Protein Modeling C
-
- Member
- Posts: 44
- Joined: April 19th, 2010, 6:16 pm
- Division: C
- State: TX
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
they recently posted the theme for Protein Modeling next year!
http://cbm.msoe.edu/stupro/so/index.html
http://cbm.msoe.edu/stupro/so/index.html
2012 State:
1st Robot Arm
2nd Protein Modeling
3rd Microbe Mission
1st Robot Arm
2nd Protein Modeling
3rd Microbe Mission
- FullMetalMaple
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 302
- Joined: February 6th, 2011, 10:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: KS
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
Definitely. I saw at least two instances where teams were only .01 points apart. That's incredible. Good job to everyone!Paradox21 wrote:Those scores were incredibly close. It just goes to show how much it helps to just put in that little extra bit to your pre-build. It can bump you up quite a few places. I'd imagine that with so many teams at nationals, most of the events stack up really tightly and most people never realize how close they were to the top places.
Wow, that looks awfully exciting. I was already looking forward to this event next year, but I really love this idea!GCXC wrote:they recently posted the theme for Protein Modeling next year!
http://cbm.msoe.edu/stupro/so/index.html
- Infinity Flat
- Member
- Posts: 274
- Joined: March 12th, 2010, 4:00 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
Very exciting! The specific proteins appear to be XIAP as the pre-build, and then Caspases and the MHC as on-site proteins.GCXC wrote:they recently posted the theme for Protein Modeling next year!
http://cbm.msoe.edu/stupro/so/index.html
(State, Nationals)
2013: Astro (2, 6) / Chem (2, 5) / Circuits (8, 36) / Diseases (1,1) / Fermi (N/A, 24) / Materials (1, N/A)
2012 : Astro (1, 11) / Chem (N/A, 13) / Diseases (3, 1) / Optics (2, 3) / Sounds (2, 1)
2011: Astro(2,11) / Diseases (1,27) / Optics (1,13) / Proteins (2,15)
2013: Astro (2, 6) / Chem (2, 5) / Circuits (8, 36) / Diseases (1,1) / Fermi (N/A, 24) / Materials (1, N/A)
2012 : Astro (1, 11) / Chem (N/A, 13) / Diseases (3, 1) / Optics (2, 3) / Sounds (2, 1)
2011: Astro(2,11) / Diseases (1,27) / Optics (1,13) / Proteins (2,15)
- quizbowl
- Member
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: April 10th, 2010, 3:48 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
Where do you see that?Infinity Flat wrote:Very exciting! The specific proteins appear to be XIAP as the pre-build, and then Caspases and the MHC as on-site proteins.GCXC wrote:they recently posted the theme for Protein Modeling next year!
http://cbm.msoe.edu/stupro/so/index.html
2010: 5th in NYS
2011: 4th in NYS
2012: 3rd in NYS
2011: 4th in NYS
2012: 3rd in NYS
<quizbowl> ey kid ya want some shortbread
<EASTstroudsburg13> I don't know why, but I just can't bring myself to delete this post.
- Infinity Flat
- Member
- Posts: 274
- Joined: March 12th, 2010, 4:00 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: WA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
On the link.quizbowl wrote:Where do you see that?Infinity Flat wrote:Very exciting! The specific proteins appear to be XIAP as the pre-build, and then Caspases and the MHC as on-site proteins.GCXC wrote:they recently posted the theme for Protein Modeling next year!
http://cbm.msoe.edu/stupro/so/index.html
The left ribbon talks about XIAP in the prebuild section.
The other two are mentioned within the body text, so I'm just assuming we'll be modeling them.
(State, Nationals)
2013: Astro (2, 6) / Chem (2, 5) / Circuits (8, 36) / Diseases (1,1) / Fermi (N/A, 24) / Materials (1, N/A)
2012 : Astro (1, 11) / Chem (N/A, 13) / Diseases (3, 1) / Optics (2, 3) / Sounds (2, 1)
2011: Astro(2,11) / Diseases (1,27) / Optics (1,13) / Proteins (2,15)
2013: Astro (2, 6) / Chem (2, 5) / Circuits (8, 36) / Diseases (1,1) / Fermi (N/A, 24) / Materials (1, N/A)
2012 : Astro (1, 11) / Chem (N/A, 13) / Diseases (3, 1) / Optics (2, 3) / Sounds (2, 1)
2011: Astro(2,11) / Diseases (1,27) / Optics (1,13) / Proteins (2,15)
-
- Member
- Posts: 39
- Joined: August 22nd, 2005, 8:25 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
Yeah, especially given that it's impossible to take all subjectivity out of the model judging, I think it's best to regard your placement in this event as placing you in a range rather than a position. I've had events where five teams were separated by less than half a point (that easily could have been granted or taken away on subjective calls).
NYS/Lower Hudson Valley Protein Modeling event supervisor
Entomology 2nd and 3rd in NY state
Rocks and Minerals 5th and 6th in NY state
Entomology 2nd and 3rd in NY state
Rocks and Minerals 5th and 6th in NY state
- Phenylethylamine
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: January 8th, 2009, 4:47 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
It looks like that was how they designated a tiebreaker- i.e., if two teams had the same score, the one that did better on the tiebreakers received an extra .01 point.FullMetalMaple wrote: Definitely. I saw at least two instances where teams were only .01 points apart. That's incredible. Good job to everyone!
Protein Modeling Event Supervisor 2015
MA State Science Olympiad Tournament
MIT Invitational Tournament
--
Ward Melville High School Science Olympiad 2010-2012
Paul J Gelinas JHS Science Olympiad 2007-2009
MA State Science Olympiad Tournament
MIT Invitational Tournament
--
Ward Melville High School Science Olympiad 2010-2012
Paul J Gelinas JHS Science Olympiad 2007-2009
-
- Member
- Posts: 39
- Joined: August 22nd, 2005, 8:25 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
Uhhh... is question #10 wrong on the 2011 national exam answer key?
NYS/Lower Hudson Valley Protein Modeling event supervisor
Entomology 2nd and 3rd in NY state
Rocks and Minerals 5th and 6th in NY state
Entomology 2nd and 3rd in NY state
Rocks and Minerals 5th and 6th in NY state
- FullMetalMaple
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 302
- Joined: February 6th, 2011, 10:39 am
- Division: Grad
- State: KS
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
That's what I thought, too.Phenylethylamine wrote:It looks like that was how they designated a tiebreaker- i.e., if two teams had the same score, the one that did better on the tiebreakers received an extra .01 point.FullMetalMaple wrote: Definitely. I saw at least two instances where teams were only .01 points apart. That's incredible. Good job to everyone!
...Yes, I think it is. It's induced pluripotent stem cells that can't produce trophoblast and placenta, whereas totipotent can. Shouldn't it be A instead of D? The same question was on the regional test, with the answer choices in the same order, and the correct answer is A there.kwijiborjt wrote:Uhhh... is question #10 wrong on the 2011 national exam answer key?
Otherwise, the test looked great. Again, I wish I could have been at nationals.
- Phenylethylamine
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: January 8th, 2009, 4:47 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: MA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Protein Modeling C
After seeing my prebuild score (35.75/40) on that spreadsheet, I assumed that I must not have gotten credit for some creative additions... but having read the rubric, I had literally every one of the creative additions specifically mentioned. I really have no idea where I lost that many points, especially since the checklist for the secondary and tertiary structure sounds almost exactly like what I myself did at home before competition. I can only guess that maybe I lost points if they didn't feel my extra creative additions (not mentioned in the rubric) were sufficiently related to the function of the protein? I could see a half- or quarter- point here or there, but I can't figure out how I lost 4.25 points.
Oh well. I'll be posting photos of my model and card in the image gallery as soon as I get around to actually taking said photos.
Oh well. I'll be posting photos of my model and card in the image gallery as soon as I get around to actually taking said photos.
Protein Modeling Event Supervisor 2015
MA State Science Olympiad Tournament
MIT Invitational Tournament
--
Ward Melville High School Science Olympiad 2010-2012
Paul J Gelinas JHS Science Olympiad 2007-2009
MA State Science Olympiad Tournament
MIT Invitational Tournament
--
Ward Melville High School Science Olympiad 2010-2012
Paul J Gelinas JHS Science Olympiad 2007-2009
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests