Page 2 of 4
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: November 19th, 2018, 6:29 pm
by Unome
DrDaveV wrote:Any idea what invitational scores will be like by December and early January in NY, PA, and NJ?
By early January, top scores in those areas will probably be in the range of 1000-1200.
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: December 7th, 2018, 11:02 am
by Vortexx
windu34 wrote:Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000
I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
Is this with a target time of 120 seconds?
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: February 16th, 2019, 7:31 am
by windu34
Vortexx wrote:windu34 wrote:Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000
I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
Is this with a target time of 120 seconds?
I made these with a target time of 105 in mind.
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: March 2nd, 2019, 12:14 pm
by nateDC
windu34 wrote:Vortexx wrote:windu34 wrote:Nationals Score Predictions
1.) 1550
6.) 1350
20.) 1000
I tried to be conservative, I would not be surprised to see my predictions exceeded.
Is this with a target time of 120 seconds?
I made these with a target time of 105 in mind.
How big are you assuming the box to be?
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: March 4th, 2019, 7:27 am
by Airco2020
1205 won our regional competition Saturday. 60 sec target time.
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: March 16th, 2019, 4:28 pm
by ET2020
1348 won New York State with an 85 second target. We had 9 tasks but no touches.
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: March 17th, 2019, 12:38 pm
by cuber
ET2020 wrote:1348 won New York State with an 85 second target. We had 9 tasks but no touches.
I saw your device, it looked excellent! Incredibly compact.
We placed 4th with a score of ~1100. 11 actions, 2 touches (one scoreable and one non scoreable) and our timer ran over. We ended up extending the height of our device with cardboard after misreading rule 4c
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: March 17th, 2019, 2:10 pm
by LIPX3
Marquette won in Wisconsin with a score of ~1400.
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: March 18th, 2019, 6:41 pm
by erico.vert
cuber wrote:ET2020 wrote:1348 won New York State with an 85 second target. We had 9 tasks but no touches.
I saw your device, it looked excellent! Incredibly compact.
We placed 4th with a score of ~1100. 11 actions, 2 touches (one scoreable and one non scoreable) and our timer ran over. We ended up extending the height of our device with cardboard after misreading rule 4c
I'm curious what task you didn't attempt
Re: Scores Discussion
Posted: March 18th, 2019, 7:48 pm
by cuber
erico.vert wrote:
I'm curious what task you didn't attempt
Peltier cells never arrived from amazon
, so no endothermic.