Page 10 of 15

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 9th, 2020, 7:25 pm
by Godspeed
So will NorCal be representing all of California this year?

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 9th, 2020, 7:36 pm
by Umaroth
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 7:25 pm
So will NorCal be representing all of California this year?
That's assuming that nats is still happening.

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 9th, 2020, 8:09 pm
by Godspeed
Umaroth wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 7:36 pm
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 7:25 pm
So will NorCal be representing all of California this year?
That's assuming that nats is still happening.
In your opinion, what is the probability of Nationals happening?

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 9th, 2020, 8:11 pm
by Nurd07
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:09 pm
Umaroth wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 7:36 pm
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 7:25 pm
So will NorCal be representing all of California this year?
That's assuming that nats is still happening.
In your opinion, what is the probability of Nationals happening?
50%

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 9th, 2020, 8:50 pm
by Godspeed
Nurd07 wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:11 pm
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:09 pm
Umaroth wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 7:36 pm


That's assuming that nats is still happening.
In your opinion, what is the probability of Nationals happening?
50%
Yeah, probably.

We had a chance to win state this year Nurd07

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 9th, 2020, 8:57 pm
by Nurd07
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:50 pm
Nurd07 wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:11 pm
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:09 pm


In your opinion, what is the probability of Nationals happening?
50%
Yeah, probably.

We had a chance to win state this year Nurd07
I wonder who we were going to beat?

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 9th, 2020, 9:01 pm
by Godspeed
Nurd07 wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:57 pm
Godspeed wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:50 pm
Nurd07 wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 8:11 pm


50%
Yeah, probably.

We had a chance to win state this year Nurd07
I wonder who we were going to beat?
Idk, but I have hope in next year's team.

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 10th, 2020, 5:23 am
by EastStroudsburg13
bearasauras wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 5:56 pm
SoCal will not be looking for an alternative to host the 2020 Southern California State Tournament. Since there would not be a fair way to select teams to represent Southern California at the National Tournament, Southern California will not be sending any teams to the 2020 National Tournament.
Still not sure I agree with this, but I suppose it depends on your definition of fair. I hope coach/team feedback was sought before making that decision.

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 10th, 2020, 5:41 am
by boomifailure
EastStroudsburg13 wrote:
March 10th, 2020, 5:23 am
bearasauras wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 5:56 pm
SoCal will not be looking for an alternative to host the 2020 Southern California State Tournament. Since there would not be a fair way to select teams to represent Southern California at the National Tournament, Southern California will not be sending any teams to the 2020 National Tournament.
Still not sure I agree with this, but I suppose it depends on your definition of fair. I hope coach/team feedback was sought before making that decision.
I think it is smart since it will cause less outrage. Like it may have been slim, but a favorite could've been upsetted at the competition, so you can't just send the favored teams to win.

Re: Southern California 2020

Posted: March 10th, 2020, 6:09 am
by EastStroudsburg13
boomifailure wrote:
March 10th, 2020, 5:41 am
EastStroudsburg13 wrote:
March 10th, 2020, 5:23 am
bearasauras wrote:
March 9th, 2020, 5:56 pm
SoCal will not be looking for an alternative to host the 2020 Southern California State Tournament. Since there would not be a fair way to select teams to represent Southern California at the National Tournament, Southern California will not be sending any teams to the 2020 National Tournament.
Still not sure I agree with this, but I suppose it depends on your definition of fair. I hope coach/team feedback was sought before making that decision.
I think it is smart since it will cause less outrage. Like it may have been slim, but a favorite could've been upsetted at the competition, so you can't just send the favored teams to win.
I suppose. I still think not sending anyone is worse. I could be wrong.

I would accept the reasoning of not wanting to risk carrying the virus to nationals, but I don't think that reason has been used yet.