Junkyard Challenge B
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: April 7th, 2010, 11:07 am
- Division: C
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
I was informed by our SO advisor that this event 'Junkyard Challenge' will be considered a trial event at our state (Ohio)competition. We can still metal but our score will not help the team. Has anyone heard this or know why this was done?
- brobo
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 445
- Joined: April 8th, 2009, 2:44 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
As far as I know, JYC is NOT a "trial event". Its considered a full event, for all states. Trial events only appear in a single state, and JYC is in all states.
--Texas!
brobo's Userpage
"Let's put all our differences behind us, for science. You monster."
Ubuntu is awesome.
brobo's Userpage
"Let's put all our differences behind us, for science. You monster."
Ubuntu is awesome.
-
- Staff Emeritus
- Posts: 433
- Joined: November 10th, 2001, 3:06 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
From http://www.ced.osu.edu/scioly/
3/22/10: Updated tentative schedules: division B and division C, Trajectory Clarification, parking at Ohio State, map of Ohio State. Please note: Junkyard Challenge, Division B, has been changed to a trial event.
Information expressed here is solely the opinion of the author. Any similarity to that of the management or any official instrument is purely coincidental! Doing Science Olympiad since 1987!
- fmtiger124
- Member
- Posts: 480
- Joined: March 8th, 2009, 3:59 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
not always, Helicopter is offered in numerous states and nats offers trials if they were only in single states nats wouldn't have themrobodude wrote:Trial events only appear in a single state.
-
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: April 5th, 2009, 9:28 am
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
Can anyone explain to me why a device can run for 6.9 seconds and still complete the task?
Section 3.b wrote:The device must trip all 4 unmodified mousetraps within 1 minute to receive maximum points.
Section 3.i wrote:Timing will stop when the intended fourth mousetrap is tripped or when 60 seconds is reached. Actions occurring after 60 seconds will not be scored.
60 seconds is equal to 60 seconds. Even if it did say "whole seconds," 60 whole seconds is STILL equal to 60 seconds. That's simpler than math. The only place where the rules mention "whole seconds" is here:End of Section 4 wrote:Ties will be broken as follows: 1. Fewest penalty points; 2. Longest time of operation up to 60 seconds.
But obviously, if it operates for longer than 60 seconds, there is no task completion, according to section 3.i. 1 minute is 60 seconds, not 60.9. I have no idea why the FAQ said what it did on February 2. Can anyone explain how a device can run for 60.9 seconds get the maximum score?Section 4.g wrote:2 points for each whole second the device operates up to task completion
- haven chuck
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 343
- Joined: April 28th, 2007, 2:35 pm
- Division: C
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
This was posted on soinc.org, so it is official- http://soinc.org/node/533
2010 Can't Judge a Powder- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
2010 Science Crimebusters- 3rd in the NATION
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 343
- Joined: November 14th, 2008, 5:17 am
- Division: Grad
- State: PA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
Think of it this way - at 60.9 seconds, how many whole seconds have elapsed? 60. At 61.0 seconds, 61 seconds will have elapsed. Thus, this would be out of the range. At 59.9 seconds, how many seconds have elapsed? Only 59 whole seconds have. This is the reason. I would have thought, just from the rules, that 60.01 should be a better score than 60.99, but the rule clarification makes it clear that that is not the case.
I think it's very smart that Ohio made it a trial event. That's quite a statement for them to make, but in such a competitive state with so many strong schools, my thinking is that they decided they didn't want the nationals qualifier to be decided by judge subjectivity in JYC, since there will be so many schools that are so close that it could swing it as many as 10 points, which is enough to change overall standings significantly.
I think it's very smart that Ohio made it a trial event. That's quite a statement for them to make, but in such a competitive state with so many strong schools, my thinking is that they decided they didn't want the nationals qualifier to be decided by judge subjectivity in JYC, since there will be so many schools that are so close that it could swing it as many as 10 points, which is enough to change overall standings significantly.
Harriton '10, UVA '14
Event Supervisor in MA (prev. VA and NorCal)
Event Supervisor in MA (prev. VA and NorCal)
-
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: April 5th, 2009, 9:28 am
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
FAQs aren't extensions of the rules, are they? They're just supposed to agree with the rules. Clarifications are extensions of the rules. And in this case, the FAQ disagrees with the rules. I really don't get it.
The rules don't mention whole seconds, except in the 2 points rule. So yes, according to that rule, a 60.5 second machine that comleted the task would get 120 points for time. But according to the other rules, which do not use "whole seconds," this could never happen, because there would be no task completion.nejanimb wrote:Think of it this way - at 60.9 seconds, how many whole seconds have elapsed? 60. At 61.0 seconds, 61 seconds will have elapsed. Thus, this would be out of the range. At 59.9 seconds, how many seconds have elapsed? Only 59 whole seconds have. This is the reason. I would have thought, just from the rules, that 60.01 should be a better score than 60.99, but the rule clarification makes it clear that that is not the case.
I think it's very smart that Ohio made it a trial event. That's quite a statement for them to make, but in such a competitive state with so many strong schools, my thinking is that they decided they didn't want the nationals qualifier to be decided by judge subjectivity in JYC, since there will be so many schools that are so close that it could swing it as many as 10 points, which is enough to change overall standings significantly.
-
- Member
- Posts: 366
- Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 9:08 am
- Division: Grad
- State: OH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
I'm not involved in the decision making but can explain (somewhat..)acanoli wrote:Can anyone explain to me why a device can run for 6.9 seconds and still complete the task?
Section 3.b wrote:The device must trip all 4 unmodified mousetraps within 1 minute to receive maximum points.Section 3.i wrote:Timing will stop when the intended fourth mousetrap is tripped or when 60 seconds is reached. Actions occurring after 60 seconds will not be scored.60 seconds is equal to 60 seconds. Even if it did say "whole seconds," 60 whole seconds is STILL equal to 60 seconds. That's simpler than math. The only place where the rules mention "whole seconds" is here:End of Section 4 wrote:Ties will be broken as follows: 1. Fewest penalty points; 2. Longest time of operation up to 60 seconds.
But obviously, if it operates for longer than 60 seconds, there is no task completion, according to section 3.i. 1 minute is 60 seconds, not 60.9. I have no idea why the FAQ said what it did on February 2. Can anyone explain how a device can run for 60.9 seconds get the maximum score?Section 4.g wrote:2 points for each whole second the device operates up to task completion
Basically the goal is to run the machine as close to 60 seconds as possible while getting all of the other points. Somewhere along the line it was decided that, since 60.9 is still 60 "whole" seconds, actions occuring between 60.0 and 60.99 should still be scored. Add in another FAQ involving microcontrollers and suddenly many teams are running in that very close 1.0 second margin. Since reaction time is around 0.2 seconds (and varies widely) the problems with scoring occurred.
I'm sure it will all get worked out but until then, questions will continue...
-
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: April 5th, 2009, 9:28 am
- Division: B
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Junkyard Challenge B
Also, look at the excel score sheet on soinc. The formula for the time tiebreaker only works correctly for times less than or equal to 60 seconds. For example, for 60.9 seconds, it gives you 0.9 for the "deviation from 60 seconds" field for the tiebreaker. In other words, if you give it a number greater than 60, it starts going backwards. Obviously it isn't meant for values greater than 60. Just saying.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests