2011-2012 Rules

User avatar
Primate
Member
Member
Posts: 409
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 4:34 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by Primate »

aubrey048 wrote:Again, I thought last year's tasks were simpler, more interesting. This year was WICKED hard as far as tasks. That's why I chose not to repeat in the event. :?
But this year teams really rose to the challenge, and I applaud them for it.
That's what I thought too, at first, but my Mission for this year was much simpler. With the help of these forums, you can find some pretty ingenious ways to accomplish everything with minimal effort.
events 2012 gravity vehicle, robot arm, thermodynamics, tps
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by illusionist »

Just wondering, would it be possible to allows the use of devices and motors such as those found in the Lego Mindstorms NXT kit?
User avatar
aubrey048
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 270
Joined: January 8th, 2010, 9:43 am
Division: C
State: AL
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by aubrey048 »

illusionist wrote:I did not participate in Mission Possible last year, but I saw the task list. They were simple, leaving a, what I assume, smaller range of scores. This year's tasks require creative thinking, to find a solution to a problem. This is similar to the real world of science, where you don't have a given set of instructions. I personally loved almost all of this year's tasks. However, they really should be awarded points based on the difficulty to build and implement. Maybe we could somehow award points based on both categories (how to do the task, and actually making it work)?
I disagree. As a participant last year, I thought that the tasks were VERY difficult to accomplish. However, this year's were even more so, it seems. (I didn't compete this year)
illusionist wrote:Just wondering, would it be possible to allows the use of devices and motors such as those found in the Lego Mindstorms NXT kit?
I believe so. Mindstorms 2.0 is/was legal, I assume that NXT is also legal (Ah, Mindstorms. Those were the days!)
Plotting the function of the universe for efficiency without your permission.

Projected 2011-2012 Events: Anatomy, Microbe Mission, Disease Detectives, Tower, Optics, Helicopter.
Past Events: Anatomy (7th), Helicopter (6th), Mission Possible (1st), Write It Do It (4th, 8th), Ornithology (5th).
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by illusionist »

Wait, so those were allowed this year?!?!? I don't have a copy of the rules on me, but I think they limit you to only certain electrical componenents, and I think Mindstorms are illegal.
Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1388
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by Flavorflav »

No integrated circuits this year or last year, so no, Mindstorms would not have been legal either year - not the brick, motors or sensors, at least. I guess you could use structural components.
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by illusionist »

I think it would be too easy to allow us to use those. Getting close to the ideal time wouldn't be a challenge anymore.
twototwenty
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
Posts: 292
Joined: March 24th, 2011, 10:28 am
Division: Grad
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by twototwenty »

Yes, in my opinion, the use of integrated ciruits would make mission way too easy, as you could have the entire thing programed and thus controlled to an unreasonable degree. It would make the whole thing pointless, as what makes mission what it is is the error that will always be there.
Last edited by twototwenty on March 31st, 2011, 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Primate
Member
Member
Posts: 409
Joined: January 15th, 2009, 4:34 pm
Division: C
State: NY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by Primate »

twototwenty wrote:Yes, in my opinion, the use of integrated ciruits would make mission way too easy, as you could have the entire thing programed and thus controlled to an unfair degree. It would make the whole thing pointless, as what makes mission what it is is the error that will always be there.
Yeah, the biggest problem would be hooking up an electronic stopwatch to your sandtimer.
Flavorflav wrote:No integrated circuits this year or last year, so no, Mindstorms would not have been legal either year - not the brick, motors or sensors, at least. I guess you could use structural components.
Oh, are those the ones with the built in rotation sensors?
events 2012 gravity vehicle, robot arm, thermodynamics, tps
User avatar
illusionist
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Division: C
State: MI
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by illusionist »

Yes they are. Basically a servo, some gears, and rotation sensors packed into a nice package.
Dark Sabre
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 705
Joined: January 4th, 2004, 5:53 pm
Division: Grad
State: KY
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: 2011-2012 Rules

Post by Dark Sabre »

The older rules that allowed microprocessors also had a broader rule against parallel design. At least at the National level this meant that you couldn't use electronics to time other transfers or act as a fail-safe to let the machine run if something messes up.

Like you couldn't use a timer to make sure the rest of the machine ran after x seconds of sandtimer because you would have two things happening, either of which could trigger the next action in the machine (parallel design). The same way for trying to program fail-safe ways for the machine to continue without having to make a touch. It would all count as parallel design.

So getting perfect time and a reliable device is just as challenging with micro-controllers, I promise you. You still have to hand-tune the machine every time you run it and build reliable transfers.


The RCX system had separate rotation sensors. The RCX motors are pure gearmotors inside.
The NXT system's motors have internal rotation sensors.
Locked

Return to “Mission Possible C”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests