States

User avatar
invisiblebanana
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: February 21st, 2019, 3:24 pm
Division: B
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by invisiblebanana »

I totally had a 0 cm gap, 0 sec run time and was 0 cm away from the target ;)
"You can't see me"

InvisibleBanana's Userpage
User avatar
Tendan
Member
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: January 27th, 2019, 5:37 pm
Division: C
State: PA
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by Tendan »

invisiblebanana wrote:I totally had a 0 cm gap, 0 sec run time and was 0 cm away from the target ;)
Why not go for the universe breaking -1 cm gap?
2019 - 2020 Events
~ Boomilever
~ Detector Building
~ Gravity Vehicle
~ Machines
~ Ping-Pong Parachute
builder83
Member
Member
Posts: 178
Joined: September 7th, 2017, 4:41 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by builder83 »

invisiblebanana wrote:I totally had a 0 cm gap, 0 sec run time and was 0 cm away from the target ;)
Totally doable! Buggy glider flies over photogate with an on point landing!

Anyway at state my goal is under 3 sec, under 3 cm, under 25 cm gate. Can always get a tighter gate but doubt I will need it. Gota study thermo more anyway...
User avatar
invisiblebanana
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: February 21st, 2019, 3:24 pm
Division: B
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by invisiblebanana »

Tendan wrote:
invisiblebanana wrote:I totally had a 0 cm gap, 0 sec run time and was 0 cm away from the target ;)
Why not go for the universe breaking -1 cm gap?
Imagine if the rules counted the bonus distance as the distance chosen by the participant for the bonus and also had no bonus distance limit.

Then you could have a -99999....... gap

And get a -9999999999....... score

:?:
"You can't see me"

InvisibleBanana's Userpage
shrewdPanther46
Member
Member
Posts: 438
Joined: October 9th, 2017, 6:25 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by shrewdPanther46 »

sciolyperson1 wrote:
MattChina wrote:
MadCow2357 wrote: Hmm so do you think this is a troll or do you think they meant regionals.
They either have a godly buggy or they got reallly lucky. Idk, maybe its a troll
Its bs lol
1.9 seconds is faster than my run at nats (2.086, fastest run at nats last year)
while it is bs its probably possible even with dc motors
OhioRockstar
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: March 25th, 2019, 12:11 pm
Division: B
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by OhioRockstar »

sciolyperson1 wrote:
OhioRockstar wrote:We got 1st at States but it was close. We had a 12 cm gate. We had a time of 1.9 and got 0.3 cm from point. So thats a score of -46.5
Ohio states didn't happen yet.

Im from the future
User avatar
invisiblebanana
Member
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: February 21st, 2019, 3:24 pm
Division: B
State: MA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by invisiblebanana »

shrewdPanther46 wrote:
sciolyperson1 wrote:
MattChina wrote: They either have a godly buggy or they got reallly lucky. Idk, maybe its a troll
Its bs lol
1.9 seconds is faster than my run at nats (2.086, fastest run at nats last year)
while it is bs its probably possible even with dc motors
I mean, you can buy a 3000 rpm dc motor, and use an absurdly high gear ratio and make it have less than a 1 second speed.

Although most people don't do that since it lowers the accuracy by a lot.
"You can't see me"

InvisibleBanana's Userpage
shrewdPanther46
Member
Member
Posts: 438
Joined: October 9th, 2017, 6:25 pm
Division: C
State: NJ
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by shrewdPanther46 »

invisiblebanana wrote:
shrewdPanther46 wrote:
sciolyperson1 wrote:
Its bs lol
1.9 seconds is faster than my run at nats (2.086, fastest run at nats last year)
while it is bs its probably possible even with dc motors
I mean, you can buy a 3000 rpm dc motor, and use an absurdly high gear ratio and make it have less than a 1 second speed.

Although most people don't do that since it lowers the accuracy by a lot.
ever heard of torque?
OhioRockstar
Member
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: March 25th, 2019, 12:11 pm
Division: B
State: OH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: States

Post by OhioRockstar »

shrewdPanther46 wrote:
invisiblebanana wrote:
shrewdPanther46 wrote: while it is bs its probably possible even with dc motors
I mean, you can buy a 3000 rpm dc motor, and use an absurdly high gear ratio and make it have less than a 1 second speed.

Although most people don't do that since it lowers the accuracy by a lot.
ever heard of torque?
yeah, you probably would have to make the buggy super light, like literally balsa chasis
User avatar
windu34
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1384
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: States

Post by windu34 »

OhioRockstar wrote:
shrewdPanther46 wrote:
invisiblebanana wrote:
I mean, you can buy a 3000 rpm dc motor, and use an absurdly high gear ratio and make it have less than a 1 second speed.

Although most people don't do that since it lowers the accuracy by a lot.
ever heard of torque?
yeah, you probably would have to make the buggy super light, like literally balsa chasis
<1.9 s is definitely possible, and not necessarily at the loss of accuracy. The national EV champion in 2016 had 1.6 seconds with perfect accuracy and was not the fastest device at the tournament. Although they used brushless motors, I think 1.9 is possible with brushed. That said, I agree its unlikely.
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
Locked

Return to “Battery Buggy B”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests