Sounds of Music C

User avatar
Riptide
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 191
Joined: December 4th, 2017, 7:09 pm
Division: Grad
State: TX
Contact:

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby Riptide » September 9th, 2018, 7:08 pm

Also, the rules say that the best value during the five seconds will be counted for the pitch score. Does this mean that if you had, say a Slide whistle, and slid from a flat F to a sharp F during those 5 seconds—because you hit an in tune F at some point, you would get max points?
that is a clever idea but only deices with a quick decay time can have multiple attacks on the note. ( hitting a mallet or plucking string) and a slide whistle doesnt meet those constraints
I think everyone is missing a very important part of that rule, which is the first few words that say you can only play 1 pitch....
At what point would it not be considered one pitch? Just as an example, if you were on let’s say a string instrument like a violin, you can place your finger down on an ‘A’ and then rotate it very slightly so that it covers what is most definitely the exact cent of 440 (assuming it’s A4). It wouldn’t sound as a different pitch at all, just very fine adjustments in the intonation that would be barely noticeable to the ear but would basically be guaranteed full points. I’m not sure if I made any sense just now but it’s hard for me to describe.
University of California at Berkeley '23
Seven Lakes High School '19
Seven Lakes Junior High '15

UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 1518
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 7:42 am
Division: C
State: PA

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby UTF-8 U+6211 U+662F » September 9th, 2018, 7:13 pm

that is a clever idea but only deices with a quick decay time can have multiple attacks on the note. ( hitting a mallet or plucking string) and a slide whistle doesnt meet those constraints
I think everyone is missing a very important part of that rule, which is the first few words that say you can only play 1 pitch....
At what point would it not be considered one pitch? Just as an example, if you were on let’s say a string instrument like a violin, you can place your finger down on an ‘A’ and then rotate it very slightly so that it covers what is most definitely the exact cent of 440 (assuming it’s A4). It wouldn’t sound as a different pitch at all, just very fine adjustments in the intonation that would be barely noticeable to the ear but would basically be guaranteed full points. I’m not sure if I made any sense just now but it’s hard for me to describe.
If you're sliding on a slide whistle, it's obviously not one pitch. But I think the main takeaway is that you shouldn't press your luck as to flexibility of the rules.

memeus
Member
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: February 16th, 2018, 8:08 am
Division: C
State: KS

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby memeus » September 10th, 2018, 2:21 pm

For creating a 3D printed stringed instrument what is considered a modification? Would it be considered original I used a 3D scanner to scan an instrument to be a base starting file to render off of? Or, would it still be considered original to use files off of sources like Thingiverse and modify those. And, what would be considered a modification?

User avatar
windu34
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1328
Joined: April 19th, 2015, 6:37 pm
Division: Grad
State: FL
Location: Gainesville, Florida

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby windu34 » September 10th, 2018, 2:37 pm

For creating a 3D printed stringed instrument what is considered a modification? Would it be considered original I used a 3D scanner to scan an instrument to be a base starting file to render off of? Or, would it still be considered original to use files off of sources like Thingiverse and modify those. And, what would be considered a modification?
Not official etc etc, but if youre gonna 3D print an instrument, I think youre covered on the modification and have much bigger things to worry about. I would seriously consider the amount of tension you will be placing on the printed parts and think about (or calculate) deformation. I would be very worried about keeping a 3D printed string instrument in tune
Boca Raton Community High School Alumni
Florida State Tournament Director 2020
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Member
kevin@floridascienceolympiad.org || windu34's Userpage

Circuit Lab Event Supervisor for 2020: UT Austin (B/C), MIT (C), Solon (C), Princeton (C), Golden Gate (C), Nationals (C)

User avatar
EastStroudsburg13
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3028
Joined: January 17th, 2009, 7:32 am
Division: Grad
State: MD
Location: At work trying to be a real adult
Contact:

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby EastStroudsburg13 » September 12th, 2018, 6:41 am

This is under the lab event section because along with the build portion, there is a test section as well.
Why can't it be under both?
This way, all of the information about the event is gatheted together. If this thread gets really active, the mods might make a subforum for the build like they did with thermo.
The general preference is to have only one thread for each event for the hybrid lab events that have both test and device portions. If there is significant forum support to put these hybrid events into the Build forums, or to create a new "Hybrid Events" subforum, then that is something we can consider, but right now the policy using Lab Events has worked.
East Stroudsburg South Class of 2012, Alumnus of JT Lambert, Drexel University Class of 2017

Helpful Links
Wiki
Wiki Pages that Need Work
FAQ and SciOly FAQ Wiki
Chat (See IRC Wiki for more info)
BBCode Wiki


If you have any questions for me, always feel free to shoot me a PM.

trdd
Member
Member
Posts: 59
Joined: September 13th, 2018, 7:24 am
State: -

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby trdd » September 13th, 2018, 7:46 am

I wonder how accurate will the devices used at the competitions be. The better not use cell phone apps. I'm specifically talking about the frequency measuring device from the event or the event supervisor not the student's. There could be errors that will include a certain level of randomness into the measuring.

The rules for event supervisors should specify what device to get.

nicholasmaurer
Coach
Coach
Posts: 377
Joined: May 19th, 2017, 10:55 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Location: Solon, OH

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby nicholasmaurer » September 13th, 2018, 7:53 am

I wonder how accurate will the devices used at the competitions be. The better not use cell phone apps. I'm specifically talking about the frequency measuring device from the event or the event supervisor not the student's. There could be errors that will include a certain level of randomness into the measuring.

The rules for event supervisors should specify what device to get.
In a perfect world all ES would have access to high-quality measurement devices and use these for competition. However, this is not always practical or affordable. While I hesitate to speak for the rules committees, I think I am safe in saying that they make an effort to keep events accessible even for teams with limited financial resources. Therefore, they leave this open to ES to provide the best equipment possible; I would expect higher levels of competition (regionals, states, etc.) to make more of an effort to have good equipment than invitationals.
Assistant Coach and Alumnus ('14) - Solon High School Science Olympiad
Tournament Director - Northeast Ohio Regional Tournament
Tournament Director - Solon High School Science Olympiad Invitational

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

User avatar
Unome
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4105
Joined: January 26th, 2014, 12:48 pm
Division: Grad
State: GA
Location: somewhere in the sciolyverse

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby Unome » September 13th, 2018, 7:59 am

I wonder how accurate will the devices used at the competitions be. The better not use cell phone apps. I'm specifically talking about the frequency measuring device from the event or the event supervisor not the student's. There could be errors that will include a certain level of randomness into the measuring.

The rules for event supervisors should specify what device to get.
In a perfect world all ES would have access to high-quality measurement devices and use these for competition. However, this is not always practical or affordable. While I hesitate to speak for the rules committees, I think I am safe in saying that they make an effort to keep events accessible even for teams with limited financial resources. Therefore, they leave this open to ES to provide the best equipment possible; I would expect higher levels of competition (regionals, states, etc.) to make more of an effort to have good equipment than invitationals.
Only in Ohio are regionals and states generally better-run than invitationals :P
Userpage
Chattahoochee High School Class of 2018
Georgia Tech Class of 2022

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.

chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2089
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby chalker » September 13th, 2018, 9:40 am

I wonder how accurate will the devices used at the competitions be. The better not use cell phone apps. I'm specifically talking about the frequency measuring device from the event or the event supervisor not the student's. There could be errors that will include a certain level of randomness into the measuring.

The rules for event supervisors should specify what device to get.
In developing the rules, we tried several devices and found several cell phone apps that work pretty well. We'll be issuing an event supervisors guide with info sometime soon.

I'm curious though as to why you might be assuming that cell phone apps would be inherently error phone in terms of frequency measuring?

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair

nicholasmaurer
Coach
Coach
Posts: 377
Joined: May 19th, 2017, 10:55 am
Division: Grad
State: OH
Location: Solon, OH

Re: Sounds of Music C

Postby nicholasmaurer » September 13th, 2018, 11:08 am

I wonder how accurate will the devices used at the competitions be. The better not use cell phone apps. I'm specifically talking about the frequency measuring device from the event or the event supervisor not the student's. There could be errors that will include a certain level of randomness into the measuring.

The rules for event supervisors should specify what device to get.
In developing the rules, we tried several devices and found several cell phone apps that work pretty well. We'll be issuing an event supervisors guide with info sometime soon.

I'm curious though as to why you might be assuming that cell phone apps would be inherently error phone in terms of frequency measuring?
Is it safe to assume you'll be including the specific apps/devices that you tested and can recommend?

As an aside, I myself did not know the ES guide existed until late last year. I even went to the trouble of making my own for the Solon invitational. Do you have any thoughts about how it could be made more visible to tournament directors and ES? There are several events this year (including Sounds) where I think a consistent message on equipment/tools would be very beneficial.
Assistant Coach and Alumnus ('14) - Solon High School Science Olympiad
Tournament Director - Northeast Ohio Regional Tournament
Tournament Director - Solon High School Science Olympiad Invitational

Opinions expressed on this site are not official; the only place for official rules changes and FAQs is soinc.org.


Return to “2019 Lab Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest