Scores Discussion

User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4152
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Location: somewhere in the sciolyverse

Scores Discussion

Postby Unome » October 13th, 2018, 4:56 pm

I noticed this thread wasn't up yet, so I figured I might as well start it, since I just got back from the first tournament in the nation, where I was running Mission.

In case anyone was interested, the top score was a little under 400 - the team had a roughly 15x15x8 box containing only the Start Task, which was bolstered by a mostly good ASL score. Of the 11 competing teams (out of 42 at the tournament), exactly 2 of them had more than one task prepared. In keeping with the conventional wisdom of consistency over more tasks, neither of them actually scored points for more than one of those, and touch penalties pushed both of them down quite a bit. Exactly one team attempted the final action, although they did not succeed, the fact that they had a final action at which to stop timing still raised their score slightly (since based on 4.f a team with no final action would presumably have their operation time continue to run up to 180 seconds). Had the two devices with a nontrivial number of scorable actions worked as intended, they likely would have scored in the range of 500-600 points.
Userpage
Chattahoochee High School Class of 2018
Georgia Tech Class of 2022

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

ScottMaurer19
Member
Member
Posts: 588
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 9:39 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Location: Solon, OH

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby ScottMaurer19 » October 13th, 2018, 6:19 pm

Max points without timers or target time look like 1265 if I added correctly
Solon '19 Captain, CWRU '23
2017 (r/s/n):
Hydro: 3/5/18
Robot Arm: na/1/1
Rocks: 1/1/1

2018 (r/s/n):
Heli: 2/1/7 
Herp: 1/4/4
Mission: 1/1/6
Rocks: 1/1/1
Eco: 6/3/9

2019 (r/s/n):
Fossils: 1/1/1
GLM: 1/1/1
Herp: 1/1/5
Mission: 1/1/3
WS: 4/1/10

Top 3 Medals: 144
Golds: 80

User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby PM2017 » October 14th, 2018, 12:48 pm

The (obviously impossible) ideal score, for a target time of 120 seconds is 1625.0 points.
original image replaced due to accidental self-dox

Image
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!

chessbucket
Member
Member
Posts: 23
Joined: September 5th, 2018, 4:34 pm

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby chessbucket » October 14th, 2018, 7:06 pm

The (obviously impossible) ideal score, for a target time of 120 seconds is 1625.0 points.
original image replaced due to accidental self-dox

Image
unless you utilize a diagonal of the box and not just a wall (one corner to the opposite corner of the box or something similar), it would be difficult to fit in the inclined plane task into a 15x15x15cm box. it has to go up 10cm with IMA of 2, so the horizontal length would have to be 17.32cm... I think the smallest box with everything in it, would at least have one dimension around or over 20cm. Just my thought though :) Hopefully, someone proves me wrong and makes it smaller!
2019: Nationals Mission Possible 2nd
2019: NC Mission Possible 2nd
2018: NC Mission Possible 1st

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes. - Douglas Adams

User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby PM2017 » October 14th, 2018, 10:08 pm

The (obviously impossible) ideal score, for a target time of 120 seconds is 1625.0 points.
original image replaced due to accidental self-dox

Image
unless you utilize a diagonal of the box and not just a wall (one corner to the opposite corner of the box or something similar), it would be difficult to fit in the inclined plane task into a 15x15x15cm box. it has to go up 10cm with IMA of 2, so the horizontal length would have to be 17.32cm... I think the smallest box with everything in it, would at least have one dimension around or over 20cm. Just my thought though :) Hopefully, someone proves me wrong and makes it smaller!
well, I just entered 15 becuase its a number smaller than 30. 29x29x29 would have worked just as easily. Also, I did say it was impossible...
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!

User avatar
windu34
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1342
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Location: Gainesville, Florida

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby windu34 » October 16th, 2018, 5:39 pm

Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000

I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
Florida State Tournament Director 2020
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Member
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage

Circuit Lab Event Supervisor for 2020: UT Austin (B/C), MIT (C), Solon (C), Princeton (C), Golden Gate (C), Nationals (C)

User avatar
PM2017
Member
Member
Posts: 504
Joined: January 20th, 2017, 5:02 pm
Division: Grad
State: CA

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby PM2017 » October 16th, 2018, 6:07 pm

Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000

I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
The first place is probably accurate, but I definitely see more than 5-6 devices getting more than 1400. (Even assuming a time goal of 100s).

EDIT:
Never mind, I miscalculated. Your predictions seem reasonable.
West High '19
UC Berkeley '23

Go Bears!

cpagan
Member
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: February 4th, 2013, 11:25 am
Division: C
State: NY

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby cpagan » November 8th, 2018, 9:27 am

Confused as to scoring of the timer. It must run for a minimum of 10 seconds, but to be scoreable it must run for 30 seconds? "The timer must run for 30 seconds to earn points". So anything between 10 and 30 seconds will not earn points??? Please help clarify

nicholasmaurer
Coach
Coach
Posts: 390
Joined: May 19th, 2017, 10:55 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Location: Solon, OH

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby nicholasmaurer » November 8th, 2018, 10:44 am

Confused as to scoring of the timer. It must run for a minimum of 10 seconds, but to be scoreable it must run for 30 seconds? "The timer must run for 30 seconds to earn points". So anything between 10 and 30 seconds will not earn points??? Please help clarify
I agree this is slightly confusing. Anything running longer than 10 seconds will be considered a timer, and therefore cannot be electrically or spring powered per 3.i. This rule is a holdover from last year that is designed to prevent students from using the easiest options for delaying the run to reach the target time.

The points for your designated timer action occur at a rate of 1 point per second BEFORE the target time. Your timer must run for 30 seconds to earn any of these points. Thus, if it runs 29 seconds it earns no timing points. If it runs 31 seconds (before the target time) it earns 31 points.
Assistant Coach and Alumnus ('14) - Solon High School Science Olympiad
Tournament Director - Northeast Ohio Regional Tournament
Tournament Director - Solon High School Science Olympiad Invitational

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

DrDaveV
Member
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: September 27th, 2017, 2:05 pm

Re: Scores Discussion

Postby DrDaveV » November 19th, 2018, 5:40 pm

Any idea what invitational scores will be like by December and early January in NY, PA, and NJ?


Return to “Mission Possible C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest