would have been at 1395+.
Probably 25*25*25 and underKyanite wrote:What do you all think will be a competitive size for nationals?
Hovercraft: Islip Invy 2[sup]nd[/sup], MIT Invy 26[sup]th[/sup], Regionals 3[sup]rd[/sup], SOUP 3[sup]rd[/sup], Statees 3[sup]rd[/sup] Mission Possible: Islip Invy 11[sup]th[/sup], MIT Invy 11[sup]th[/sup], Regionals 1[sup]st[/sup], SOUP 2[sup]nd[/sup], States 2[sup]nd[/sup] Game (Alternate): MIT Invy 32[sup]nd[/sup]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests
