That's what I thought too, at first, but my Mission for this year was much simpler. With the help of these forums, you can find some pretty ingenious ways to accomplish everything with minimal effort.aubrey048 wrote:Again, I thought last year's tasks were simpler, more interesting. This year was WICKED hard as far as tasks. That's why I chose not to repeat in the event.
But this year teams really rose to the challenge, and I applaud them for it.
2011-2012 Rules
- Primate
- Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: January 15th, 2009, 4:34 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
events 2012 gravity vehicle, robot arm, thermodynamics, tps
- illusionist
- Member
- Posts: 942
- Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
Just wondering, would it be possible to allows the use of devices and motors such as those found in the Lego Mindstorms NXT kit?
- aubrey048
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: January 8th, 2010, 9:43 am
- Division: C
- State: AL
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
I disagree. As a participant last year, I thought that the tasks were VERY difficult to accomplish. However, this year's were even more so, it seems. (I didn't compete this year)illusionist wrote:I did not participate in Mission Possible last year, but I saw the task list. They were simple, leaving a, what I assume, smaller range of scores. This year's tasks require creative thinking, to find a solution to a problem. This is similar to the real world of science, where you don't have a given set of instructions. I personally loved almost all of this year's tasks. However, they really should be awarded points based on the difficulty to build and implement. Maybe we could somehow award points based on both categories (how to do the task, and actually making it work)?
I believe so. Mindstorms 2.0 is/was legal, I assume that NXT is also legal (Ah, Mindstorms. Those were the days!)illusionist wrote:Just wondering, would it be possible to allows the use of devices and motors such as those found in the Lego Mindstorms NXT kit?
Plotting the function of the universe for efficiency without your permission.
Projected 2011-2012 Events: Anatomy, Microbe Mission, Disease Detectives, Tower, Optics, Helicopter.
Past Events: Anatomy (7th), Helicopter (6th), Mission Possible (1st), Write It Do It (4th, 8th), Ornithology (5th).
Projected 2011-2012 Events: Anatomy, Microbe Mission, Disease Detectives, Tower, Optics, Helicopter.
Past Events: Anatomy (7th), Helicopter (6th), Mission Possible (1st), Write It Do It (4th, 8th), Ornithology (5th).
- illusionist
- Member
- Posts: 942
- Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
Wait, so those were allowed this year?!?!? I don't have a copy of the rules on me, but I think they limit you to only certain electrical componenents, and I think Mindstorms are illegal.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
No integrated circuits this year or last year, so no, Mindstorms would not have been legal either year - not the brick, motors or sensors, at least. I guess you could use structural components.
- illusionist
- Member
- Posts: 942
- Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
I think it would be too easy to allow us to use those. Getting close to the ideal time wouldn't be a challenge anymore.
-
- Exalted Member
- Posts: 292
- Joined: March 24th, 2011, 10:28 am
- Division: Grad
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
Yes, in my opinion, the use of integrated ciruits would make mission way too easy, as you could have the entire thing programed and thus controlled to an unreasonable degree. It would make the whole thing pointless, as what makes mission what it is is the error that will always be there.
Last edited by twototwenty on March 31st, 2011, 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Primate
- Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: January 15th, 2009, 4:34 pm
- Division: C
- State: NY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
Yeah, the biggest problem would be hooking up an electronic stopwatch to your sandtimer.twototwenty wrote:Yes, in my opinion, the use of integrated ciruits would make mission way too easy, as you could have the entire thing programed and thus controlled to an unfair degree. It would make the whole thing pointless, as what makes mission what it is is the error that will always be there.
Oh, are those the ones with the built in rotation sensors?Flavorflav wrote:No integrated circuits this year or last year, so no, Mindstorms would not have been legal either year - not the brick, motors or sensors, at least. I guess you could use structural components.
events 2012 gravity vehicle, robot arm, thermodynamics, tps
- illusionist
- Member
- Posts: 942
- Joined: March 20th, 2010, 4:13 pm
- Division: C
- State: MI
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
Yes they are. Basically a servo, some gears, and rotation sensors packed into a nice package.
-
- Admin Emeritus
- Posts: 705
- Joined: January 4th, 2004, 5:53 pm
- Division: Grad
- State: KY
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: 2011-2012 Rules
The older rules that allowed microprocessors also had a broader rule against parallel design. At least at the National level this meant that you couldn't use electronics to time other transfers or act as a fail-safe to let the machine run if something messes up.
Like you couldn't use a timer to make sure the rest of the machine ran after x seconds of sandtimer because you would have two things happening, either of which could trigger the next action in the machine (parallel design). The same way for trying to program fail-safe ways for the machine to continue without having to make a touch. It would all count as parallel design.
So getting perfect time and a reliable device is just as challenging with micro-controllers, I promise you. You still have to hand-tune the machine every time you run it and build reliable transfers.
The RCX system had separate rotation sensors. The RCX motors are pure gearmotors inside.
The NXT system's motors have internal rotation sensors.
Like you couldn't use a timer to make sure the rest of the machine ran after x seconds of sandtimer because you would have two things happening, either of which could trigger the next action in the machine (parallel design). The same way for trying to program fail-safe ways for the machine to continue without having to make a touch. It would all count as parallel design.
So getting perfect time and a reliable device is just as challenging with micro-controllers, I promise you. You still have to hand-tune the machine every time you run it and build reliable transfers.
The RCX system had separate rotation sensors. The RCX motors are pure gearmotors inside.
The NXT system's motors have internal rotation sensors.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests