Disease Detectives B/C

User avatar
deezee
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: January 17th, 2011, 7:19 am
Division: C
State: IL
Location: On earth

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby deezee » November 1st, 2012, 2:31 pm

What are the biases and errors that we had to know?
What disease did cured ham actually have?
If 4 out of 5 people SUFFER from diarrhea...Does that mean the fifth one enjoys it?
I used to be healthy, until I took an arrow to the knee and got gangrene.

User avatar
butter side up
Member
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: January 6th, 2011, 9:52 am
Division: Grad
State: PA
Location: The TARDIS, temporarily stopped at 221B Baker Street

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby butter side up » November 5th, 2012, 10:46 am

What are the biases and errors that we had to know?
Confounding error is the one that I see the most frequently. Other than that, it usually seems to be more along the lines of "identify some potential sources of bias/error in this study" or something along those lines. Even those are very rare.

Has anyone else noticed that the "environmental" diseases include food- and water-borne diseases? It seems to be those PLUS the chemical and physical agents. It seems to be a rather broad spectrum. Do you think that those will still be heavily included, or will the focus be more on the 'purely' environmental diseases and injuries?
I am the one called "TARDIS Hat Girl," and am known as such by all.
2013: Anatomy, Experimental Design, Genetics, Forestry, Disease Detectives

Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1358
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby Flavorflav » November 6th, 2012, 6:53 am

What are the biases and errors that we had to know?
Confounding error is the one that I see the most frequently. Other than that, it usually seems to be more along the lines of "identify some potential sources of bias/error in this study" or something along those lines. Even those are very rare.

Has anyone else noticed that the "environmental" diseases include food- and water-borne diseases? It seems to be those PLUS the chemical and physical agents. It seems to be a rather broad spectrum. Do you think that those will still be heavily included, or will the focus be more on the 'purely' environmental diseases and injuries?
That depends on the event writer. Personally, I would not use diseases that fall under the foodborne category, since that is a topic for another year. Similarly, I would not include those waterborne diseases which are heavily influenced by population density, since those fall under population growth. We had a focus on zoonoses once a while back, but since that doesn't seem to have entered the rotation I would consider those diseases fair game. This puts "natural" environmental agents such as Rickettsia, Borellia, Giardia etc. back on the table.

coool12
Member
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: November 14th, 2012, 1:30 am
Division: B
State: KY

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby coool12 » November 14th, 2012, 1:37 am

nice posts..........

User avatar
deezee
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: January 17th, 2011, 7:19 am
Division: C
State: IL
Location: On earth

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby deezee » November 15th, 2012, 2:41 pm

What are the biases and errors that we had to know?
Confounding error is the one that I see the most frequently. Other than that, it usually seems to be more along the lines of "identify some potential sources of bias/error in this study" or something along those lines. Even those are very rare.

Has anyone else noticed that the "environmental" diseases include food- and water-borne diseases? It seems to be those PLUS the chemical and physical agents. It seems to be a rather broad spectrum. Do you think that those will still be heavily included, or will the focus be more on the 'purely' environmental diseases and injuries?
yeah the focus is pretty broad, but I think the majority of scenarios will involve things like carbon monoxide poisoning or sunburns and other "purely" environmental stuff, like you said.
What disease did cured ham actually have?
If 4 out of 5 people SUFFER from diarrhea...Does that mean the fifth one enjoys it?
I used to be healthy, until I took an arrow to the knee and got gangrene.

strawberrygirl
Member
Member
Posts: 24
Joined: August 9th, 2012, 10:30 am
Division: C
State: TX

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby strawberrygirl » November 18th, 2012, 6:00 pm

Would a case study be similar to a case-control study? It was on our invitational test and we were kinda confused because some of the answers were clearly case-control, but it wasn't an option...

Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1358
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby Flavorflav » November 18th, 2012, 6:22 pm

No. A case study is a study of a single case - i.e., one patient. They are usually only done on extremely interesting or unusual patients, and are only of use in epidemiology in the aggregate and for poorly understood conditions. What did you see on your test?

ptkid
Member
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: March 12th, 2011, 6:54 am
Division: Grad
State: TX
Location: Texas

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby ptkid » November 18th, 2012, 7:20 pm

No. A case study is a study of a single case - i.e., one patient. They are usually only done on extremely interesting or unusual patients, and are only of use in epidemiology in the aggregate and for poorly understood conditions. What did you see on your test?
That's what we told the proctor, but he told us that they'll be considered the same thing in this test. The answer choices were: Double Blind, Cohort, Case Study, and Cross Sectional. On the answer key the said odds ratio was cohort. I'm positive that the answer to that was case control and that wasn't a choice. There some other blatant mistakes as well. (I'm their partner)
Seven Lakes High School '16
Previous National Champion in Green Generation and National Medalist in CJAP, Disease Detectives, Entomology, & Water Quality

Flavorflav
Member
Member
Posts: 1358
Joined: February 5th, 2006, 7:06 am
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby Flavorflav » November 21st, 2012, 9:30 am

While I am not entirely clear what the original question was from your comments, it sounds like you are right and the answer key was wrong. Cohort studies use risk ratio or rate ratio, both generally called relative risk. Odds rataio is appropriate for case-control studies and sometimes ecological analyses.

User avatar
deezee
Member
Member
Posts: 109
Joined: January 17th, 2011, 7:19 am
Division: C
State: IL
Location: On earth

Re: Disease Detectives B/C

Postby deezee » November 29th, 2012, 2:41 pm

No. A case study is a study of a single case - i.e., one patient. They are usually only done on extremely interesting or unusual patients, and are only of use in epidemiology in the aggregate and for poorly understood conditions. What did you see on your test?
I thought a case study was simply a broad term that encompasses cohort, case control, cross-sectional, etc.
What disease did cured ham actually have?
If 4 out of 5 people SUFFER from diarrhea...Does that mean the fifth one enjoys it?
I used to be healthy, until I took an arrow to the knee and got gangrene.


Return to “2013 Study Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests