PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Locked
User avatar
cheese
Member
Member
Posts: 211
Joined: April 8th, 2017, 7:59 pm
Division: C
Location: Wherever the cheese is
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by cheese » October 25th, 2018, 8:47 pm

Just a continuation and an organized way to see how other people have been doing so far. Feel free to post any scores you have gotten in practice or competition here.
2018 Nationals: 2nd Place Mystery Architecture || 6th Place Battery Buggy
Cheese's Userpage

Chameleon02
Member
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 1:54 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by Chameleon02 » November 16th, 2018, 2:06 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2N6Qr-oGAs
This is our first test on Boomilevers. The design was for Division B and scored about 600. As you can see the boomilever failed from compression. Please feel free to point out design flaws, etc. It was a disappointing score yet not terrible for our first boomilever. As we have had much prior experience with balsa events our wood selection was tedious and the boomilever came out under 9 grams.
Last&SeventhYearSciolyer
2020 Events: Boomilever, Wright Stuff, Protein, Chem lab, Gravvy
The Air Trajectory nostalgia hits hard

RishiVanga
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: November 18th, 2018, 5:15 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by RishiVanga » November 18th, 2018, 5:18 pm

Hey everyone! So I did towers last year and I realize that the average scores for Boomilever will likely be different. I was wondering if anyone knew what a good score is? I managed to place 4th in VA last year and I'm hoping to do as well again. I saw some old scores but the event parameters changed this year from previous ones.

User avatar
TheChiScientist
Member
Member
Posts: 730
Joined: March 11th, 2018, 11:25 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Contemplating yeeting myself off a cliff...
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by TheChiScientist » November 18th, 2018, 5:23 pm

RishiVanga wrote:Hey everyone! So I did towers last year and I realize that the average scores for Boomilever will likely be different. I was wondering if anyone knew what a good score is? I managed to place 4th in VA last year and I'm hoping to do as well again. I saw some old scores but the event parameters changed this year from previous ones.
If you want to have a chance of medaling at a competitive invitational you're gonna need a score of at least 1000. In a less competitive invitational, I'd say 800+ would be good.
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me

Sciencer101
Member
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: September 5th, 2018, 6:58 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by Sciencer101 » December 7th, 2018, 7:22 am

Chameleon02 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2N6Qr-oGAs
This is our first test on Boomilevers. The design was for Division B and scored about 600. As you can see the boomilever failed from compression. Please feel free to point out design flaws, etc. It was a disappointing score yet not terrible for our first boomilever. As we have had much prior experience with balsa events our wood selection was tedious and the boomilever came out under 9 grams.
My first thought is that your boom is too heavy, and this is probably what brought you down so low.
Instead of trying to get your boom to hold more, try making it lighter.

User avatar
MadCow2357
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 766
Joined: November 19th, 2017, 9:09 am
Division: C
State: RI
Location: Stark Industries Internship
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 52 times
Contact:

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by MadCow2357 » December 7th, 2018, 7:35 am

Sciencer101 wrote:
Chameleon02 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2N6Qr-oGAs
This is our first test on Boomilevers. The design was for Division B and scored about 600. As you can see the boomilever failed from compression. Please feel free to point out design flaws, etc. It was a disappointing score yet not terrible for our first boomilever. As we have had much prior experience with balsa events our wood selection was tedious and the boomilever came out under 9 grams.
My first thought is that your boom is too heavy, and this is probably what brought you down so low.
Instead of trying to get your boom to hold more, try making it lighter.
I must disagree with Sciencer. The problem with your boom was the buckling of the compression part. I would try thickening the main compression beams. I believe that the load score increase would greatly outweigh the boomilever's weight increase. To go lighter, I think, would not be a good thing at this stage in the season. Try to get at least a load of 10kg first, and then start shaving off weight.

What sizes are your compression members?
MadCow2357's Userpage
2020 Events: Boomilever, Machines, Wright Stuff, and sadly not Gravity Vehicle
Gallagher MS '19
Barrington HS '23
Andrew Yang for VP!
In remembrance of Len Joeris (Balsa Man) and Dr. Gerard Putz - Don't cry because they are gone. Smile because they were here.

DarthBuilder
Member
Member
Posts: 288
Joined: August 1st, 2017, 8:02 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by DarthBuilder » December 7th, 2018, 8:28 am

MadCow2357 wrote:
Sciencer101 wrote:
Chameleon02 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2N6Qr-oGAs
This is our first test on Boomilevers. The design was for Division B and scored about 600. As you can see the boomilever failed from compression. Please feel free to point out design flaws, etc. It was a disappointing score yet not terrible for our first boomilever. As we have had much prior experience with balsa events our wood selection was tedious and the boomilever came out under 9 grams.
My first thought is that your boom is too heavy, and this is probably what brought you down so low.
Instead of trying to get your boom to hold more, try making it lighter.
I must disagree with Sciencer. The problem with your boom was the buckling of the compression part. I would try thickening the main compression beams. I believe that the load score increase would greatly outweigh the boomilever's weight increase. To go lighter, I think, would not be a good thing at this stage in the season. Try to get at least a load of 10kg first, and then start shaving off weight.

What sizes are your compression members?
I second this. Make your boomilever heavier and try to hold most of the sand. Once it holds a good amount strat cutting down the weight of your boomilever.
Deleted

User avatar
TheChiScientist
Member
Member
Posts: 730
Joined: March 11th, 2018, 11:25 am
Division: Grad
State: IL
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Location: Contemplating yeeting myself off a cliff...
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by TheChiScientist » December 7th, 2018, 6:33 pm

DarthBuilder wrote:
MadCow2357 wrote:
Sciencer101 wrote:
My first thought is that your boom is too heavy, and this is probably what brought you down so low.
Instead of trying to get your boom to hold more, try making it lighter.
I must disagree with Sciencer. The problem with your boom was the buckling of the compression part. I would try thickening the main compression beams. I believe that the load score increase would greatly outweigh the boomilever's weight increase. To go lighter, I think, would not be a good thing at this stage in the season. Try to get at least a load of 10kg first, and then start shaving off weight.

What sizes are your compression members?
I second this. Make your boomilever heavier and try to hold most of the sand. Once it holds a good amount strat cutting down the weight of your boomilever.
I third this. It's much easier to start heavy and then perfect the design to minimalize weight... I recommend going round 20-30g first and then work your way to 8-15g.
A Science Olympian from 2015 - 2019 CLCSO Alumni
Medal Count:30
IL PPP/Mission Assistant State Supervisor.
CLC Div. B Tournament Director.
President of The Builder Cult.
"A true Science Olympian embraces a life without Science Olympiad by becoming a part of Science Olympiad itself"- Me

User avatar
MadCow2357
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 766
Joined: November 19th, 2017, 9:09 am
Division: C
State: RI
Location: Stark Industries Internship
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 52 times
Contact:

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by MadCow2357 » December 7th, 2018, 8:54 pm

Lol my first boom was 8g... I'm having trouble finding parts to add more support :lol: :lol: :lol:
MadCow2357's Userpage
2020 Events: Boomilever, Machines, Wright Stuff, and sadly not Gravity Vehicle
Gallagher MS '19
Barrington HS '23
Andrew Yang for VP!
In remembrance of Len Joeris (Balsa Man) and Dr. Gerard Putz - Don't cry because they are gone. Smile because they were here.

Chameleon02
Member
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 1:54 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: PICTURES, SCORES, VIDEOS!!

Post by Chameleon02 » December 9th, 2018, 9:14 am

DarthBuilder wrote:
MadCow2357 wrote:
Sciencer101 wrote:
My first thought is that your boom is too heavy, and this is probably what brought you down so low.
Instead of trying to get your boom to hold more, try making it lighter.
I must disagree with Sciencer. The problem with your boom was the buckling of the compression part. I would try thickening the main compression beams. I believe that the load score increase would greatly outweigh the boomilever's weight increase. To go lighter, I think, would not be a good thing at this stage in the season. Try to get at least a load of 10kg first, and then start shaving off weight.

What sizes are your compression members?
I second this. Make your boomilever heavier and try to hold most of the sand. Once it holds a good amount strat cutting down the weight of your boomilever.
the compression pieces were 3/16 balsa square, i believe that is too thin, we are considering rectangular shaped or thicker squares.
Last&SeventhYearSciolyer
2020 Events: Boomilever, Wright Stuff, Protein, Chem lab, Gravvy
The Air Trajectory nostalgia hits hard

Locked

Return to “Boomilever B/C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests