Essentially we ran out of time so we used a pulley to launch something up. It ended up not launching xDPM2017 wrote:how would you use a catapult?JohnsonLuu wrote:Well for everyone's information, my start task worked and my end task was a catapult that did not work.Dreamz wrote:
Scissors jack requires either something pushing the platform up, or something squeezing the X-shaped "legs" together. Gas expanding a syringe might work. Same with a falling weight (although be careful to control speed).
End Task
-
- Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: February 19th, 2019, 10:58 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: End Task
-
- Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: January 22nd, 2018, 6:25 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: End Task
For the platform, we have an exact 6.7cm by 6.7cm platform. However, we glued it to another square below that to attach it to our mechanism. The platform holding the battery is the top one, but looking at it, there are technically two stacked squares of wood. Would this be a problem? We're planning to argue that the top platform is the only one supporting the battery, an nd its the perfect one they should count/measure? The battery won't fall off or touch the platform underneath.
-
- Member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: February 5th, 2019, 3:55 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: End Task
Our machine has a similar design and we've brought it to many competitions. As long as your square below the platform is smaller than the platform in both length and width, I don't think it should be a problem. Certainly helps get the battery out of the box for sure!mpnobivucyxtz wrote:For the platform, we have an exact 6.7cm by 6.7cm platform. However, we glued it to another square below that to attach it to our mechanism. The platform holding the battery is the top one, but looking at it, there are technically two stacked squares of wood. Would this be a problem? We're planning to argue that the top platform is the only one supporting the battery, an nd its the perfect one they should count/measure? The battery won't fall off or touch the platform underneath.
-
- Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: January 22nd, 2018, 6:25 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: End Task
ah yeah that's the problem, the platform below is slightly bigger (like 0.3 cm bigger). Do you think that becomes an issue?Dreamz wrote:Our machine has a similar design and we've brought it to many competitions. As long as your square below the platform is smaller than the platform in both length and width, I don't think it should be a problem. Certainly helps get the battery out of the box for sure!mpnobivucyxtz wrote:For the platform, we have an exact 6.7cm by 6.7cm platform. However, we glued it to another square below that to attach it to our mechanism. The platform holding the battery is the top one, but looking at it, there are technically two stacked squares of wood. Would this be a problem? We're planning to argue that the top platform is the only one supporting the battery, an nd its the perfect one they should count/measure? The battery won't fall off or touch the platform underneath.
-
- Member
- Posts: 95
- Joined: January 10th, 2016, 8:41 am
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: End Task
I believe this would. However, it is not very much work at all to make them the same size. You could do it with a a table saw in under a minute.mpnobivucyxtz wrote:ah yeah that's the problem, the platform below is slightly bigger (like 0.3 cm bigger). Do you think that becomes an issue?Dreamz wrote:Our machine has a similar design and we've brought it to many competitions. As long as your square below the platform is smaller than the platform in both length and width, I don't think it should be a problem. Certainly helps get the battery out of the box for sure!mpnobivucyxtz wrote:For the platform, we have an exact 6.7cm by 6.7cm platform. However, we glued it to another square below that to attach it to our mechanism. The platform holding the battery is the top one, but looking at it, there are technically two stacked squares of wood. Would this be a problem? We're planning to argue that the top platform is the only one supporting the battery, an nd its the perfect one they should count/measure? The battery won't fall off or touch the platform underneath.
-
- Member
- Posts: 592
- Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: End Task
I don't see why this is an issue. From my perspective the platform itself is the surface that the battery touches. Am I missing something?LIPX3 wrote:I believe this would. However, it is not very much work at all to make them the same size. You could do it with a a table saw in under a minute.mpnobivucyxtz wrote:ah yeah that's the problem, the platform below is slightly bigger (like 0.3 cm bigger). Do you think that becomes an issue?Dreamz wrote: Our machine has a similar design and we've brought it to many competitions. As long as your square below the platform is smaller than the platform in both length and width, I don't think it should be a problem. Certainly helps get the battery out of the box for sure!
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n): Hydro: 3/5/18 Robot Arm: na/1/1 Rocks: 1/1/1 2018 (r/s/n): Heli: 2/1/7 Herp: 1/4/4 Mission: 1/1/6 Rocks: 1/1/1 Eco: 6/3/9 2019 (r/s/n): Fossils: 1/1/1 GLM: 1/1/1 Herp: 1/1/5 Mission: 1/1/3 WS: 4/1/10 Top 3 Medals: 144 Golds: 80
-
- Member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: February 5th, 2019, 3:55 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: End Task
Yes it technically is legal. Since the box below the platform is under 10cm wide in this case, it shouldn't be a problem at all. If it were larger than 10cm though.... My gut tells me that arguing it with an ES wouldn't be the best idea.ScottMaurer19 wrote:I don't see why this is an issue. From my perspective the platform itself is the surface that the battery touches. Am I missing something?LIPX3 wrote:I believe this would. However, it is not very much work at all to make them the same size. You could do it with a a table saw in under a minute.mpnobivucyxtz wrote:
ah yeah that's the problem, the platform below is slightly bigger (like 0.3 cm bigger). Do you think that becomes an issue?
-
- Member
- Posts: 95
- Joined: January 10th, 2016, 8:41 am
- Division: C
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: End Task
I agree in that it shouldn't be an issue, however its a point where an event supervisor could find issue with. If there's ever a point in Mission where an event supervisor could find an issue and you can easily fix it, I don't see why you wouldn't.Dreamz wrote:Yes it technically is legal. Since the box below the platform is under 10cm wide in this case, it shouldn't be a problem at all. If it were larger than 10cm though.... My gut tells me that arguing it with an ES wouldn't be the best idea.ScottMaurer19 wrote:I don't see why this is an issue. From my perspective the platform itself is the surface that the battery touches. Am I missing something?LIPX3 wrote: I believe this would. However, it is not very much work at all to make them the same size. You could do it with a a table saw in under a minute.
- PM2017
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: CA
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: End Task
I don't see where they would have a problem. Can you clarify what you mean by "its a point where an event supervisor could find issue with."LIPX3 wrote:I agree in that it shouldn't be an issue, however its a point where an event supervisor could find issue with. If there's ever a point in Mission where an event supervisor could find an issue and you can easily fix it, I don't see why you wouldn't.Dreamz wrote:Yes it technically is legal. Since the box below the platform is under 10cm wide in this case, it shouldn't be a problem at all. If it were larger than 10cm though.... My gut tells me that arguing it with an ES wouldn't be the best idea.ScottMaurer19 wrote: I don't see why this is an issue. From my perspective the platform itself is the surface that the battery touches. Am I missing something?
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
UC Berkeley '23
Go Bears!
- CookiePie1
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 428
- Joined: February 15th, 2018, 5:05 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: End Task
I think ES's tend to get a bad rap, especially on these forums. Don't worry, for the most part they are very reasonable, and if you do need to argue with an ES, they usually take it very well and are fair about it. For something like the size of the platform, as long as the part that touches the battery is square and between 5 and 10 cm, you're fine. I wouldn't worry about it too much.PM2017 wrote:I don't see where they would have a problem. Can you clarify what you mean by "its a point where an event supervisor could find issue with."LIPX3 wrote:I agree in that it shouldn't be an issue, however its a point where an event supervisor could find issue with. If there's ever a point in Mission where an event supervisor could find an issue and you can easily fix it, I don't see why you wouldn't.Dreamz wrote: Yes it technically is legal. Since the box below the platform is under 10cm wide in this case, it shouldn't be a problem at all. If it were larger than 10cm though.... My gut tells me that arguing it with an ES wouldn't be the best idea.
South Brunswick High School Captain '22
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests