In fact, it may be the strongest showing by _any_ team since 1918, when the Spanish flu made the scariest campaign to take over everyone else. More recently, the 1918 flu's younger sibling (the Swine Flu) made a team, and won in 2009, but it seems that COVID-19 might have a stronger performance than Swine Flu.smayya337 wrote: ↑March 8th, 2020, 7:12 pmCOVID-19's performance this year has been nothing to sneeze at (honestly, it might be the best anyone has seen since Ebola 2014), but I think Influenza will give them a run for their money. You can never count out the ol' Flu.SilverBreeze wrote: ↑March 8th, 2020, 6:38 pmI think all, given that they seem to be stacking like they always do.pepperonipi wrote: ↑March 8th, 2020, 6:37 pm
For #3, are you referring to Influenza A, B, or C? I feel like Influenza's teams all have a pretty good shot at Nats this year, and I'm not clear on which of their teams you're referring to
EDIT: Based off invitational performances, they seem to be very strong this year, though still trailing behind COVID-19 and Nobody.
The event I'm really keeping an eye out for at Nats is Disease Detectives. Both COVID and Flu are sickeningly good at this event, and I think whoever wins DD is likely to win the whole tourney.
I would say that Ebola looked to be an extremely strong team, and had a very impressive invitational season, but couldn't get off the ground for most events later on in their campaign.