Sumo Bots C

User avatar
Frogger4907
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: September 16th, 2010, 11:16 am
Division: C
State: KS

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby Frogger4907 » May 4th, 2011, 11:05 am

What I mean is that there are some people who will be making the decision who don't like fermi as an event. I do agree though that it's most likely sumo will be removed and fermi will come back. But note the question mark next to fermi in the summer schedule!
that is very true.... as well :)
State: 1st overall Thermodynamics lab

penclspinner
Member
Member
Posts: 174
Joined: June 1st, 2006, 10:48 pm

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby penclspinner » May 4th, 2011, 12:29 pm

What I mean is that there are some people who will be making the decision who don't like fermi as an event.
I have not seen any information supporting this assumption, either on this forum or otherwise. Unless you've been personally speaking to any State Directors and/or National Supervisors who have said that they do not like this event I would very careful about making such blanket statements.

User avatar
Frogger4907
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: September 16th, 2010, 11:16 am
Division: C
State: KS

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby Frogger4907 » May 4th, 2011, 12:32 pm

What I mean is that there are some people who will be making the decision who don't like fermi as an event.
I have not seen any information supporting this assumption, either on this forum or otherwise. Unless you've been personally speaking to any State Directors and/or National Supervisors who have said that they do not like this event I would very careful about making such blanket statements.
I see why you said that, oh wait... no I don't, because it doesn't even matter.
State: 1st overall Thermodynamics lab

Schrodingerscat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 342
Joined: March 2nd, 2011, 7:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: KS
Location: Kansas City metro

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby Schrodingerscat » May 4th, 2011, 12:59 pm

I would like to point out that question mark could have been used as an abbreviation of the word question, since the full name is Fermi Questions and not to indicate the tentativeness of the event.

User avatar
Frogger4907
Member
Member
Posts: 458
Joined: September 16th, 2010, 11:16 am
Division: C
State: KS

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby Frogger4907 » May 4th, 2011, 1:09 pm

dang, your smart :P
State: 1st overall Thermodynamics lab

User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby illusionist » May 4th, 2011, 1:24 pm

Schrodingerscat, are you a study person? Science Olympiad has many types of events. Next year happens to be one with few interesting build events. Sumobots has been expensive for many teams, and to see it go after only 1 year....... I realize it was difficult to run, but still... I don't see what you could prepare for in Fermi. It just doesn't seem like a real event to me... Anyways, this isn't the right place to discuss this.
2012-2013 Building Event Captain
Rule 7d. "Event Supervisors are allowed to break any competitors' devices" -bearasauras

Schrodingerscat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 342
Joined: March 2nd, 2011, 7:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: KS
Location: Kansas City metro

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby Schrodingerscat » May 4th, 2011, 2:30 pm

I do agree sumo bot is a good event and should be continued. However, I do not think it should continue instead of Fermi. Could it not also fit under the category of Technology and postpone robotic arm another year? I have trouble seeing how it fits as "Inquiry/nature of science" instead of technology and engineering anyway, where Fermi fits easily into that classification.

User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby illusionist » May 4th, 2011, 3:37 pm

Right, I completely agree with the statement directly above. Sumo Bots is definitely more of an engineering event, and Fermi is more of a Nature-of-Science thing. I personally have a negative view towards events such as Fermi and WIDI. That's just my views. However, I think Fermi would be fun to participate in, just not necessarily in Science Olympiad.
2012-2013 Building Event Captain
Rule 7d. "Event Supervisors are allowed to break any competitors' devices" -bearasauras

chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2089
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby chalker » May 4th, 2011, 5:19 pm

...... I don't think a few SO'ers complaining on a general forum constitutes as "controversialness" and I'm pretty sure that Fermi is not going to be switched out at the last minute.
Well said and quite true.

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair

chalker
Member
Member
Posts: 2089
Joined: January 9th, 2009, 7:30 pm
Division: Grad
State: OH

Re: Sumo Bots C

Postby chalker » May 4th, 2011, 5:23 pm

What I mean is that there are some people who will be making the decision who don't like fermi as an event. I do agree though that it's most likely sumo will be removed and fermi will come back. But note the question mark next to fermi in the summer schedule!
that is very true.... as well :)
No it's not. And I don't see any question mark: http://soinc.org/sites/default/files/up ... -26-11.pdf

Student Alumni
National Event Supervisor
National Physical Sciences Rules Committee Chair


Return to “2011 Build Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest