Really? For builds, my team has always worked till the very end of the time for some of the longer ones. Perfecting the structure takes as much time as they allow you112358132134 wrote:I never understood why it was a 3 person event in the first place, it really doesn't take that long and I've always had plenty of extra time at the end.
Protein Modeling C
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 108
- Joined: July 22nd, 2019, 7:52 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: Protein Modeling C
- CookiePie1
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 428
- Joined: February 15th, 2018, 5:05 pm
- Division: C
- State: NJ
- Pronouns: He/Him/His
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Protein Modeling C
As a builder, I've always had to set up Jmol and mark the toober myself. I've never had much of an issue with time, although it is good for two people to be working on the test imo.AlfWeg wrote:Why not? One person for the test and one person for the build makes a bunch of sense, tho the build person might be pressed for time if they have to set up JMOL and mark the Toober. Which is probably the only reason there should be 3-person teamshuppada wrote:There are rumors about Protein Modeling being a two-person event? Any thoughts?
South Brunswick High School Captain '22
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
2020 Events: Protein Modeling, Ping Pong Parachute, Wright Stuff, Sounds of Music
2021 Events: Protein Modeling, Sounds of Music, Ornithology
2022 Events: TBD
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
-Albert Einstein
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 108
- Joined: July 22nd, 2019, 7:52 am
- Division: Grad
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: Protein Modeling C
CookiePie1 wrote:As a builder, I've always had to set up Jmol and mark the toober myself. I've never had much of an issue with time, although it is good for two people to be working on the test imo.AlfWeg wrote:Why not? One person for the test and one person for the build makes a bunch of sense, tho the build person might be pressed for time if they have to set up JMOL and mark the Toober. Which is probably the only reason there should be 3-person teamshuppada wrote:There are rumors about Protein Modeling being a two-person event? Any thoughts?
Hmm, ig builders can do both. At least, my teams builder was always pressed for time, so I had to do JMOL, and then get to the test.
On a side note, I always had a problem with the fact that 2 team members mainly work on the test and it’s only worth 30%. The builder does all of the onsite and, most likely, builds the prebuild(I’m sure the other two do the side chain research and add-ons, but still...) . It’s kind of weird that 2/3 of the members seem to be designed to do less IMO.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests