It's About Time C

Jim_R
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 283
Joined: May 13th, 2001, 4:22 pm
Division: Grad
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Contact:

It's About Time C

Postby Jim_R » June 9th, 2009, 9:08 pm

Discussion for It's About Time C.

[wiki]It's About Time[/wiki]
2009 Thread

User avatar
Sheogorath
Member
Member
Posts: 160
Joined: February 17th, 2007, 4:35 pm
Division: Grad
Location: Shivering Isles

Re: It's About Time C

Postby Sheogorath » August 3rd, 2009, 6:50 pm

I wish I was still in SciOly to continue on with this event. Oh well.

So does anybody know what the planned changes to the rules are going to be? Are they going to change the size limit? Narrow down how much can be on the test?
2007 Events: Remote Sensing, Astronomy, Fermi Questions, SumoBots
2008 Events: Remote Sensing, Astronomy, Herpetology, SumoBots, Forensics

2009 Events: Remote Sensing 3, Astronomy 2, Fossils 2, Sumobots 1, It's About Time 1, Chem Lab 2

scienceolympiadist
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: April 6th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH

Re: It's About Time C

Postby scienceolympiadist » August 4th, 2009, 6:05 am

I've always wondered if you can perfect water as the timing device. I briefly tried it last year, and gave up to do other events when it failed. I wonder if I have the time and the mind to experiment with that again this year.

Paradox21
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 395
Joined: January 11th, 2009, 7:10 am
Division: Grad

Re: It's About Time C

Postby Paradox21 » August 4th, 2009, 10:52 am

I've always wondered if you can perfect water as the timing device. I briefly tried it last year, and gave up to do other events when it failed. I wonder if I have the time and the mind to experiment with that again this year.
I also tinkered with water clocks at the beginning of the season. Keeping the water pressure constant was pretty easy to fix, but what I was stumped on was how to account for variations in barometric pressure and other natural variations. I ended up switching to pendulums because they are a lot cleaner and simpler. Of course these same problems occur with pendulums but it seems to have less of an effect. We ended up with a pendulum clock that was almost perfect, only fluctuating with human error. This year, I am going to try to eliminate the human error. Easier said than done.
When it comes to the future, there are three kinds of people: those who let it happen, those who make it happen, and those who wonder what happened.

scienceolympiadist
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: April 6th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH

Re: It's About Time C

Postby scienceolympiadist » August 4th, 2009, 1:59 pm

For pendulum...wouldn't the amplitude damper signifcantly over time?

Paradox21
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 395
Joined: January 11th, 2009, 7:10 am
Division: Grad

Re: It's About Time C

Postby Paradox21 » August 5th, 2009, 1:42 pm

For pendulum...wouldn't the amplitude damper signifcantly over time?
Yes, but that's one of the great properties of pendulums. The period of the pendulum is not dictated by the amplitude. So basically, even as the amplitude lessens the period will stay the same as long as you keep the length of the pendulum and the gravity constant.
When it comes to the future, there are three kinds of people: those who let it happen, those who make it happen, and those who wonder what happened.

scienceolympiadist
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: April 6th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH

Re: It's About Time C

Postby scienceolympiadist » August 5th, 2009, 7:19 pm

Right, T = 2(pi) * (L/g)^(1/2). But eventually, the amplitude becomes so small that it's hard to discern an oscillation. Then, it just stops moving.

Paradox21
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 395
Joined: January 11th, 2009, 7:10 am
Division: Grad

Re: It's About Time C

Postby Paradox21 » August 5th, 2009, 7:53 pm

Right, T = 2(pi) * (L/g)^(1/2). But eventually, the amplitude becomes so small that it's hard to discern an oscillation. Then, it just stops moving.
Yep, but the longest time trial last year was 5 minutes so you only have to have a discernable oscillation for 5 minutes. It's not hard to do at all.
When it comes to the future, there are three kinds of people: those who let it happen, those who make it happen, and those who wonder what happened.

scienceolympiadist
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: April 6th, 2007, 12:08 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH

Re: It's About Time C

Postby scienceolympiadist » August 6th, 2009, 7:52 am

Really? I remember I tried something very simple: a string wrapped around a pencil, with a screw at the end of the string. The oscillations dampened after about 10 seconds.

Paradox21
Staff Emeritus
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 395
Joined: January 11th, 2009, 7:10 am
Division: Grad

Re: It's About Time C

Postby Paradox21 » August 6th, 2009, 12:01 pm

Really? I remember I tried something very simple: a string wrapped around a pencil, with a screw at the end of the string. The oscillations dampened after about 10 seconds.
Make sure your string is long enough, and the heavier the weight on the end is, the longer it will take for the pendulum to stop. Make sure that you have a sturdy frame to hold your pendulum on. If your frame isn't sturdy enough, or you just hold it in your hand, the swinging of the pendulum will cause the frame to sway and it will steal some of the kinetic energy which will cause it to dampen faster.
When it comes to the future, there are three kinds of people: those who let it happen, those who make it happen, and those who wonder what happened.


Return to “2010 Build Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest