ah alright that makes sense thanksdxu46 wrote:That's the condensed data table with important data such as averages.Anomaly wrote:What does the rubric mean in the quantitative data section where it says "Report most relevant data"?
Making a presentation on expd for middle schoolers and I come across that and have no idea what it means.
Experimental Design B/C
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 642
- Joined: February 17th, 2017, 10:46 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Experimental Design B/C
Orefield MS SO 2015-2018, Parkland HS SO 2019-2020
Medal/Ribbon Count
Invitational: 25
Regional: 16
State: 7
y o i n k s
Events: Anatomy and Physiology, Codebusters, Designer Genes, Protein Modeling
don't look at this its fake news now
Medal/Ribbon Count
Invitational: 25
Regional: 16
State: 7
y o i n k s
Events: Anatomy and Physiology, Codebusters, Designer Genes, Protein Modeling
don't look at this its fake news now
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 137
- Joined: September 4th, 2018, 7:47 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Experimental Design B/C
I think it means that you should report data that is relevant to the hypothesis.Anomaly wrote:What does the rubric mean in the quantitative data section where it says "Report most relevant data"?
Making a presentation on expd for middle schoolers and I come across that and have no idea what it means.
For example, if you're doing an XP with ball drop height v. drop time, you wouldn't report bounce height.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 137
- Joined: September 4th, 2018, 7:47 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Experimental Design B/C
I think it means that you shouldn't be doing mode or range for Division C.pal_420 wrote:What do the rules mean by age-appropriate statistic? Does this mean we can't have more complex stuff like ANOVA?
Who knows? You might want Pearson Correlation.
Also, how would ANOVA even apply to XPD data?
-
- Coach
- Posts: 422
- Joined: May 19th, 2017, 10:55 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Experimental Design B/C
Many proctors will be unfamiliar with ANOVA, so I would not recommend using it for your statistical analysis. It is certainly not necessary to do so.Jacobi wrote:I think it means that you shouldn't be doing mode or range for Division C.pal_420 wrote:What do the rules mean by age-appropriate statistic? Does this mean we can't have more complex stuff like ANOVA?
Who knows? You might want Pearson Correlation.
Also, how would ANOVA even apply to XPD data?
At the Division C level, I would generally recommend you choose either Pearson's correlation coefficient (r and r^2) or Student's t-test. These will cover almost every scenario and are easy to calculate using a graphing calculator. It is important that you understand and interpret the meaning of the results, rather than simply reporting them.
Mean and standard deviation will almost always be the best measures of center and spread to report. Occasionally, median might be preferred, but you're unlikely to have a sufficient sample size to know if your data is skewed.
Assistant Coach and Alumnus ('14) - Solon High School Science Olympiad
Tournament Director - Northeast Ohio Regional Tournament
Tournament Director - Solon High School Science Olympiad Invitational
Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
Tournament Director - Northeast Ohio Regional Tournament
Tournament Director - Solon High School Science Olympiad Invitational
Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.
- dxu46
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: April 11th, 2017, 6:55 pm
- Division: C
- State: MO
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Experimental Design B/C
What about for division B? A lot of the statistics would be much more simpler with an algorithm on a graphing calculator, but that's taken away.nicholasmaurer wrote:Many proctors will be unfamiliar with ANOVA, so I would not recommend using it for your statistical analysis. It is certainly not necessary to do so.Jacobi wrote:I think it means that you shouldn't be doing mode or range for Division C.pal_420 wrote:What do the rules mean by age-appropriate statistic? Does this mean we can't have more complex stuff like ANOVA?
Who knows? You might want Pearson Correlation.
Also, how would ANOVA even apply to XPD data?
At the Division C level, I would generally recommend you choose either Pearson's correlation coefficient (r and r^2) or Student's t-test. These will cover almost every scenario and are easy to calculate using a graphing calculator. It is important that you understand and interpret the meaning of the results, rather than simply reporting them.
Mean and standard deviation will almost always be the best measures of center and spread to report. Occasionally, median might be preferred, but you're unlikely to have a sufficient sample size to know if your data is skewed.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Experimental Design B/C
I would say mean and standard deviation are fairly easy to calculate by hand, but you could also use the mean absolute deviation which takes the absolute values instead of squaring and then square rooting (even easier by hand!).dxu46 wrote:What about for division B? A lot of the statistics would be much more simpler with an algorithm on a graphing calculator, but that's taken away.nicholasmaurer wrote:Many proctors will be unfamiliar with ANOVA, so I would not recommend using it for your statistical analysis. It is certainly not necessary to do so.Jacobi wrote: I think it means that you shouldn't be doing mode or range for Division C.
Who knows? You might want Pearson Correlation.
Also, how would ANOVA even apply to XPD data?
At the Division C level, I would generally recommend you choose either Pearson's correlation coefficient (r and r^2) or Student's t-test. These will cover almost every scenario and are easy to calculate using a graphing calculator. It is important that you understand and interpret the meaning of the results, rather than simply reporting them.
Mean and standard deviation will almost always be the best measures of center and spread to report. Occasionally, median might be preferred, but you're unlikely to have a sufficient sample size to know if your data is skewed.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 137
- Joined: September 4th, 2018, 7:47 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Experimental Design B/C
Given that they say "age-appropriate", they would expect mean, median, range, mode???? , maybe Standard Deviation. Those formulae are easy to memorize and execute on a 4-function or non-programmable scientific calculator.dxu46 wrote:What about for division B? A lot of the statistics would be much more simpler with an algorithm on a graphing calculator, but that's taken away.nicholasmaurer wrote:Many proctors will be unfamiliar with ANOVA, so I would not recommend using it for your statistical analysis. It is certainly not necessary to do so.Jacobi wrote: I think it means that you shouldn't be doing mode or range for Division C.
Who knows? You might want Pearson Correlation.
Also, how would ANOVA even apply to XPD data?
At the Division C level, I would generally recommend you choose either Pearson's correlation coefficient (r and r^2) or Student's t-test. These will cover almost every scenario and are easy to calculate using a graphing calculator. It is important that you understand and interpret the meaning of the results, rather than simply reporting them.
Mean and standard deviation will almost always be the best measures of center and spread to report. Occasionally, median might be preferred, but you're unlikely to have a sufficient sample size to know if your data is skewed.
- dxu46
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: April 11th, 2017, 6:55 pm
- Division: C
- State: MO
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Experimental Design B/C
Alright, thanks.UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:I would say mean and standard deviation are fairly easy to calculate by hand, but you could also use the mean absolute deviation which takes the absolute values instead of squaring and then square rooting (even easier by hand!).dxu46 wrote:What about for division B? A lot of the statistics would be much more simpler with an algorithm on a graphing calculator, but that's taken away.nicholasmaurer wrote:
Many proctors will be unfamiliar with ANOVA, so I would not recommend using it for your statistical analysis. It is certainly not necessary to do so.
At the Division C level, I would generally recommend you choose either Pearson's correlation coefficient (r and r^2) or Student's t-test. These will cover almost every scenario and are easy to calculate using a graphing calculator. It is important that you understand and interpret the meaning of the results, rather than simply reporting them.
Mean and standard deviation will almost always be the best measures of center and spread to report. Occasionally, median might be preferred, but you're unlikely to have a sufficient sample size to know if your data is skewed.
Just wondering, are there any ES's out there on the forums? I'm curious on how certain sections are judged (i.e. Analysis, Qualitative, Statistics)
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Experimental Design B/C
(Also see Jacobi's post, although I'm skeptical of range being a good indicator of anything, and you probably won't have a mode)dxu46 wrote:Alright, thanks.UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F wrote:I would say mean and standard deviation are fairly easy to calculate by hand, but you could also use the mean absolute deviation which takes the absolute values instead of squaring and then square rooting (even easier by hand!).dxu46 wrote: What about for division B? A lot of the statistics would be much more simpler with an algorithm on a graphing calculator, but that's taken away.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests