By early January, top scores in those areas will probably be in the range of 1000-1200.DrDaveV wrote:Any idea what invitational scores will be like by December and early January in NY, PA, and NJ?
Scores Discussion
- Unome
- Moderator
- Posts: 4338
- Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: GA
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Scores Discussion
-
- Member
- Posts: 30
- Joined: November 19th, 2018, 8:35 am
- State: IN
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores Discussion
Is this with a target time of 120 seconds?windu34 wrote:Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000
I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
[hide]Events|2017-Mission, Hovercraft
2018- Mission, Hover, Codebusters, Source Code
2018- Mission, Hover, Codebusters, Source Code
- windu34
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: FL
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Scores Discussion
I made these with a target time of 105 in mind.Vortexx wrote:Is this with a target time of 120 seconds?windu34 wrote:Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000
I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
University of Florida Science Olympiad Co-Founder
Florida Science Olympiad Board of Directors
[email protected] || windu34's Userpage
- nateDC
- Member
- Posts: 33
- Joined: November 30th, 2018, 4:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: MD
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Scores Discussion
How big are you assuming the box to be?windu34 wrote:I made these with a target time of 105 in mind.Vortexx wrote:Is this with a target time of 120 seconds?windu34 wrote:Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000
I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
I can't think of anything else to put here, so I just wrote this...
- cuber
- Member
- Posts: 47
- Joined: March 25th, 2017, 7:26 am
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores Discussion
I saw your device, it looked excellent! Incredibly compact.ET2020 wrote:1348 won New York State with an 85 second target. We had 9 tasks but no touches.
We placed 4th with a score of ~1100. 11 actions, 2 touches (one scoreable and one non scoreable) and our timer ran over. We ended up extending the height of our device with cardboard after misreading rule 4c
-
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: March 20th, 2018, 5:17 pm
- Division: C
- State: MD
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Scores Discussion
I'm curious what task you didn't attemptcuber wrote:I saw your device, it looked excellent! Incredibly compact.ET2020 wrote:1348 won New York State with an 85 second target. We had 9 tasks but no touches.
We placed 4th with a score of ~1100. 11 actions, 2 touches (one scoreable and one non scoreable) and our timer ran over. We ended up extending the height of our device with cardboard after misreading rule 4c
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest